2010/3/25 Alejandro Imass :
> i Have done _some_
> tweaking here and there with sane, may be able to help in something
> along the way
>
Having few experiences is more than me! ^^
It's a really good news!
--
St?phane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
scar @ 03/25/2010 11:39 PM:
> 'sudo scanimage > test.pnm' and indeed the test.pnm looks
> just fine.
# export SANE_DEBUG=255
# export SANE_DEBUG_SANEI=255
# export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255
# export SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_USB2=255
# scanimage > test.pnm 2>scani
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
scar @ 03/23/2010 12:34 PM:
> surely there is something we can learn from the linux packages mustek
> provides[1]?
actually, i am surprised to find that these drivers actually work,
contrary to what i previously read! guess we should give mustek mo
My mistake, it is fine, the cleaned output looked so different. Thanks!
Gernot
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Gernot Hassenpflug
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:47 PM, forum at coolpixx.de
> wrote
>> Ok now I hope it's right
>
> Perfect! I hope Nicolas Martin will give his opinion also, since he is
> working on the pixma backend and I do not have experience with the
Our info indicates that this (and many other) Visioneer machines are
RTS8801 chipset. Sane has an RTS8891 backend, it might be possible to
modify that to work with the older chipset. Not sure if it is worth
the time, reverse engineering can be fun, but also very frustrating.
allan
On Thu, Mar 25,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:47 PM, forum at coolpixx.de
wrote
> Ok now I hope it's right
Perfect! I hope Nicolas Martin will give his opinion also, since he is
working on the pixma backend and I do not have experience with the
ImageCLASS devices but will take a look.
Regards,
Gernot
Unfortunately, the pixma backend you're using, probably coming with your
Linux distribution, is too old (0.15.0), MF3110 was declared but under
an incorrect Pixma class of protocol, so trying here to use a wrong
Pixma protocol (as seen in the d420 message, wrong length).
This has been fixed since
Try getting a usb sniffer log of a low resolution small scan, using this tool:
http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/UsbSnoop/
Then we can see if it looks anything like the epjitsu machines.
allan
2010/3/25 St?phane Blondon :
> 2010/3/24 m. allan noah :
>> At that point, I would investigate the epjit
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:53 PM, wrote:
> Here is a log:
/../
> [pixma] pixma_scan(): start
> [pixma] ? line_size=1920 image_size=1683840 channels=3 depth=8
> [pixma] [pixma] Reader task id=1026 (threaded)
> scanimage: scanning image of size 640x877 pixels at 24 bits/pixel
> scanimage: acquiring
(I will try to merge "CanoScan 5000F support?" with the 4200F/5600F-part of
"any sniff volunteers unsupported Canon scanners: 4200F, 5200F, 9900F,
9950F" and
"To owners of CanoScan 5600F: please volunteer for testing" here.)
CanoScan 4200F, 5000F, 5600F seem to use similar protocols:
Gernot Has
Dear SANE people,
in an (admittedly rather old - 2003) post on this forum I have seen that
somebody (Terry Boldt) was working on the Visioneer OneTouch 8920 USB
backend. Of course, Terry can no longer be reached at the E-mail address he
used back then. I have one of those scanners and would be
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:46 PM, scar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/25/2010 12:21 AM:
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, scar wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/24/2010 09:15 PM:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, scar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/24/2010 09:15 PM:
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar wrote:
> i tried to set the y_range to 16.0 and reinstalled, but still the light
> went all the way to the end o
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: UsbSnoop.zip
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 18384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100325/39e3166a/attachment-0001.obj>
Some links:
http://www.sane-project.org/lists/sane-backends-cvs.html#S-UNSUPPORTED
which shows (among others)
http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/canon-4200f.html
http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/canon-5000f.html
http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/canon-5200f.html
etc...
