On 2/9/06, Jon Chambers wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Chris McKeever wrote:
> > Wondering if there would be anyone interested in helping me create an
> > RPM for the latest version of Sane?
>
> Perhaps someone has beaten you to it?
>
> http://r
Wondering if there would be anyone interested in helping me create an
RPM for the latest version of Sane? I would love to learn the art of
making RPM and seeing that I have just rolled Sane out to 12 machines,
this seems to be a good candidate.
Just need someone to bounce questions off if I hit a
n Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:01:59 +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> let's try and shed some light on the plustek-backend and the LiDE30
> scanner:
>
> - The scanner is a USB1.1 device, as the used chipset, a LM9833 is only
> capable to do USB1.1.
> - The LM9833 is able to scan @ 8bit per color-c
well - did some more testing - downgraded the RH 7.3 box to SANE
1.0.13 - same delay in in starting the scan (+2 min. @ 600 DPI).. I
think tried it on a slightly more powerful CPU and had the same
result. This is leaning me towards that the 2.6 kernel with its
implemenation of LIBUSB works a lot b
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:19:27 +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:07:46PM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> > The manufacturer says that it does 1200x2400 optically, but xsane only
> > offers a listbox that says a single value from 0 to 2400, no XXXxYYY
> > choices
, Chris McKeever wrote:
> I have been wrestling with this for a while now, and not turning up
> much through searching the web. I have installed SANE
> sane-backends-1.0.14 and have a CANON lide30 scanner.
> At low resolutions it will process fine. If I go to 300 is fails at
> about 7
I have been wrestling with this for a while now, and not turning up
much through searching the web. I have installed SANE
sane-backends-1.0.14 and have a CANON lide30 scanner.
At low resolutions it will process fine. If I go to 300 is fails at
about 75% and anyhting higher wont even start.
I ha
