Hi,
Jason Joines wrote:
> I'm using xsane-0.95 and sane-1.0.14 on SuSE Linux 9.2 and trying to
> get my Auto Document Feeder to work. It will scan documents from the
> ADF but you have to hit the scan button for each page so it's just one
> page at a time. Any ideas?
If the GUI you use has
Hi,
Thomas Frayne wrote:
> I do not recommend the HP7450C for use with SANE. I spent 18 months
I have really no idea why you needed 18 months to get the scanner
running. With any well done distribution it should work out of the box
(well most probably not Debian or Gentoo - but I wrote well d
Hi,
George Garvey wrote:
>You're not alone. I can't remember when I bought the 7450C, but it
> has worked sometimes, and then SANE is broken, and then worked, etc.
> I've never had the ADF work reliably, and that was the purpose of the
> purchase.
>Rene has had problems with the ADF on th
Hi,
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> the problem is our SANE 1 standard, which defines the image format.
> We have currently only the possibility to pass RGB data to a frontend.
>
> The solution (whenever we can start) is SANE 2 where we have a more flexible
> approach for transmitting image data to a fr
Hi,
Major A wrote:
>>- starting SANE 2 with, let's say 2 or three backends (in the end your Avision
>> stuff, my Plustek backends (plustek, plustek_pp and u12, maybe some other
>> VOLUNTEERS - hell lot of work to do ;)
>
>
> I've been suggesting that for months. As soon as a simple S
Hi,
Martin Deppe wrote:
> well, it doesn't crash anymore - thank you so far - but it doesn't find
> the device anymore ... (none of xsane, scanimage, xscanimage or kooka)
...
> When I use the current version the following happens:
> -
Hi,
Marcus Hufgard (Kalkwerk Hufgard GmbH) wrote:
>> SANE_DEBUG_AVISION=7 scanimage -L
>
> Sorry, but this brings no debug information.
Hm - maybe --enable-optimization disables them :-(
The option is new to me and it is not used in our T2
(http://www.exactcode.de/t2) package ...
> Butt
Hi Feizhou,
Feizhou wrote:
> Both exit with 138 and report "Bus error" one or two seconds after being
> invoked on the command line.
Your messages misses all the information we need to diagnose your
problem (platform, scanner in use, ...).
So you should have included that you run Mac OS X 10.3
Hi,
thanks for your report.
Ken Harris wrote:
> I have a Minolta DImage Scan Dual III that I used on my Mac, and I was
> wondering what would be needed to get it working under Linux. As you
> may recall, Gary Wong posted a preliminary report a while back[1] about
> trying to get it working -- w
Hi,
Mart van de Wege wrote:
> I just got a Minolta Scan Dual II film scanner, as this is a fairly
> common device on the 2nd hand market and well supported under sane
> according to the supported devices list. It took a little work to set
> up (I forgot Debian doesn't do a lot of auto-configuring
Hi Robin - hi all,
Robin Rowe wrote:
> The GIMP plugin interface is too restrictive. The new CinePaint
> interface is a shared memory framebuffer. Independent applications will
> be able to directly access CinePaint images in memory, not have to
> launch from within CinePaint.
>
> We're looki
Hi,
Ivan Fernandez wrote:
>>>Hello, and sorry if this is slightly off-topic. I've been thinking
>>>about buying a dedicated slide/negative scanner, but none of the models
>>>I've seen in the market seem to be supported by SANE. Could anyone give
>>>me recommendations about which film scanners w
Hi,
Jonathan Hipkiss wrote:
> I'm looking for an A3 scanner, that is still available to buy, that
> works under Linux.
>
> Nothing under 600dpi and preferably more.
>
> A USB interface would be best.