There r
>
> regardless, there is still no usable image.? so where
> are we at getting
> this scanner to work?? who can i pay to catalyze
> development? ;)
>
try changing line 146 of mustek_usb2.c from
> SANE_FALSE to SANE_TRUE (is this a CIS scanner?)
gt; Regards, Gernot
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: USBLog2 Canon MF3110.usblog
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 60302 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100325/d3232671/attachment-0001.obj>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Ille @ 03/24/2010 12:39 AM:
>> Le Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:11:18 -0700,
>> scar a ?crit :
>>
>>> i re-plugged the USB cable and tried /usr/local/bin/sane-find-scanner
>>> and it detects the scanner lik
g/pipermail/sane-devel/2009-August/025221.html
>
> Here you can see that the printer is declared in the backend to get it
> to be recognized, but it is not tested to work properly (at that
> time):
> http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-pixma.5.html
>
>
> So perhaps the printer expects something else to be done in addition
> to what the current protocol implements for it. In that case a Windows
> UsbSnoop log of hte same scan type would be necessary. Can you get
> one? (see above thread).
>
> Regards,
> Gernot
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logs.zip
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10403 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100325/3cf1b760/attachment.obj>
I think the first scann don?t work right with usbsniffer
now I have a log it has 50 mb where can I upload it?
It?s to big for a e-mail
Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:53 PM, wrote:
>
>> Here is a log:
>>
> /../
>
>> [pixma] pixma_scan(): start
>> [pixma] li
009-August/025221.html
>
> Here you can see that the printer is declared in the backend to get it
> to be recognized, but it is not tested to work properly (at that
> time):
> http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-pixma.5.html
>
>
> So perhaps the printer expects something else to be done in addition
> to what the current protocol implements for it. In that case a Windows
> UsbSnoop log of hte same scan type would be necessary. Can you get
> one? (see above thread).
>
> Regards,
> Gernot
>
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: USBLog1 Canon MF3110.usblog
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 12810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100325/00a68e9e/attachment-0001.obj>
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:29:13 +0900
> Alesh Slovak wrote:
>
>> There is one hitch I can think of with this. We use a non-free component to
>> support the network protocol as well. Most, if not all of these scanners are
>> fully supported by epson2, including network scanning, as far as I know.
Le Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:01:47 +0300,
Aleksey a ?crit :
> Hello.
>
> I have a Mustek BearPaw 4800TA Pro sanner. I need backend for this
> scanner. Is anyone works on this backend now?
> Can anyone make this driver?
> Thanks for any help.
> I want to help make backend, but I'm not programmer. I can
Here is a log:
export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=255
/var/mod/root # scanimage -v
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 255.
[pixma] pixma version 0.15.0
[pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS MF3110 at
libusb:001:009
[pixma] sanei_bjnp_find_devices:
[pixma] Added all configured sc
Hallo, I have a Canon MF3110.
It finds the scanner. And I can start scanning.
the massage:
/var/mod/root # scanimage
P6
# SANE data follows
640 877
255
but then there is not happens more.
This is all.
What can I do.
If I scan remote it scanns also but there comes no image.
I hope you can hel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/25/2010 12:21 AM:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, scar wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Gernot Hassenpflug @ 03/24/2010 09:15 PM:
>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:06 PM, scar wrote:
>
>> i
use this tool instead:
http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/UsbSnoop/
allan
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:34 AM, forum at coolpixx.de
wrote:
> Hallo I have create the log this this tool: SnoopyPro-0.22
> I do only write USBlog ;-) because is a log of USB
>
>
>
> Gernot Hassenpflug schrieb:
>>
>> Sorry,
Dan Blacker wrote:
> My prefered workflow is to use Vuescan, as opposed to xsane, or scanimage.
>
> When scanning the full width of the TPU with vuescan at 6400dpi, there
> are no error messages, but vuescan automatically scans the image at
> 3200dpi instead.
I'm afraid I don't know anything abo
Hello, all!
So, any chance anyone is working on this? If nobody is working on
this, I'd like to start but I'll definitely need a crash course in
scanner driver programming and to what I should pay attention. Or
maybe somebody is aware of a similar driver that I can adjust?
Thanks,
Catalin
On Fr
2010/3/24 m. allan noah :
> Depending on how your system is configured, the existing
> /usr/bin/scanimage might have a preference for /usr/lib, while
> /usr/local/bin/scanimage will prefer /usr/local/lib. So, you might
> just need to call the right binary...
>
It works exactly like you said! :-) T
31 matches
Mail list logo
