Alexander Meijer writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
Sorry for the late follow-up.
> I have the same scanner and the same problem.
> I recently moved from XP to Ubuntu, (XP gave perfect white scans)
> is there a final solution for this 'blue problem' in Ubuntu ?
This is a known limitation of the epkowa backend
Hi,
I have the same scanner and the same problem.
I recently moved from XP to Ubuntu, (XP gave perfect white scans)
is there a final solution for this 'blue problem' in Ubuntu ?
thanks
Alexander
On 12/05/12 16:08, K?re S?rs wrote:
>
>> 2. After correction (+10% brightness& +10% contrast could be about
>> right) then impossible to select the scan area for a document, which
>> then appears as numerous fragments...
> That sounds like a bug somewhere... could the fragments be automatically
>
On Saturday 12 May 2012 13:57:22 2cv67 wrote:
> On 11/05/12 23:22, K?re S?rs wrote:
> > With the latest release of Skanlite (0.8), all the settings are saved on
> > exit and loaded the next time you start. So if you change color
> > correction settings they will be the same the next time you run Sk
On 11/05/12 23:22, K?re S?rs wrote:
>
> With the latest release of Skanlite (0.8), all the settings are saved on exit
> and loaded the next time you start. So if you change color correction settings
> they will be the same the next time you run Skanlite (they can be reverted to
> defaults). I think
Hi,
On Friday 11 May 2012 22:13:22 2cv67 wrote:
> On 10/05/12 01:43, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > You may get improved results with Image Scan! for Linux when selecting
> > Color Document (or B/W Document) for the Image Type.
> >
> > This white correction is not done by the device. It is all done
On 10/05/12 01:43, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
> You may get improved results with Image Scan! for Linux when selecting
> Color Document (or B/W Document) for the Image Type.
>
> This white correction is not done by the device. It is all done in a
> non-free software component used by the iscan front
Le 10/05/2012 01:43, Olaf Meeuwissen a ?crit :
> You may get improved results with Image Scan! for Linux when selecting
> Color Document (or B/W Document) for the Image Type.
>
> This white correction is not done by the device. It is all done in a
> non-free software component used by the iscan fr
"emmanuel.michel at wanadoo.fr" writes:
> Le 09/05/2012 10:21, 2cv67 a ?crit :
>> These are the examples used in the above post:
>> Uncorrected:
>> http://s838.photobucket.com/albums/zz309/2CV67/?action=view¤t=xs_normal.jpg
>>
>> Corrected:
>> http://s838.photobucket.com/albums/zz309/2CV67/?actio
Le 09/05/2012 10:21, 2cv67 a ?crit :
> These are the examples used in the above post:
> Uncorrected:
> http://s838.photobucket.com/albums/zz309/2CV67/?action=view¤t=xs_normal.jpg
>
> Corrected:
> http://s838.photobucket.com/albums/zz309/2CV67/?action=view¤t=xs_white.jpg
>
>
> Or did you want them a
On 08/05/12 21:36, emmanuel.michel at wanadoo.fr wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't have quality equipment, calibrated monitor or
> stuff like that to confirm your problem. If white is not perfect, at
> least it does not look "noticeably blue" on my screen.
>
> Can you please send one of your "white"
Le 08/05/2012 21:19, 2cv67 a ?crit :
> I asked this question a long time ago on Ubuntu Forum, with no result.
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1576401
> Probably this is a more suitable spot?
>
> I have an Epson Perfection V200 Photo scanner.
>
> It works as you would expect in XP, whites
I asked this question a long time ago on Ubuntu Forum, with no result.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1576401
Probably this is a more suitable spot?
I have an Epson Perfection V200 Photo scanner.
It works as you would expect in XP, whites come out white, automatically.
In Ubuntu (10.04
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> * Ivan Boldyrev [2009-02-12 15:44] :
> Why do you want to reinvent the wheel if there exists already a working
> driver?
>
> http://www.avasys.jp/english/linux_e/dl_scan.html
I'm glad you asked!
I don't know if "a working driver" (I have
* Ivan Boldyrev [2009-02-16 13:06] :
> I'm glad you asked!
>
> I don't know if "a working driver" (I haven't tried it yet) would be
> released 3 days ago if I hadn't started reverse-engineering the
> scanner protocol. Most probably it is just a coincidence that Olaf
> announced it in next m
* Ivan Boldyrev [2009-02-12 15:44] :
> I have written some Python code for testing reverse-engineered protocol. I
> don't particulary like Python, but it has libusb bindings.
>
> [...]
>
> I still cannot handle some packet that is different on each scan (scanning
> parameters -- window, dpi
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Stefan Wimmer wrote:
> * Ivan Boldyrev [2009-02-12 15:44] :
>> I have written some Python code for testing reverse-engineered protocol. I
>> don't particulary like Python, but it has libusb bindings.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I still cannot handle some packet that is d
I have written some Python code for testing reverse-engineered
protocol. I don't particulary like Python, but it has libusb
bindings.
Today I have wrote first version able to scan something. It has
severe limitations:
0. Image quality is poor.
1. Scanner hangs up after scanning, you have to unpl
Torquil Macdonald S?rensen writes:
> Ok, thanks. And I guess the "sane-find-scanner" just tries to identify
> any scanner connected to the system, regardless of sane supporting it or
> not.
You guessed correctly.
> Then I will try some more to get the 32-bit iscan program working on the
> 64
Ok, thanks. And I guess the "sane-find-scanner" just tries to identify
any scanner connected to the system, regardless of sane supporting it or
not.
Then I will try some more to get the 32-bit iscan program working on the
64-bit computer with 64-bit ubuntu. I'd rather not have to install a
sep
There is no backend in cvs for this machine. If you cannot get
satisfaction from the epkowa software, perhaps you could offer a
bounty or hardware for reverse engineering?
allan
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Torquil Macdonald S?rensen
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a 64bit computer with Ubuntu 8.04
Hi!
I have a 64bit computer with Ubuntu 8.04 on it, and I'm trying to get an
Epson Perfection V200 Photo to work.
Could I ask what the significance is of why sane-find-scanner finds my
scanner, but not scanimage -L ?
libsane-extras in installed, and this is ubuntu 8.04. I have tried
various m
Tourneur Henry-Nicolas writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to know if the V200 scanner run with sane and eventually the
> package libsane-extras (available in Debian, provide epkowa) or I'm obliged
> to use iscan ?
You are not obliged to use iscan. If libsane-extras includes the
plugi
Hello everybody,
I would like to know if the V200 scanner run with sane and eventually the
package libsane-extras (available in Debian, provide epkowa) or I'm obliged
to use iscan ?
I would like to use Kooka with this scanner, as it is a frontend, I
supposed
that there is no problem ?
24 matches
Mail list logo
