Hi Arnold,
arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> > This is a whole longer topic about future directions of infrastructure
> > but in the comparison of https and ssh then ssh is the better. In the
> > difference between anonymous access by https and anonymous access by
> > git:// then I worry about recommend
Hi.
> This is a whole longer topic about future directions of infrastructure
> but in the comparison of https and ssh then ssh is the better. In the
> difference between anonymous access by https and anonymous access by
> git:// then I worry about recommending git:// moving forward.
So you're sa
Hi Arnold,
arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> Thanks for the note and sorry I didn't reply earlier.
Please. No apologies needed. It wasn't very long at all. And we are
deep into the holiday here! Nothing is happening very fast right now. :-)
> Things were indeed working in the morning, and I have s
Hi.
Thanks for the note and sorry I didn't reply earlier. Things were indeed
working in the morning, and I have switched the one https:// repo over
to being git://.
I understand that ssh is best, but there's no reason for me to ask for
contributor access on all the GNU projects I follow via git!
Hi Arnold,
Arnold Robbins wrote:
> I'm having trouble pulling from Savannah:
>
> === groff
> fatal: unable to access 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/groff.git/': Failed
> to connect to git.savannah.gnu.org port 443: Connection timed out
Hmm... This is working for me at this time. However se
