In this case, if I don't reply, maybe you'll believe I didn't read
your mail.
Not this time, because I asked you please to reply when you have the
answer. I explicitly said I did not expect a reply until then.
If you don't expect a reply immediately, I think the system should not
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:48:01AM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I rely on the mail reminder system to keep track of what things have been
> done and what things have not been.
>
> When I send a message asking you to reply when a certain job is done,
> that means I have set a reminder. Please
I rely on the mail reminder system to keep track of what things have been
done and what things have not been.
When I send a message asking you to reply when a certain job is done,
that means I have set a reminder. Please do NOT reply to the message
before the time I said. If you do, you will can
I'll reply to this message when I do.
Unfortunately, you replied prematurely and canceled the reminder.
Please delete the other message, and reply to THIS message
when you have looked at the issue:
Matches of the specified string in package names should come first,
and the shortest
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:18:22PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [I sent this message two weeks ago but did not get a response.]
>
> Indeed they are two separate issues. I could not tell from the
> message which one it was about.
>
> Matches of the specified string in package names should
[I sent this message two weeks ago but did not get a response.]
Indeed they are two separate issues. I could not tell from the
message which one it was about.
Matches of the specified string in package names should come first,
and the shortest matches should come first among the matches.
Indeed they are two separate issues. I could not tell from the
message which one it was about.
Matches of the specified string in package names should come first,
and the shortest matches should come first among the matches.
That way, if you enter the exact name of a package, that pac
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:33:42PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Currently the search result order is directly provided by MySQL. After
> giving it a look a few weeks ago I concluded this would require to
> actually implement the search post-processing (and not just modifying
> s
Currently the search result order is directly provided by MySQL. After
giving it a look a few weeks ago I concluded this would require to
actually implement the search post-processing (and not just modifying
something that exists) (sorry for not answering at that time).
How about a
Hello,
Currently the search result order is directly provided by MySQL. After
giving it a look a few weeks ago I concluded this would require to
actually implement the search post-processing (and not just modifying
something that exists) (sorry for not answering at that time).
I don't plan to wor
10 matches
Mail list logo
