* Olaf Meeuwissen [May 09. 2016 15:10]:
>
> Alessandro Zummo writes:
>
> > On Mon, 02 May 2016 11:57:58 +0900
> > Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> >
> >> That leaves zero flags to be passed, so the mkostemp() call reduces to
> >> mkstemp().
> >>
> >> I would simply call mkstemp() unconditionally. Tha
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> On Mon, 02 May 2016 11:57:58 +0900
> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>
>> That leaves zero flags to be passed, so the mkostemp() call reduces to
>> mkstemp().
>>
>> I would simply call mkstemp() unconditionally. That way you also don't
>> have to add it to AC_CHEC_FUNCS() in
On Mon, 02 May 2016 11:57:58 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> That leaves zero flags to be passed, so the mkostemp() call reduces to
> mkstemp().
>
> I would simply call mkstemp() unconditionally. That way you also don't
> have to add it to AC_CHEC_FUNCS() in configure.in anymore.
I agree with
Alessandro Zummo writes:
> Some platforms have no mksotemp, the following
> patch should solve that.
>
> However my autoconf won't generate a correct configure
> (it removes the INCLUDES statement), so I have omitted it
>
> diff --git a/backend/pieusb_buffer.c b/backend/pieusb_buffer.c
> ind
Some platforms have no mksotemp, the following
patch should solve that.
However my autoconf won't generate a correct configure
(it removes the INCLUDES statement), so I have omitted it
diff --git a/backend/pieusb_buffer.c b/backend/pieusb_buffer.c
index 0718238..9a04de9 100644
--- a/backen
