>I won't object the migration of #savannah to some other IRC
>network if someone trustable first check than it doesn't have
>issues like this one (Or precisely this one). But I'm
>definitively not that "someone".
>
> I see no reason why you can't do it, could you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
2011-03-19 for Alfred M. Szmidt thread "#savannah on irc.gnu.org".
>I won't object the migration of #savannah to some other IRC network
>if someone trustable first check than it doesn't have issues like
>this one (Or precisely this one).
I won't object the migration of #savannah to some other IRC network
if someone trustable first check than it doesn't have issues like
this one (Or precisely this one). But I'm definitively not that
"someone".
I see no reason why you can't do it, could you do it so we can resolve
this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
2011-03-15 for Alfred M. Szmidt thread "#savannah on irc.gnu.org".
Hello Alfred.
> I haven't recived any updates on this, have you tried using Freenode
> with TOR?
No.
> Can you try to contact supp...@freenode.net again and work to solve
> this i
I haven't recived any updates on this, have you tried using Freenode
with TOR? Could you update me on the status?
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:48 -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> That #savannah was moved was a mistake, lets fix that first since it
> is simple.
It's not clear to most people here that that was a mistake.
You are proposing the change here; you need to justify your proposal.
You aren't doing so.
>
Can you try to contact supp...@freenode.net again and work to solve
this issue? Continuing this dicussion here won't solve the issue.
Please CC me as well; I don't know TOR or use it, so I would be the
wrong person to try solve any issues.
To have #savannah q officially on Freenode we would ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
2011-03-03 for Alfred M. Szmidt copy in savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org,
thread "#savannah on irc.gnu.org".
Hello Alfred.
> We shouldn't confuse the discussion, it is about having #savannah on
> irc.gnu.org, not about Freenode, OTFC or where to hos
We shouldn't confuse the discussion, it is about having #savannah on
irc.gnu.org, not about Freenode, OTFC or where to host it.
If TOR users have issues with Freenode it is better to solve the
problems with them, than changing networks every week. Could you
bring the issues you experienced with s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
2011-03-02 for Michael J. Flickinger copy in
savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org thread "#savannah on irc.gnu.org".
> I'm not necessarily against what you're saying, but I look at this a
> little bit differently. Freenode is the GNU project's official
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 19:11 -0500, Michael J. Flickinger wrote:
> Who, just wondering? Bear in mind, Freenode does allow tor if you
> connect to their tor hidden node.
>
> Just curious, are you using TOR?
Freenode only allows clients using a very new authentication scheme
that's so far only off
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:02 -0500, Michael J. Flickinger wrote:
> I think since Freenode is GNU's official IRC server that we should move
> the channel back.
FWIW, I do agree.
> Simply put, to users, I think going to irc.gnu.org #savannah should be
> the proper channel.
>
> Is anyone opposed
Excuse my ignorance and the obvious question, but does IRC have any
concept of "forwarding", such that whichever network is actually hosting
it, people logging on to other networks can be told (or automatically
sent to) the other place?
Hi Mario,
I'm not necessarily against what you're saying, but I look at this a
little bit differently. Freenode is the GNU project's official IRC
network; hence, it makes sense to have the channel there... I think the
real qualm you have is with freenode being the official GNU network.
If w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
2011-03-02 in savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org thread "#savannah on
irc.gnu.org".
Hello.
You have exposed reasons regarding why #savannah should be back in
Freenode. However, it would be a fallacy if we take a decision based
solely on the Freenode
Hi Alfred,
I'm going to have to agree here.
It's very annoying to have all the GNU channels on one network
(Freenode) and the savannah channel residing on another. Further, since
irc.gnu.org points to irc.freenode.net, a lot of users login to
Freenode's savannah channel with questions that o
16 matches
Mail list logo
