Hi. > This is a whole longer topic about future directions of infrastructure > but in the comparison of https and ssh then ssh is the better. In the > difference between anonymous access by https and anonymous access by > git:// then I worry about recommending git:// moving forward.
So you're saying https:// is preferable to git:// ? > > I understand that ssh is best, but there's no reason for me to ask for > > contributor access on all the GNU projects I follow via git! > > Definitely agreed! > > Perhaps it would be best to publish the https url and also the git url > as as a fallback in the case of temporary problems? Not sure what you're suggesting here? Thanks, Arnold
