[sane-devel] HP Scanjet G2710 support in RPM-packed sane-backends

Am Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:17:08 schrieben Sie: > what arguments did you give to configure when you built sane? > > allan > I didn't compile it myself, I used the following RPMs: jacek at veteran:~> rpm -qa | grep sane sane-backends-32bit-1.0.19-99.1 sane-backends-autoconfig-1.0.19-99.1 sane-f

[sane-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New release of Image Scan! for Linux

Julien BLACHE writes: > Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > > Hi, > >> You must have looked a very long time ago ;-P > > iscan 1.13.1 it seems :) Which allowed you to redistribute everything in non-free/. -- Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2 FLOSS Engineer -- AVASYS Corporation FSF Associate Member #1962

[sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations.

* "m. allan noah" : >> Thank you for your swift answer. I forgot to mention that I need a >> combined document feeder/flatbed-scanner, though, so that particular >> model won't work, regrettably. Can I ask how many seconds it takes, >> approximately, to scan a color page? (Manufacturers have an

[sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations.

* "m. allan noah" : > I am very, very happy with the Fujitsu fi-6130. Fast, quiet, small, > reversed roller system prevents jams, very well supported in SANE CVS > version. Not cheap, but less than your HP :) If your needs are a > little less, you might be able to find the previous model (fi-5120C)

[sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations.

I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations for SANE-supported scanners with a document-feeder and decent scanning-speed that doesn't jam a lot, etc. It needs to be able to scan A4 documents in a few seconds per page (300 DPI color is fine). Our current scanner takes 20-30 seconds per color

[sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Johannes Groedem wrote: > * "m. allan noah" : >>> Thank you for your swift answer. I forgot to mention that I need a >>> combined document feeder/flatbed-scanner, though, so that particular >>> model won't work, regrettably. Can I ask how many seconds it takes,

[sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Johannes Groedem wrote: > * "m. allan noah" : >> I am very, very happy with the Fujitsu fi-6130. Fast, quiet, small, >> reversed roller system prevents jams, very well supported in SANE CVS >> version. Not cheap, but less than your HP :) If your needs are a >> lit

[sane-devel] Document scanner, hardware recommendations.

I am very, very happy with the Fujitsu fi-6130. Fast, quiet, small, reversed roller system prevents jams, very well supported in SANE CVS version. Not cheap, but less than your HP :) If your needs are a little less, you might be able to find the previous model (fi-5120C) around on clearance or refu

[sane-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New release of Image Scan! for Linux

Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: >>> You must have looked a very long time ago ;-P >> >> iscan 1.13.1 it seems :) > > Which allowed you to redistribute everything in non-free/. Not going to argue further :) If it had been redistributable at the time, I would have packaged the damn thing. ISTR there was a

[sane-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New release of Image Scan! for Linux

Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: Hi, > You must have looked a very long time ago ;-P iscan 1.13.1 it seems :) JB. -- Julien BLACHE GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169

[sane-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New release of Image Scan! for Linux

Hello, On Feb 13 17:45 Julien BLACHE wrote (shortened): > Volker Grabsch wrote: > >>> Redistribution of the binary plugins is forbidden by the license. >> >> In that case, it's even more important to provide clean, stable >> URLs such that the plugins can be downloaded automatically by >> script

[sane-devel] [ANNOUNCE] New release of Image Scan! for Linux

Julien BLACHE writes: > Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > > Hi, > >>> Redistribution of the binary plugins is forbidden by the license. >> >> TTBOMK, that is not true. The license for the plugins is attached, >> feel free to point out where it says redistribution is forbidden. > > Oh good, they changed