>
> I've looked around the SANE site but most scanners listed don't mention
> if they are A3
Hi,
Richard Reina wrote:
> I have been using the Fujitsu M3091DC for about 2.5
> years. I would like to upgrade to a scanner higher
> quality faster document scanner, preferrably one that
> can handle odd sized pages ( smaller than 8.5" by 11"
> ) and would not require that I darken a document by
Hi,
Philip J. Hollenback wrote:
> Rene, do you have any comments on the problems I'm having with usb in
> the latest code?
Hi, I think I have the same issue with the AV120 and AV210. I keep you
posted when I got more detailed out of the tests ...
Yours,
--
René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Be
16.0 +0200
+++ sane-frontends-1.0.13-adfmod/src/scanadf.c 2005-07-11 12:33:58.0
+0200
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
scanimage by Andreas Beck and David Mosberger
Copyright (C) 1999 Tom Martone
+ Copyright (C) 2005 Rene Rebe ([ -p | --pipe] script option)
This program is free softw
Hi,
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Also check CVS, there is a change concerning waiting for the scripts
> to be finished before exiting. This makes your patch fail (one hunk).
Ouhm. I have to admit I have again managed to forget the root password
for the debian site ... :-((
Unfortunatly the f
Hi.
Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it
already worked-around in some way?
Thanks
- Ren=E9
-- =
Ren=E9 Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin
e-mail: rene.r...@gmx.net, r...@rocklinux.org
web: www.rocklinux.org, drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/
Anyone sending unwanted ad
Hi.
On: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 22:35:19 +0100 (CET),
"Franz Bakan" wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2002 21:55:04 +0100 (CET), Rene Rebe wrote:
> =
> >Hi.
> >
> >Is there still the u_int64_t problem in CVS for OS/2 - or is it
> >already worked-around in some way?
>
Hi,
On: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:51:40 +0100,
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > I see, but this has to be fixed also by the maintainers. I wrote th=
e directly
> > (Rene and Henning), but at least from Rene I got no response so far=
...
Hm - never arrived here :-( ?
I also seem to miss the begin
Hi,
On: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:28:07 +,
Tony Jones wrote:
> Hi,
> =
> Can anyone give me any tips on getting my HP Scanjet 5370C working. I=
> can get the scanner working to a fashion by setting calibrate once, b=
ut
> the scanned image is generally corrupt, however tweaking the settings=
Hi,
On: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:41:09 +0100,
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
> =
> Does anyone know anything about the "Avision C7" chipset used in the
> Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 8200?
Not yet. Do you have a USB snoop - does it work when you add the
device ID to the avision driver?
> Bye,
>
Hi,
On Saturday 21 October 2006 01:14, Endicott Lovell wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I recently started using Linux, and have been trying to get my scanner
> to work for quite some time. I have an HP ScanJet 5300c. I am running
> sane 1.0.18 and sane-frontends 1.0.14.
>
> The sane website says that this
Hi,
On Saturday 21 October 2006 20:06, en wrote:
> Well, I don't have hpusb loaded. And trying it as root doesn't provide
> any different results. Any other ideas?
Nope. Maybe you hit a bug in the recent Linux kernels with USB 1 devices
behind USB 2 hubs.
What is the output of:
SANE_DEBUG_AVIS
Hi,
On Sunday 22 October 2006 22:02, en wrote:
> [avision] attach: opening libusb:001:004
> [avision] attach: open failed (Invalid argument)
> [avision] sane_init: Trying to find USB device 3f0 701 ...
> [avision] attach:
> [avision] attach: opening libusb:001:004
> [avision] attach: open failed (
Yes, the debug log would be welcome.
Sidenot: a backend, mine specifically, should not be able to interfere
with
Xorg. If Xorg crashes than more likely due to an bug allocating an
overly
large pixmap from XSane or Kooka or something like that. Though of corse
Xorg (the X server or an driver) s
HI,
On 03.04.2008, at 17:28, blizzi wrote:
> Hi i've got some more info about crash of kooka & xsane.
> its looks like you were right.
