Hi,
I already got this report and check it here on my box...
Ciao,
Gerhard
On Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 09:31, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> Noah Daniels wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm still having the same problem with the plustek backend that several
> > people have reported, even using this latest buil
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2004 20:17, Noah Daniels wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
> Basically, sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, but scanimage -L does not.
> However, if I set SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK to a high number, the scanner DOES
> start working, and scans a partial low-res image before hanging. I know
>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--050409050009020202060209
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Noah Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still having the same problem with the plustek backend that several
> people have report
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:17:24PM -0500, Noah Daniels wrote:
> Basically, sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, but scanimage -L does
> not. However, if I set SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK to a high number, the
> scanner DOES start working, and scans a partial low-res image before
> hanging. I know this
Hi,
I'm still having the same problem with the plustek backend that several people
have reported, even using this latest build of the various SANE packages.
Basically, sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, but scanimage -L does not.
However, if I set SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK to a high number, the scan
