On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Peter Townson wrote:
> On the general topic of Z80 development/support:
>
> Is anyone out there targeting the eZ80 with SDCC ?
Heh, I wish. I do a lot of stuff with the eZ80F91 in particular,
and programming it is a painful experience because their all-singin
On February 13, 2008 06:27:22 pm Peter Townson wrote:
> Pedro,
>
>
>
> Yes SDCC most certainly does support the Z180 - I'm playing with one
> (HD64180 really, but same difference) in my spare time.
>
>
>
> HOWEVER, there is no inherent support for the Memory Management/Bank
> Switching mechanisms t
Title: --
Aha! My Oct '07 manual didn't have this in it, but the manual two
months later does! Cutting edge.
Many thanks.
- Berwyn
Maarten Brock wrote:
>From the manual: --Werror
Hello,
Is there any way to tell SDCC to fail (non-zero exit code) on warnings?
Thanks,
Berwyn
Guys,
On the general topic of Z80 development/support:
Is anyone out there targeting the eZ80 with SDCC ?
Peter Townson
##
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Please consider our environment before printing this
email.This email and
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>I'd love to see that get done; I plan to do some Z180/HD64180
> stuff later this year.
Dave
When I was playing with the port access stuff I made contact with this
gentleman - this is his web-site: home.comcast.net/~mcatudal
His particular i
On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Peter Townson wrote:
>> There don't seem to be that many people using or working
>> on the Z80 port of SDCC.
>
> I use it (infrequently) :->
>
> Some years ago I implemented the SFR port access methods for the Z80
> (others kindly made my initial klunky attempts work pr
On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Maarten Brock wrote:
> There don't seem to be that many people using or working
> on the Z80 port of SDCC.
I use it (infrequently) :->
Some years ago I implemented the SFR port access methods for the Z80
(others kindly made my initial klunky attempts work properly) -
Pedro,
Yes SDCC most certainly does support the Z180 - I'm playing with one
(HD64180 really, but same difference) in my spare time.
HOWEVER, there is no inherent support for the Memory Management/Bank
Switching mechanisms that are available to the Z180/HD64180.
As far as I know (I am ha
Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Maarten Brock wrote:
>
>> There don't seem to be that many people using or working
>> on the Z80 port of SDCC.
>>
>
>[raises hand]
>
>I use it periodically, just FYI.
>
> -Dave
>
>
[ and another hand ]
I
Maarten Brock schrieb:
> Ernst,
>
> See also our oldest still open bug: 817589
>
> There don't seem to be that many people using or working
> on the Z80 port of SDCC.
>
> Sorry,
> Maarten
I use it. I worked on the Z80 peepholes last year and intend to improve
dead code elimination this year.
Reminds me of a couple of my favourite threads on 8052.com:
http://www.8052.com/forum/thread.phtml?thread=130415
http://www.8052.com/forum/thread.phtml?thread=137677
So, the conclusion is, everything clear, so it's now just simple coding,
that's all... :-)
Jan Waclawek
PS. Berwyn, the usual Open
On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Maarten Brock wrote:
> There don't seem to be that many people using or working
> on the Z80 port of SDCC.
[raises hand]
I use it periodically, just FYI.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
---
Ernst,
See also our oldest still open bug: 817589
There don't seem to be that many people using or working
on the Z80 port of SDCC.
Sorry,
Maarten
> Hi!
>
> I am looking for a possibility to debug SW compiled by SDCC when running on
> a Z180. The NoICE debugger seems interesting, also because
Hi Berwyn,
> 1. Atomic access (see 3.8.1.2). It sure would be nice if the critical keyword
> worked on variable
> declarations. It would make access to the variable atomic. For example, a
> typical timer interrupt
> would run a long msec counter, and main() would check it to see if >1000 ms
>
Hi,
my SDCC installation and tool chain for HC08 seem to be working pretty
much okey,
I can compile, link and run small C-programs.
However, when ever write code that involves the compiler suppor C
integer math functions
the math comes out bad, mosty result is 1. The code does not chras and
the
>From the manual: --Werror
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any way to tell SDCC to fail (non-zero exit code) on warnings?
>
> Thanks,
> Berwyn
>
> --
>
> Berwyn Hoyt, Senior Hardware Engineer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ph: +64 3 359 2101; Mobile: +64 21 045 7830
> Brush Technology: www.brush.co.nz
>
16 matches
Mail list logo