>
> this is part of my Xorg.0.log
>
> SetClientVersion: 0 9
> SetClientVersion: 0 9
> (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket)
> (II) APM registered succ
Hi,
On 04.04.2008, at 01:05, Tymoteusz wrote:
> m. allan noah pisze:
>> On 4/3/08, Tymoteusz wrote:
>>
Yeah, just that X segfaulted, does not tell much.
However, you could test with scanimage in a xterm (or variant) or
even
the console text terminal to check your
HI,
in the meantime we found the bug, some assignments got
lost during some merge window. I'll commit the a fix to
CVS today.
On 07.04.2008, at 02:42, Gabriele Gorla wrote:
> I don't have the debug log (I can post it later if
> necessary), but I the backend stopped working for me
> too on a comp
Hi,
On 09.04.2008, at 21:27, stef wrote:
> Le Wednesday 09 April 2008 12:48:22 Ren? Rebe, vous avez ?crit :
>
>>
>> As the backend controls the device and reads the image data somehow,
>> it should have knowledge about the actual head position and should be
>> able to perform the required actions
On 10.04.2008, at 21:33, stef wrote:
> Le Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:38:26, vous avez ?crit :
>>
>> You are still just arguing around the dancing cow here.
>>
>> With a potentially new sane_end whatever function you still would
>> have
>> to
>> keep track where the head is. A frontend may still
litlle girl wrote:
> Hi guyz,
> i recognize that win drivers dont calibrate my CIS scanner before scan.
> gt68xx backend is loosing about 20sec every time on calibrating!
> Is there any way to turn off gt68xx backend calibrating?
> Most stuff i scan at lineart and i don't need calibrating neither
>
litlle girl wrote:
>> The windows driver probably calibrates once, when the scanner is
>> first used, and stores the reference data somewhere (file, registry,
>> etc.).
>>
>> The SANE driver should try to do the same (not registry of course,
>> but some /var/... whatever file-system location.
>>
>>
litlle girl wrote:
> AFE settings looks more stable:
>
> grep "\[gt68xx\] afe" ./*
> ./color-1.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
> ./color-2.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
> ./color-3.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
> ./gray-1.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04
Hi,
Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> Rene Rebe schrieb:
>> litlle girl wrote:
>>> AFE settings looks more stable:
>>>
>>> grep "\[gt68xx\] afe" ./*
>>> ./color-1.log:[gt68xx] afe 0x0f 0x04 0x10 0x05 0x0f 0x04
>>> ./color-2.log:[gt68xx]
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-29 20:22:23 +0200, litlle girl gmail.com> wrote:
>> flatbed scanners are scanning moving head forward,
>> there in no reason to loose time on moving head backward useles,
>> next page can be scanned at head backward move,
>> and then fliped horizontally.
Hi all,
ExactImage 0.6(.0) now comes with an revamped PDF writer and hocr2pdf
front-end, together with a patch to cuneiform to annotate each
recognized
glyph with a hOCR-like bounding box, it allows the creation of pretty
exactly positioned, searchable PDF files:
ExactImage:
http://www.exac
Hi,
I have not forgotten your ACK :-) It's just the incredibly high
workload these days
(e.g. see Cuneiform / ExactImage, not to forget the T2 SDE :-)
I'll try to get some free Sunday soon to look at the Debian services
and our
automated scripts.
Yours,
Ren?
On 29.08.2008 at 17:17 m. all
Hi,
>> Binary incompatible and breaking would be silently data corruption or
>> no longer starting due to missing symbols etc.
>
> pseudocode:
>
> ret = sane_start()
> if(ret){
> die("bad status");
> }
>
> that works in sane 1.0, and fails in sane 1.1, both with the original
> binary, and with a
If there are just tiny, very light lines then there
is probably dust on the CCD glass, you can wipe it
clean with air or some clean soft towel.
Jacques Verhagen wrote:
> I have the same problem,
>
> It is not a Sane or Linux problem.
