Hello,
I've been waiting for a backend for my scanner for almost 2 years and
finally realised, that I can do better than just sit and wait.
According to what I've read in archives of this group it looks like
there are some people interested in development of this backend, but
they lack help. So if
s you predicted this recovered my lost dark colors. Where
should I go from here? Should I crank up SANE_DEBUG_GENESYS and send you the
scanimage output and *.pnm files?
Thanks, Luke
On 3/7/06, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
>
> > - Color reproduction is better with the sane driver than the windows
any ideas for other places I might look?
Luke
years old.
Ah, thanks. I should have thought of that. I clearly didn't uninstall
the old stuff properly. It'll be slightly tricky, I see from a quick
try, since kdegraphics-2.2.2-4 depends on libsane.so.1, so I'll have to
bypass rpm. :-)
Many thanks, Henning!
luke
scanner?!
Apologies if these are dumb questions.
> As Gerhard already mentioned:
> "NOTE: before compiling, always do a touch backend/plustek.c to make sure
> the backend gets compiled..."
>
> > So I think I'm a bit out of my depth now, since I don't understand how
> > plustek-usbdevs.c gets compiled (it only appears in the DISTFILES list).
>
> It's #included in the backend file.
Oh. Shouldn't these dependencies appear in the backend/Makefile along
with the others?
Thanks for your help so far (and Gerhard's too)!
luke
ystem directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../sanei/libsanei.a', needed by
`xscanimage'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/luke/linux/scanner/sane-frontends/src'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
Perhaps that was because I just did a "make install", and sho
> is
> broken for some reason, and it emits really alarming noises upon starting a
> scan.
Thanks for the tip. I'll give it a try on the weekend and see how I go.
Is there an equivalent to usbsnoop for Linux and Mac? Then I could
compare the command sequences and report any differences to the list.
luke
r to the poster - scanimage -L reported no supported
devices, but sane-find-scanner sees it and gets the manufacturer and
model info correct.
luke
this business:
#ifdef SANE_DEBUG_LOG_RAW_DATA
static FILE *rawfile = NULL;
#endif
After setting that, everything works fine. Good work!
Luke
_available (data=0x81535d8, source=-1,
cond=GDK_INPUT_READ) at preview.c:577
#6 0x08052767 in scan_start (p=0x81535d8) at preview.c:958
#7 0x08053cc4 in preview_scan (p=0x81535d8) at preview.c:1500
Luke
y the latest patch you posted.
Luke
interfere with the work already being done?
Thanks,
Luke
y important messages because there are very many of them, and
their data strings change constantly. Furthermore, the gl841 spec doesn't
appear to have the USB protocol listed, so I'm at a loss here.. Where did you
find the control message values that are listed in genesys_low.h?
Luke
On January 18 2005 00:29, you wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2005 03:23, Luke Campagnola wrote:
> > I got a Canon LiDE 35 a while back without checking to see if it was
> > supported (I cleverly assumed that LiDE 30 support was good enough), and
> > rather than sending it bac
46 and the gl841, but I'm
worried about damaging the scanner. Does anybody know what things I should
look out for, and whether this scanner has any built-in protection?
Luke
15 matches
Mail list logo
