Hi,
richo wrote:
> I would literally just keep a copy of the binary.
If the binary alone suffices...
> Don't worry about trying to keep both versions installed ala gentoo
> slots, I think you'll just make more headaches for yourself.
I don't think that's worth it either.
> you could be very sn
On 19/11/11 09:26 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 02:27:50PM +1100, richo wrote:
What about the obvious, just keep a 4.03 binary around while you do the
upgrade.
Well, the thing with it is that it's not that obvious. So thanks for
the idea! :-)
The 4.0.3 and 4.1.0 debi
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 02:27:50PM +1100, richo wrote:
> What about the obvious, just keep a 4.03 binary around while you do the
> upgrade.
Well, the thing with it is that it's not that obvious. So thanks for
the idea! :-)
The 4.0.3 and 4.1.0 debian packages can't be installed at the same
ti
On 18/11/11 19:11 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi Sadrul,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:47:59PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
2011/10/8 Axel Beckert :
> I'm currently preparing an upload of the current screen HEAD to Debian
> (either Unstable or Experimental, not yet decided) and I noticed th
Hi Sadrul,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:47:59PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> 2011/10/8 Axel Beckert :
> > I'm currently preparing an upload of the current screen HEAD to Debian
> > (either Unstable or Experimental, not yet decided) and I noticed that,
> > if I have a screen 4.0.3 (as curre
Hi again,
For those who think "TL;DR", the commit for the 4.0.3 release is very
likely ee51fe58adee19357375b007e0e81e37317773b8. If you're interested
how I found that out, continue reading. :-)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > The screen.git repo has no tags. The
2011/10/8 Axel Beckert :
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently preparing an upload of the current screen HEAD to Debian
> (either Unstable or Experimental, not yet decided) and I noticed that,
> if I have a screen 4.0.3 (as currently in Debian Stable/Unstable) is
> running, I can't reattach to that with the new
Hi Fernando,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 04:12:13PM +0100, Fernando Vezzosi wrote:
> > Is this issue known? Not circumventable? An unexpected bug? Anyone has
> > an idea where this comes from? Or does it not happen at all with vanilla
> > screen versions?
>
> I noticed the message while upgrading scr
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 02:45:27PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently preparing an upload of the current screen HEAD to Debian
> (either Unstable or Experimental, not yet decided) and I noticed that,
> if I have a screen 4.0.3 (as currently in Debian Stable/Unstable) is
> running,
