Hi,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 05:13:30PM +0200, Jens Luedicke wrote:
> After some reading in the mailing list archives, I found out a lot of
> people started trying to get this backend work, but why didn't anyone
> succeed yet? Is it because they underestimated the difficulties and gave
> in? Or ju
Stéphane VOLTZ wrote:
>Le Dimanche 12 Juin 2005 12:53, Nikolas Arend a écrit :
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Following the status-update posts I'm not quite clear about the status
>>of the gl841 part of the backend. Does it do s.th. yet and are scanners
>>with
>>that chipset already supposed to be recognized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
this should have been sent to the list directly
- Original Message
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Re: Genesys experimental status update
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:02:51 +0200
From: Tom Mercelis
To: Jens Luedicke
References
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nikolas Arend wrote:
> Following the status-update posts I'm not quite clear about the status
> of the gl841 part of the backend. Does it do s.th. yet and are scanners
> with
> that chipset already supposed to be recognized? I checked out the
> experi
Le Dimanche 12 Juin 2005 12:53, Nikolas Arend a =E9crit=A0:
> Hi,
>
> Following the status-update posts I'm not quite clear about the status
> of the gl841 part of the backend. Does it do s.th. yet and are scanners
> with
> that chipset already supposed to be recognized? I checked out the
> experi
Stéphane VOLTZ wrote:
>Hello,
>
>here's the status of the genesys experimental backend:
>- full support for HP2300C : 1200, 600, 300, 150 and 75 dpi at 8 or
> 16 bits, in color, grey or lineart mode
>- full support for MD5345/MD6228/MD6471 : 2400, 1200, 600, 500, 4
