Hello,
David, David, Markus, Jens, George
I hope you don't mind that I included you in this thread
which is about a new/enhanced standard to access scanners.
At least I would like to have you informed, see the
"SANE2, time for a decision" thread on
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-de
On Monday 08 January 2007 19:28, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> I also think we should setup a more or less small
> group of developers who are willing to help Oliver
> to finish the sane2 standard. [...]
> During this time the team around Oliver should
> be found and they could start with their work.
A
Hi everybody,
> I also think we should setup a more or less small
> group of developers who are willing to help Oliver
> to finish the sane2 standard. We might should setup
> a list of stuff that should also go into this new
> standard - this list should be more or less a whishlist,
> which means
On Sunday 07 January 2007 20:04, Martin Owens wrote:
> Toy might want to look at Enlightened Absolutism; because democracy
> doesn't work for software development. to inefficient.
full ack.
[SNIPSNAP]
I also think we should setup a more or less small
group of developers who are willing to help O
Toy might want to look at Enlightened Absolutism; because democracy
doesn't work for software development. to inefficient.
If you want to develop a standard, do so; don't search for consensus
you only have to put it in public eyes for scrutiny, this doesn't stop
the development of driven people.
I think he meant that a small group of invested and motivated people
would be able to make a lot faster progress rather than having to put
every idea to a vote rather than saying that most people aren't
qualified to participate. A republic vs. a democracy vs. benevolent
dictatorship if you will
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Oliver Rauch wrote:
[snip]
> The SANE2 standard is not finished, so it does not make sens to start coding
> SANE2. It would be a big mistake to start coding SANE2 at this point because
> the standard is not finished and will change.
[snip]
> I spent a lot of time in the SANE
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:31:03 +0100
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Alessandro Zummo wrote:
>
> > A fork will inevitably lead to more features
> > and that might as well turn into sane2.
>
> Or to an utter failure.
>
> You need to calm down and think this through.
>
> Henning told you that already,
Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> A fork will inevitably lead to more features
> and that might as well turn into sane2.
Or to an utter failure.
You need to calm down and think this through.
Henning told you that already, Oliver just told you that too. Are you
going to start listening, or continue b
Am Samstag, 6. Januar 2007 20:39 schrieben Sie:
> > This way we could have finished the standard in about 8-12 weeks.
> >
> > After that we could start coding SANE2. And when this standard is worth
> > to support it then there will be coders for sanei-code and for frontends.
>
> I do agree on the
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:09:08 +0100
Frank Zago wrote:
> > The poll options will be:
> >
> > - Reopen development on SANE1
> > - Fork SANE1
> > - Wait SANE2 indefinitely
> >
> Or "evolve a fork of SANE1 into SANE2".
A fork will inevitably lead to more features
and that might as well turn
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 17:15:03 +0100 (MET)
Oliver Rauch wrote:
>
> The SANE2 standard is not finished, so it does not make sens to start coding
> SANE2. It would be a big mistake to start coding SANE2 at this point because
> the standard is not finished and will change.
>
> What should be done i
Hello Alessandro Zummo,
> Hello sane developers,
>
> Some weeks ago I introduced (once again) the discussion
> about SANE future. Now is time to take action.
>
> The situation is that we have coders willing to implement
> the SANE2 standard (whatever this will be) for a bunch of backends
>
Am Samstag, 6. Januar 2007 16:19 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
> The poll options will be:
>
> - Reopen development on SANE1
> - Fork SANE1
> - Wait SANE2 indefinitely
The SANE2 standard is not finished, so it does not make sens to start coding
SANE2. It would be a big mistake to start coding S
Hello sane developers,
Some weeks ago I introduced (once again) the discussion
about SANE future. Now is time to take action.
The situation is that we have coders willing to implement
the SANE2 standard (whatever this will be) for a bunch of backends
but are missing the people required
15 matches
Mail list logo
