Re: [Savannah-help-public] svn vs. arch

2005-05-22 Thread Karl Berry
GNU Savannah being, in a way, part of the GNU project, wouldn't it make sense to put efforts in supporting GNU Arch first? I can't argue with that. I wonder how and when Arch got dubbed GNU. It did not go through the evaluation process, as far as I can tell. Oh well. Best, k

Re: [Savannah-help-public] svn vs. arch

2005-05-22 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi Karl, GNU Savannah being, in a way, part of the GNU project, wouldn't it make sense to put efforts in supporting GNU Arch first? You know, "It means that the developers agree to pay attention to making the program work well with the rest of the GNU system--and conversely that the GNU project w

Re: [Savannah-help-public] svn vs. arch

2005-05-19 Thread Michael J. Flickinger
We were looking in to supporting GNU Arch on Savannah, though right now it's certainly on the back burner and its exact implementation still would have to be figured out. The idea of supporting subversion has come up before. Idealy, it would be fantastic to have both subversions, cvs, and GNU

[Savannah-help-public] svn vs. arch

2005-05-18 Thread Karl Berry
I recently heard a rumour that you were working on adding GNU Arch support to savannah. Is that true, and if so, is it set in stone? FWIW, I personally would find subversion support far more useful for maintaining my GNU packages. Based on discussions with other GNU maintainers, I don't think I