On Friday 19 June 2015 15:57:03 Marc Cousin wrote:
> On Thursday 30 April 2015 13:15:17 Marc Cousin wrote:
> > On 18/04/2015 18:46, Marc Cousin wrote:
> > > On 18/04/2015 18:27, Marc Cousin wrote:
> > >> On 18/04/2015 12:35, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> > >>
On Saturday 18 April 2015 10:58:31 Marc Cousin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a brand new computer with USB3 all over the place, and cannot
> use my "old" LIDE 110 with it, even with a git version. The scanner is
> still working, as it works when connecter to my older laptop, through
> USB2. It doesn't
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 22:08:17 Stef wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 16:32, m. allan noah wrote:
> > Stef actually made some commits for the LiDE 210 last night- are you
> > running those?
> >
> > allan
>
> Hello,
>
> unfortunately I don't have an usable USB3 port. However it might
> be in
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 17:23:43 Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2014 10:33:14 m. allan noah wrote:
> > I have just committed an attempted workaround for this Linux kernel
> > bug. I have tested with Fujitsu and Canon scanners, and it does fix
> > the probl
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 10:32:04 m. allan noah wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Heinz Wiesinger
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 December 2014 17:23:43 Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 16 December 2014 10:33:14 m. allan noah wrote:
> >> > I have ju
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 10:33:14 m. allan noah wrote:
> I have just committed an attempted workaround for this Linux kernel
> bug. I have tested with Fujitsu and Canon scanners, and it does fix
> the problem. I have not tested with other scanners. We need as much
> testing on this as we can get
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 22:39:44 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 08:58 PM, Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> > FWIW, I have sane-1.0.22 built with libusb_1 and my LiDE 210 works like
> > a charm.
>
> Hey, did you build it yourself or is it from distro? If the latter,
> whic
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 20:53:17 Stef wrote:
> Le mardi 15 novembre 2011 10:01:23 Jiri Slaby a ?crit :
> > On 11/15/2011 05:24 AM, Stef wrote:
> > > thanks for the debug data. I'll compare it with how my LiDE 110 is
> > >
> > > behaving. Are you running a 64 bit system ?
> >
> > Hi, yes, bu
On Thursday 17 March 2011 23:17:08 Michael George wrote:
> I just purchased a CanoScan LiDE 210 based on the supported devices list
> at http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-CANON. That scanner
> shows complete support with the genesys driver 1.0-62. I have 1.0.21
> installed on my system
On Friday 14 January 2011 06:33:22 stef wrote:
> > Hi,
> > According to Canon's webpage, the LiDE210 does have 4800x4800 optical
> > resolution:
> > http://www.canon.com.au/en-au/For-You/Faxes-Scanners/CanoScan-Scanners/Li
> > DE 210
> > http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Scanners/Flatb
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 21:05:09 you wrote:
> Le Wednesday 12 January 2011 08:41:55 Heinz Wiesinger, vous avez ?crit :
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2011 06:52:35 stef wrote:
> > > Le Wednesday 12 January 2011 00:21:35 Heinz Wiesinger, vous avez ?crit :
> > > > Hi!
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 06:52:35 stef wrote:
> Le Wednesday 12 January 2011 00:21:35 Heinz Wiesinger, vous avez ?crit :
> > Hi!
> >
> > I got myself a Canon LiDE 210 today and immediatly tried it with latest
> > git (922a22e). It was detected fine and it seems to w
Hi!
I got myself a Canon LiDE 210 today and immediatly tried it with latest git
(922a22e). It was detected fine and it seems to work pretty good as well.
Preview works fine, but I noticed that after the actual scanning run, when the
scanhead is parked again, it tries to go back too far. It does
13 matches
Mail list logo
