* Olaf Meeuwissen <paddy-h...@member.fsf.org> [May 09. 2016 15:10]: > > Alessandro Zummo writes: > > > On Mon, 02 May 2016 11:57:58 +0900 > > Olaf Meeuwissen <paddy-h...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > > > >> That leaves zero flags to be passed, so the mkostemp() call reduces to > >> mkstemp(). > >> > >> I would simply call mkstemp() unconditionally. That way you also don't > >> have to add it to AC_CHEC_FUNCS() in configure.in anymore. > > > > I agree with you, but not being the original > > author I didn't want to remove it all :) > > Simplicity is a virtue. There is no benefit in making the code more > convoluted than necessary. Just call mkstemp() unconditionally. If > you write a commit message that documents the rationale, I doubt the > original author will complain.
:-) No worries, just go ahead ! Klaus -- SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