> With XP as os I get the same results
> I think it is a AV220
ed.
>
> Cheers,
> Gil
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>> Yeah - and you're still not using CVS ...
>>
>> AFAICS CVS is fine.
>>
>> On 25.11.2008, at 12:33, Zudio Solutions wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rene, this is how ima
Yes, I should update that page, latest code is in SANE CVS.
On 25.11.2008, at 14:03, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
> Hi Rene,
>
> I get a 404 for
>
> http://svn.exactcode.de/sane-avision/trunk/backend
>
> --
>
> Am Dienstag 25 November 2008 schrieb Rene Rebe:
>> IIR
No it isn't.
On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote:
> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very
> similar to fujitsu 4010CU. The avision backend is in need of a
> maintainer...
>
> allan
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Bryan Ward wrote:
>> I have a Xerox Docu
On 08.04.2009, at 10:22, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> No it isn't.
>
> Oh, really? We are eagerly waiting for avision bugfixes to start
> flowing into CVS. There's a release coming, so now would be a good
> time to start.
>
Hi,
On 08.04.2009, at 10:53, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I do not know of any bug that needs fixing. Using a proper non-Debian
>
> You must be kidding. What about the various versions of the HP 7400
> that stopped working after 1.0.18, for
On 08.04.2009, at 11:31, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> There are 2 7400 flavors and I think booth do work. The other mail on
>> the
>> list today apparently also boils down to "the linux usb subsystem got
>> confused", so?
>
m. allan noah wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>> No it isn't.
>> On 08.04.2009, at 04:14, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>>> judging by the shell, I'd say thats really an Avision machine, very
>>> similar to fujitsu 4010CU. T
m. allan noah wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>> Brian- I am sorry your query opened such a can of worms, this sort of
>>> thing is rather irregular. Perhaps Rene can answer your questions, now
>>> that he is here.
>> Well, the DM5
On 27.04.2009, at 12:50, PaulFransen wrote:
> On Sunday 12/04/2009 12:13 ono at safe-mail.net wrote:
> ---
>> I can try something like SnoopyPro
>> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/usbsnoop/), much later. I just
>> left town
>> for (probably)
I do not write to you directly. You probably subscribed to the SANE
mailing list. Unsusribe there, thanks,
On 28.04.2009, at 10:02, John Cotter wrote:
> Hello,
> Can you please take me off your distribution list manually? I get
> about 30
> of these per day. The unsubscribe option below does
ASAP.
On 22.05.2009, at 16:15, m. allan noah wrote:
> yes- git is taking me some time to get used to, but it is growing on
> me :)
>
> allan
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>> Yeah, noticed.
>>
>> I'll have to try the new git repo
Yeah, noticed.
I'll have to try the new git repository. Though one could copy the ID
to the .desc manually, but I'll really try to auto-update it timely.
On 22.05.2009, at 16:05, m. allan noah wrote:
> We'll have to ask Rene (cc'd) to update the .desc- the script is
> external to sane...
>
> al
Hi,
can you please use the normal usbsnoop tool and not whatever
"*pro" tool you are using? For the normal tool poeple use since
ages I have decoding scripts a-hand.
