Henning,
thanks for this it made a great deal of difference in the compilation
time
and still gave me the results I wanted.
I know the group have taken the decision to not allow the configure
option
to select which drivers are used but I have to say that the reasoning I've
hear
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:42:38PM +, jim.geo...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> > However one comment you made worried me...compilation taking minutes
> > or seconds? Mine ran for hours literaly 2-3 hours! I have a Pentium
> > III with 2
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Oliver Rauch wrote:
> jim.geo...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > Oliver,
> >
> > fair enough I wasn't aware the conversation had already taken place,
> > although I suppose I should have guessed.
> >
> > However one comment you made worried me...compilation tak
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:42:38PM +, jim.geo...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> However one comment you made worried me...compilation taking minutes
> or seconds? Mine ran for hours literaly 2-3 hours! I have a Pentium
> III with 288MB.
Looks suspicous. I just tried with my Athlon 1.4:
: cd
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:21:25AM +, jim.geo...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> Would it not be possible to have the same option in sane so that I
> didn't have to compile all back-ends and man pages but could instead enter
> ./configure --with-backends=mustek_pp,pnm,gphoto2 ? Or have I
Oliver,
fair enough I wasn't aware the conversation had already taken place,
although I suppose I should have guessed.
However one comment you made worried me...compilation taking minutes
or seconds? Mine ran for hours literaly 2-3 hours! I have a Pentium III with
288MB.
Folks,
I'm just going through the process of compiling the sane CVS version
so as to be able to have gphoto2 support as well.
Having recently successfully completed the gphoto2 compilation (with
support) I've noticed that they allow you to specify the drivers that you
want support
