Does adding a new scanner to the supported list require recompiling the backend?
vid/pid 03f0:262a can use the hpljm1005 backend. I have a few more recently
released products' vid/pid that can also use that backend.
I'm once again trying to convince management to allow me to support our
product
Yup. We have a TWAIN and a standalone driver for OSX.
IIRC, TWAIN has some problems with 10.5 but works with older OSX. (10.5 is on
my wishlist to investigate.)
-Original Message-
From: m. allan noah [mailto:kitno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sun 12/28/2008 6:35 PM
To: David Poole
Cc: Paul
> Are you managers aware that your protocol was already reverse engineered?
> http://www.sane-project.org/lists/sane-backends-cvs.html#S-HPLJM1005
Yup, I've pointed that out. Didn't help. I'm still working on the Powers That
Be but we have a lot of institutional inertia.
-- next
> Sounds like you would be the kind of manufacturer to publish protocol
> specs, do you plan to do that, or have you done so?
Me, personally, I'd love to be able to do that. I've talked with my managers
and no go. As a previous poster mentioned, our business types consider our own
protocol a "
> Bah. Any pointers on that? I haven't been able to find anything on the
> intartubes about such a class yet.
http://www.usb.org/developers/defined_class/#BaseClass06h
www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/usb_still_img10.pdf
When we were developing our scanners, we looked into the USB still imagi
> try the -density flag to convert.
-density 300 -units PixelsPerInch
is what I use when scanning to TIF or PNG. (Substitute '300' for appropriate
scan DPI.)
-Original Message-
From: sane-devel-bounces+dpoole=marvell@lists.alioth.debian.org on behalf
of m. allan noah
Sent: Fri 12/