[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE20 / Plustek on OpenBSD

2006-06-22 Thread Craig
this working. Hope the above helps and I have again included the sane debug output below. -- Best regards, Craig http://slashboot.org/ Support OpenBSD http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html # export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=19 ; scanimage -L [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of plustek to 19. [pl

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE20 / Plustek on OpenBSD

2006-06-19 Thread Craig
Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:40, Craig wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I've been trying without success for a while now, to get this USB >> scanner working on OpenBSD 3.9 and previously 3.8, using >> sane-backends-1.0.17 and previously 1.

[sane-devel] CanoScan LiDE20 / Plustek on OpenBSD

2006-06-19 Thread Craig
Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:40, Craig wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I've been trying without success for a while now, to get this USB >> scanner working on OpenBSD 3.9 and previously 3.8, using >> sane-backends-1.0.17 and previously 1.0.16 >>

[sane-devel] Please Help with Epson Stylus CX-5800

2006-05-08 Thread Craig Setera
Oliver, thanks for taking a look. For those kinds souls that would be willing to take a look, the USB snoop log is stashed up on my web site. You can grab it from here http://www.gizmo-a-gogo.org/sane/usbsnoop.zip Thanks, Craig Oliver Schwartz wrote: > Hi, > > I've taken a l

[sane-devel] Please Help with Epson Stylus CX-5800

2006-05-07 Thread Craig Setera
to help out on this one? I'm a programmer, although I have almost zero experience with Linux C programming or anything USB related. I see the iScan driver stuff, but I'd really prefer to use Sane if I can. Thanks, Craig Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On 2006-05-06

[sane-devel] Please Help with Epson Stylus CX-5800

2006-05-07 Thread Craig Setera
;m more than willing to collect more debugging information. This is an Ubuntu Dapper installation with kernel 2.6.15. Sane version 1.0.17 Thanks in advance for any help you can give me, Craig [epson] sane_init: sane-backends 1.0.17 [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of sanei_usb to 128. [sanei

[sane-devel] which of the two Microtek backends works with a ScanMaker 4 ?

2002-04-26 Thread Craig Dewick
en connected in place of the ScanMaker 3 I have. The new scanner is using the same SCSI ID (6). Regards, Craig. -- Craig Dewick. Send email to "cdew...@sunshack.org" Point your web client at "www.sunshack.org" or "www.sunshack.net" to access my arch

[sane-devel] Solaris 'sgen' driver problem was device permission related!

2002-04-15 Thread Craig Dewick
appears to be the case until the problem with the scanner itself is investigated thoroughly. 8-) Regards, Craig. -- Craig Dewick. Send email to "cdew...@sunshack.org" Point your web client at "www.sunshack.org" or "www.sunshack.net" to access my

[sane-devel] further to the Solaris 'sgen' driver issue with sane/microtek

2002-04-09 Thread Craig Dewick
Hello, Reading the Microtek backend web page at "http://www.mir.com/mtek"; I noticed a way to get debug info displayed. So I did this and re-ran xsane: 262 craig@lios #> setenv SANE_DEBUG_MICROTEK 128 263 craig@lios #> xsane microtek:/dev/scsi/scanner/c6t6d0 [sanei_debu

[sane-devel] Problems with Microtek Scanmaker-III, Solaris 8, sgen driver, xsane

2002-04-09 Thread Craig Dewick
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Karsten Festag wrote: > Hi Craig, > > The 'scsi * * scanner' line is for autodetecting every scanner on the > scsi subsystem. It is not neccessary if you specify the device file and > I don't know if the autodetection works on Solaris. > &g

[sane-devel] Problems with Microtek Scanmaker-III, Solaris 8, sgen driver, xsane

2002-04-09 Thread Craig Dewick
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Karsten Festag wrote: > Hi Craig, > > do you have an entry like > > /dev/scsi/scanner/c6t6d0 > > in the microtek.conf file? Yes. I modified microtek.conf and dll.conf in /usr/local/etc/sane.d. The first file looks like this: # Uncomment following

[sane-devel] Problems with Microtek Scanmaker-III, Solaris 8, sgen driver, xsane

2002-04-08 Thread Craig Dewick
ltra-30 has no USB hardware. 8-) Anyway, that's beside the point. 'sane-find-scanner' detects the presence of the scanner and correctly reports what it is, so what could be causing 'xsane' to be unable to access it? Regards, Craig. -- Craig Dewick. Send em

[sane-devel] Problem building sane-backends-1.0.7 under Solaris 8, gcc 2.95.2

2002-04-05 Thread Craig Dewick
le? Is the 'ifneq' statement actually valid in a makefile? What's wrong with it? I'm guessing the comma might be spurious, but I could be wrong. Regards, Craig. -- Craig Dewick. Send email to "cdew...@sunshack.org" Point your web client at "www.s

[sane-devel] Cant' download Xsane-Win32

2001-09-21 Thread John C. Craig
xsane.org <http://www.xsane.org> is either hopelessly overloaded or has other problems. Can someone fix this or tell me where I can get a copy? Thanks. John Craig