I think it is this one:
http://benoit.papillault.free.fr/usbsnoop/doc.php.en
Yours,
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 23:56, Serge Lebl
On Sunday 23 April 2006 01:05, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> I am using FC5 with sane-backends 1.0.17 and each colour scan with my HP
> 7400c has a yellow column of width 2-3 mm on the leftmost side of the
> scanned image. I have scanned with an alternative piece of software and
> here this yellow stripe
Hi,
On Sunday 23 April 2006 13:02, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > Aside the stripe the image is completely fine? Does it only happen when
> > you scan the whole page? E.g. is due to some plastic on the side and the
> > other software just allow scanning a smaller region? Or does it happen
> > for scans
Hi,
On Sunday 23 April 2006 23:28, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 April 2006 13:02, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >>> Aside the stripe the image is completely fine? Does it only happen when
> >>> you scan the whole page? E.g. is due to some plastic on the side and
> >>> the other software just al
Hi,
On Friday 21 April 2006 09:51, Serge Leblanc wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 19:04 +0200, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you please use the normal usbsnoop tool and not whatever
> > "*pro" tool you are using? For the normal tool poeple use since
&g
Hi,
On Friday 21 April 2006 09:51, Serge Leblanc wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 19:04 +0200, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you please use the normal usbsnoop tool and not whatever
> > "*pro" tool you are using? For the normal tool poeple use since
&g
On Saturday 13 May 2006 20:53, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> fi-4010CU
Most probably Avision. Can you try adding the ID into the avision backend
and give it a try? A USB snoop of the window driver would be nice as well.
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
Hi,
On Sunday 14 May 2006 04:39, Greg Furmanek wrote:
> Hi gang :-)
>
> I have been lurking on the list for quite some time. There are a
> lot of good info
> I got from you guys. I am just wondering if you have any
> recommendations when
> it comes to open source OCR libraries. It would be
On Monday 22 May 2006 20:50, moiti...@civil.ist.utl.pt wrote:
> > Hello Rene,
> > hello list,
> >
> > thanks for your answers.
> > At first i have deleted the hpusbsci in /lib/modules/2.4.31/kernel/
> > I have donwloaded the avision.c and avision.h of the svn repository of
> > the avision-backe
On Wednesday 24 May 2006 02:24, Wittawat Yamwong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why is usb_clear_halt() called unconditionally when usb_interrupt_read()
> returns an error? A possible error can be -ETIMEDOUT for example and in
> this case there is no need to call usb_clear_halt(). I've a problem that
> interrupt
Hi,
> From your first log we can see that the scanner is recognised. It sees that
> there is no film holder, it waits for the lamp to warm up, all perfect, and
> then it starts the calibration process. Everything seems to be ok, until we
> get to the portion that I am attaching. There we start hav
Hi,
as soon as I get a Avision based Minolta Elite 5400 which also has
a infrared channel I plan to add such support to the avision backend.
The data processing will (e.g. dust removal) will be most probably
added to the image library exact-image:
http://www.exactcode.de/oss/exact-image/
I'll
Hi,
any reason why the ChangeLog lists an old date for this commit?
1.2925 (ellert-g 06-Jun-06): 2006-05-26 Mattias Ellert
1.2925 (ellert-g 06-Jun-06):
1.2925 (ellert-g 06-Jun-06): * po/Makefile.in,
po/sane-backends.*.po: updated with translation
1.2925 (ellert-g
Hi,
sorry for the delay.
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 10:36, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> > Using the version in the package (build 182) I had problems that seemed
> > very similar to your log, but with a (much) older version (build 99) I
> > could a scan without problems. From files that I
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 19:35, m. allan noah wrote:
> > As far as I know, xsane automatically calculates and downloads a gamma
> > table for brightness / contrast / gamma if the backend advertises it.
>
> interesting! do you know of a backend that does this? i would like to see
> the option s
Hi,
some Avision AV600 or AV610. They are of reasonable high quality and scan even
faster.
And Avision is a very supporting company when it comes to Windows alternative
drivers.
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-
Hi,
On Monday 24 July 2006 02:20, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> The ADF should be supported out of the box (assuming you use our RPMs,
> that is). BTW, our backend does NOT support scanning at resolutions
> larger than 3200dpi.
And are as binary only as the alc1100 CUPS driver that includes a GPL
b
On Monday 18 September 2006 18:26, Bertrik Sikken wrote:
> Tera Holler wrote:
> > Is hp scanjet 8290 unsupported? I would like to connect it to a HP
> > B2600 running hp-ux 11.11.
