[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-25 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, > > Lineart and grayscale should be fixable. I've commited a fix to CVS, please test. > What does the snapscan backend for halftoning? Are there halftoning > algorithms implemented in software or does it only pass a flag to > the scanner? I'm asking this because there is a kind of halftonin

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-23 Thread Levente Novák
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 00:11 +0100, Oliver Schwartz wrote: > > ah, ok. That makes more sense. I guess I'll disable 2400 dpi to make > sure the error doesn't occur. > 1600 dpi seems to work OK. Oliver, did you receive my previous post in which I've tested almost all possible combinations of reso

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-18 Thread Martin Collins
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:07:51 +0100 patrick deflandre wrote: > Hum, I understand I've made a mistake. But which editor handle 16 > bits by color ? > I've tried several graphics editor with no success. Cinepaint, formerly called filmgimp. Martin

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-18 Thread patrick deflandre
Oliver Schwartz a ?crit : > > >>But for me the 16 bit depth doesn't work. If I try to open the file >>with gimp, the following message is displayed : >> >>PNM : invalid intensity maximum value > > > That's a gimp problem. AFAIK gimp still can't handle more than 8 > bits/color. > > /Oliver >

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-17 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, > I confirm the 3200 dpi works well for me, and there isn't any > interlacing problems. I apologise for my previous message which was > not enough clear. > > In fact, it seem's that if I do a 2400 dpi scan which does not > work, then the following 3200 dpi scan are bad. But it works again > if

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-17 Thread patrick deflandre
Levente Nov?k a ?crit : > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:13 +0100, Oliver Schwartz wrote: > > >>I've now adapted the quality calibration code for the 2480 and enabled >>it for the 3490. It's a pitty that you solved the problem already ;-) >>otherwise it would be nice to know if quality calibration so

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-17 Thread Levente Novák
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:13 +0100, Oliver Schwartz wrote: > > I've now adapted the quality calibration code for the 2480 and enabled > it for the 3490. It's a pitty that you solved the problem already ;-) > otherwise it would be nice to know if quality calibration solves it, > too > > The co

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-16 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, > - at 2400 dpi : > I have done several try, at least a dozen. > Sometimes it's all dark, sometimes all white, sometimes a > succession of colored bands, and sometimes I have a good scanning, > but at least it doesn't scale the entire selection I have made on > the preview screen. And I have a

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-16 Thread patrick deflandre
Oliver Schwartz a ?crit : > Hi, > > I've now adapted the quality calibration code for the 2480 and enabled > it for the 3490. It's a pitty that you solved the problem already ;-) > otherwise it would be nice to know if quality calibration solves it, > too > > The code is in CVS now, it should

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-15 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, > I don't think the sensors is defective, because it works very well > on Windows2000 with the Epson software. And I have try the quality > calibration with no result. Hm - I don't think so. Quality calibration (i.e. the option named "Quality calibration", not "Quality scan") was disabled fo

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-15 Thread patrick deflandre
Levente Nov?k a ?crit : >>>- dirt on the calibration stripe or windows. Even a small dark spot on >>> the area where shading correction is done could have a big impact, as >>> it gets applied over and over for the whole scan height. >>> >> >>This is a possibility. I will check this as soon as pos

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-15 Thread plum.pudd...@free.fr
Selon Levente Nov?k : > > Two vague ideas (if the green line is vertical): > > - defective sensors (maybe a quality calibration would help a bit) I don't think the sensors is defective, because it works very well on Windows2000 with the Epson software. And I have try the quality calibration with

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-15 Thread patrick DEFLANDRE
Selon Oliver Schwartz : > Thanks. Some more questions: > > - Is the green line always at the same place? Yes, the green line is always at the same place. > - Is it also present if you only select a small region in the middle > of the preview? The line is also visible on a preview. If I select o

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-14 Thread patrick deflandre
m. allan noah a ?crit : > > Should it be due to my installation : I've make and installed the > cvs code > in /usr/local without uninstalling the debian version which is in /usr > In order to use Kooka (KDE scanner prog) I start it from a console with LD_PRELOAD=/us

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-14 Thread m. allan noah
Should it be due to my installation : I've make and installed the cvs code in /usr/local without uninstalling the debian version which is in /usr >>> In order to use Kooka (KDE scanner prog) I start it from a console with >>> >>> LD_PRELOAD=/usr/local/lib/libsane.so kooka >>

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-14 Thread Theodoros V. Kalamatianos
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 plum.pudd...@free.fr wrote: > Selon Jim MacLeod : > >>> So we use the same backend and firmware with a different result. >>> >>> Should it be due to my installation : I've make and installed the cvs code >>> in /usr/local without uninstalling the debian version which is in /usr

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-14 Thread plum.pudd...@free.fr
Selon Jim MacLeod : > > So we use the same backend and firmware with a different result. > > > > Should it be due to my installation : I've make and installed the cvs code > > in /usr/local without uninstalling the debian version which is in /usr > > > In order to use Kooka (KDE scanner prog) I st

[sane-devel] Re: Re: Re: epson 3490 - transparency unit problem

2005-11-14 Thread Jim MacLeod
plum.pudd...@free.fr wrote: > So we use the same backend and firmware with a different result. > > Should it be due to my installation : I've make and installed the cvs code > in /usr/local without uninstalling the debian version which is in /usr > In order to use Kooka (KDE scanner prog) I start