Re: [sane-devel] Canon MG7120

2014-07-20 Thread Tammo Heeren
I managed to get to scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.25git; backend version 1.0.25 and xsane work. Thank you guys. My next challenge is getting simple-scan to updated, because it get some other error. But at least the scanner works now. Tammo On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Rolf Bensch wrote:

Re: [sane-devel] Canon MG7120

2014-07-20 Thread Rolf Bensch
Hi Tammo, your scanner is fully supported by recent development version 1.0.25 (http://www.sane-project.org/lists/sane-backends-cvs.html#S-PIXMA). Please install Sane from git as described in README.linux or here: http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux. Cheers, Rolf Am 20.07.2014 11:09, schr

Re: [sane-devel] Canon MG7120

2014-07-20 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Tammo Heeren wrote: > I managed to get here > scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.24; backend version 1.0.23 > > and sane-find-scanner now finds > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1772 [MG7100 series]) at > libusb:002:005 > > What do I do from here? s

Re: [sane-devel] Canon MG7120

2014-07-20 Thread Gernot Hassenpflug
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Tammo Heeren wrote: > scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.23; backend version 1.0.23 Hello Tammo, If you look at the supported scanners list, you will see the MG7100 is in the latest stable release. You'll need to get 1.0.24. It is untested, so some resolutions might no

Re: [sane-devel] Canon MG7120

2014-07-20 Thread Tammo Heeren
I managed to get here scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.24; backend version 1.0.23 and sane-find-scanner now finds found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1772 [MG7100 series]) at libusb:002:005 What do I do from here? On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Tammo Heeren wrote: > scanimage

Re: [sane-devel] Canon MG7120

2014-07-20 Thread Tammo Heeren
scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.23; backend version 1.0.23 On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote: > What version sane are you using. The later the version, the higher the > probability that what you need is there, particularly if you have a newer > scanner. > > Bob G > > > On 07/