>
> I have no practical experience with this scanner, but the
> sane-project.org backend search engine says:
> http://
On Thursday 16 November 2006 14:19, Farley S. Kalp wrote:
> Can anyone get the workcentre m950 to work with linux?
If you have such a device you can dump the Windows driver i/o and send it to
me. I could tell you whether it is Avision based then.
Yours,
--
Ren? Rebe - ExactCODE - Berlin (Eur
Hi,
On Saturday 13 January 2007 10:20, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> John wrote:
> > I have a Minolta dimage III positive film scanner, which can take 4
> > positive frames at once.
> >
> > I have not been able to find any good software to use with this scanner.
> > Does anyone have a good hint?
>
> If y
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 19:38:58 Felix E. Klee wrote:
> At Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:52:55 +0100,
> Jens Gulden wrote:
> > - BUT: it scans right to one edge. Plustek claims to even have
> > patented this "invention"...
>
> You must've misunderstood me: I need a scanner that can scan right to
> the
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 12:57:16 Felix E. Klee wrote:
> At Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:03:00 +0100,
> Rene Rebe wrote:
> > > You must've misunderstood me: I need a scanner that can scan right
> > > to the edge of the *glass plate*. In fact, before getting the Eps
Hi,
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 14:22:34 Felix E. Klee wrote:
> > > If I do not find such a scanner, I may have to build a stencil that
> > > I can put on my current scanner. Actually, this should not be too
> > > hard. I'm annoyed however, that this step is necessary. Why didn't
> > > Epson
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 23:30:37 Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> > I need to scan visitors' plastic/laminate identification cards. The scans
> > are to be initiated via web app, signalling a headless SANE linux server
> > to scan via scanadf, network scanning, python PIL/sane, etc.
On Thursday 29 March 2007 19:44:45 Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> m. allan noah wrote:
> > the kodak i30 and i40 are rebadged avision av200's, and i think
> > visioneer sells one too. i had a kodak i40 here for awhile, it works ok
> > with sane, but there were some 'pausing' or timeout issues when you
> >
Hi,
thanks, I'll go over them. Btw. nowadays virtually everyone rather
prefers unified diffs (diff -u) - but I can of course also read those :-)
On Monday 23 July 2007 16:25, David Solomon wrote:
> Here are the diffs:
>
> rx30 at dsolomon-devbox:~/nslu2/downloads/temp/sane-backends-1.0.18/backen
Have you counted thru how many developers are willing to rewrite
their code (backends, frontends, etc.) for this arbitrarily defined SANE
2 "thing" ?
My votes still are: preferably compatibly change SANE 1 or adopt
TWAIN for Linux.
On 27.03.2008, at 18:22, stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> be
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 09:16, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:52:51 +0100
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
>> Have you counted thru how many developers are willing to rewrite
>> their code (backends, frontends, etc.) for this arbitrarily defined
>> SANE
>>
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 11:52, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:34:22 +0100
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
>>
>>> I believe that Stef has made very clear its intentions
>>> to go toward SANE 2. TWAIn for linux would be a complete
>>> rewrite of e
Hi Allan,
On 28.03.2008, at 14:46, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:22 PM, stef wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>before any work can start on SANE 2, the current proposal
>> has to be completed.
>
> and before we can complete it, we must acknowlege that it has not been
> to
Yours,
Ren?
> Best regards
> Oliver
>
> Am Freitag, den 28.03.2008, 08:52 +0100 schrieb Rene Rebe:
>> Have you counted thru how many developers are willing to rewrite
>> their code (backends, frontends, etc.) for this arbitrarily defined
>> SANE
>> 2 "th
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 18:40, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>>- scanner's button handling
>>
>> this is overly complicated, and should be re-examined.
>
> For that and other reasons, I think it'd really be better to have the
> frontends be entirely isolated from
On 28.03.2008, at 19:02, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:49:17 +0100
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
>>
>> Right now the only thing I miss are marks for infra-red frames, and
>> maybe
>> a ability to pass duplex data without buffering the rear side, w
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 19:09, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> ?tienne Bersac wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Do you mean having some cups for scanner ?
