Hi, I already got this report and check it here on my box...
Ciao, Gerhard On Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 09:31, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Noah Daniels wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm still having the same problem with the plustek backend that several > > people have reported, even using this latest build of the various SANE > > packages. > > > > Basically, sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, but scanimage -L does > > not. However, if I set SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK to a high number, the scanner > > DOES start working, and scans a partial low-res image before hanging. I > > know this behavior has been reported before, by Henrik Rintala. > > > > I can provide a debug log if anyone's interested... I'd love to be able > > to get this working (printing to a Canoscan 650). > > > > thanks! > > > > -- > > Noah Daniels > > Using the latest version of libusb from CVS (or the binary packages from > 2004-01-05) has been reported to fix the problem that scanimage -L does > not see the scanner unless the DEBUG environment is used. > > The following gdb log of the state of scanimage at the time it freezes > after a scan was provided by a user having a Canon N670U scanner that > uses the Plustek backend on MacOS X. > > To me it looks like the reader process has finished and is waiting to be > killed, but the main process is still trying to read from it. > > Note that the patch in the bug report > https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=300434&group_id >=1308&atid=410366 > > has been applied here, in order to avoid calling pthread_cancel which is > broken on MacOS X. > > Mattias