>
> Something much more simple than CUPS, but yeah, basically.
>
>> Actually, i wish not, because users don't want another service. HAL
>> can
>> launch addon per d
Hi,
On 28.03.2008, at 19:13, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Sounds a bit Data Source Manager like-ish (in TWAIN terms), definetly
>> and idea for desktops.
>
> Yes. From what you told about TWAIN the other day, I think I like the
> archit
On 28.03.2008, at 19:19, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>
>> On 28.03.2008, at 19:02, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:49:17 +0100
>>> Rene Rebe wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>
On 28.03.2008, at 19:34, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Rene Rebe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.03.2008, at 19:19, m. allan noah wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Rene Rebe
>>> wrote:
>>&g
On 28.03.2008, at 21:56, stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that the real question is what do we want for SANE future ?
>
> 1 - the current situation is perfectly fine, don't need to change a
> thing.
>
> 2 - only a couple of new image formats are needed, simply evolve a
Hi,
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 14:06, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Rene Rebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 02 October 2006 20:19, m. allan noah wrote:
> >> in order to get the kodak i40 (clone of av-220?) working with the
> >> avisi
Hi,
On Friday 06 October 2006 07:43, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Alexandre Averyanov writes:
> > I have purchased a Subj. This model is new one and not
> > supported by SANE yet but I hope it's similar to
> > Epson Perfection 3490/3590.
>
> It is not.
When we have such a pretty supported device pa
On Friday 06 October 2006 13:32, m. allan noah wrote:
> many scanners have internal limits on the length of a scan. even the
> high-dollar fujitsus usually have a 35 inch limit. this is not a driver
> problem, but a scanner firmware problem. you may be able to find some
> particular scanner that do
Hi,
On Friday 13 October 2006 02:47, Wolfram Heider wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:05:00 +0200, m. allan noah
>
> wrote:
> > fujitsu S500, or fi-5110C (or EOX derivatives)
> >
> > allan
>
> The Canon DR 1210C isn't in the list, so it may be unsupported. The HP
> scanjet is labelled unsupported.
Hi.
Yesterday I released a new version of the Avision backend. I go
positive as well as negative feedback from hp5370c people. So it might
work for some scan-windows - but not for all.
Here is (again) the content of the email:
Important: I'm currently only connected via an old v.90 modem using a
Hi all.
I just updated the avision backend homepage, to include a more
complete list of supported scanners:
http://drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/avision/index.html
There are also Fujitsu and Mitsubishi scanners in the list which wanna
get tested. (Most of the nes IDs are obtained from "string
avisi
Hi all.
During the CeBIT I found out that the UMAX Astra 4500, 6700 are also
Avision OEM scanners.
They do not have the firmware in an EPROM. The scanner-driver needs to
upload it into the scanner after each power-off.
I hope that Avision provides me with additional information to get the
HP 537
Hi.
Sorry for the late answer - I was away at LinuxTag ...
In the Avision backend is only support ADF with sheet-feed
scanenrs. I'll take a look what is needed to control the ADF unit of
your scanner.
Btw. Does the latest (2002-06-04-2141) Avisin release work for you?
Which release are you
Hi.
Could the HP scanner people please Cc: me if they send bug-reports? It
was pure luch that I open sane folder today ...
On: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:29:15 +0200,
Laszlo Fodor wrote:
> hi,
> now with attachments :)
;-)
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to set up an HP 7450c scanner on
> my Solaris 8 box
Hi.
I just started to read over your log:
(Version: 1.0 Build: 27)
The actual version is 1.0 Build: 36 (... ;-)
The Avision homepage is:
http://drocklinux.dyndns.org/rene/avision/
And the new backend version can be obtained from:
http://www.rocklinux.org/people/rene/sane/
http://www.roc
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
