On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:08:10 -0500, m. allan noah wrote:
> right- my fault. lost that function somewhere along the line- fix
> coming up momentarily.
Thanks, now all compiles again.
Franz
Hi,
I just tried to compile the latest CVS from today (on OS/2) and got
epjitsu.o: Undefined symbol _free_scanner referenced from text segment
Looks like the funciton code is missing.
Franz
Le Wednesday 19 December 2007 13:42:25 cgi-mailer at kundenserver.de, vous avez
?crit?:
> ===
> == Neuer Eintrag
> ===
>
>
> ---
> -- Formular: 'adddev'
> ---
was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20071219/da894629/attachment.pgp
Oliver Rauch wrote:
Hi,
> What is discussed in the moment is a "slow transformation from SANE1 to
> SANE2" (I don't remeber the exact words). And we do not discuss only
> some new frame types. It took about 30 minutes after this suggestion to
> add several other things that are not compatible to
Hello,
Can anyone shed some light on SANE support for the Canon PIXMA MP140
scanner/printer. I see the MP130 and MP150 are documented in the
supported devices list but not the MP140.
Thanks
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:30:12 +0100
Oliver Rauch wrote:
> What is discussed in the moment is a "slow transformation from SANE1 to
> SANE2" (I don't remeber the exact words). And we do not discuss only
> some new frame types. It took about 30 minutes after this suggestion to
> add several other th
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 19:27 +0100 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
>
> Would you care to explain why the addition of new frame types
> would create any such problems ? Because that's the only thing that
> has been discussed so far - no ABI changes, no new functions in the
> API, just new frame type
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'supp at students.zcu.cz'
2. Manufacturer (e.g.
Oliver Rauch wrote:
Hi,
> into xsane. I know if I would continue the work for xsane in this case
> then I would have to spend 99% of my programming time to answer
> questions about incompatibilities and problems with the new
> "1.1-standard".
Would you care to explain why the addition of new fr
This sounds interesting to me for the problem:
Error during device I/O running saned on WL-500GP under OpenWRT using libusb
I would have tested it with kernel 2.6, but I have no access to the device
for the next three weeks, so I could report the results of the test on 2.6
and some tests (under 2.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:48:54 +0100
Oliver Rauch wrote:
> I don`t understand why nobody wants to start with SANE2. It will take a
> weekend of work to create a SANE2 backend from an existing SANE1
> backend. Because you don`t want to spend this time you destroy the SANE1
> standard by creating a c
Hello.
As most of you know I am against the recent development of the SANE1
standard. We have an almost complete SANE2 standard and a good working
SANE1 standard. What is happening in the moment is the destruction of
all we have. This will end in a chaos.
I don`t understand why nobody wants to st
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:42:39 -0500
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> >
> > seems fine. but you want to branch the cvs or wait until feb before
> > starting to work on 1.1 ?
>
> i think we should wait. we can add a dir in the 'experimental' cvs
> tree for working on the standard and any backends that ha
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:34:56 -0500
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> >
> > exactly. who can take care to setup the cvs for the 1.1 branch?
> >
>
> how does this sound:
>
> sane 1.0.19- release in Feb, last of the standard 1.0 versions, remove
> SANE_FRAME_JPEG.
>
> sane 1.1.0- release in May?, first o
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:36:09 -0500
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> > > if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be
> > > done to
> > > handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that we
> > > move incrementally toward SANE2.
> >
> > I don't think so,
right- my fault. lost that function somewhere along the line- fix
coming up momentarily.
allan
On Dec 19, 2007 4:40 PM, Franz Bakan wrote:
> Hi,
> I just tried to compile the latest CVS from today (on OS/2) and got
>
> epjitsu.o: Undefined symbol _free_scanner referenced from text segment
>
> Lo
Hi everybody,
after a nightmare of searching the web for the right scanner and asking in IRC
my last hope is this mailing list.
What I'm looking for: A4 flatbed scanner with transparency scanning for films
and negatives (4800 dpi optical) for amateurs with USB 2.0
What have i done: I checked t
On Dec 19, 2007 3:18 PM, ?tienne Bersac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > What we really need, err, what USERS really need, is a range of
> > frontends that match their needs as closely as possible:
> > - one frontend for the average joe user to handle basic scanning
> >needs (b/w text, documents, photos)
>
On Dec 19, 2007 2:30 PM, Oliver Rauch wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 19:27 +0100 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
>
> >
> > Would you care to explain why the addition of new frame types
> > would create any such problems ? Because that's the only thing that
> > has been discussed so far - no ABI ch
m. allan noah wrote:
> agreed- it seems that we have had so much trouble getting started on
> sane2 because it is so large and may have incompatibilites with sane1,
> making it hard to test. my idea was to move forward in smaller steps,
> trying to keep compatibility, so that old backends require n
===
== Neuer Eintrag
===
---
-- Formular: 'adddev'
---
1. Your email address:
'hoffmann_jens at web.de'
2. Manufacturer (e.g.
On Dec 19, 2007 12:48 PM, Oliver Rauch wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As most of you know I am against the recent development of the SANE1
> standard. We have an almost complete SANE2 standard and a good working
> SANE1 standard. What is happening in the moment is the destruction of
> all we have. This will
I've noticed that sanei_usb_read_bulk() returns SANE_STATUS_IO_ERROR
for all negative return values from the usb stack. One of those errors
which i have just started seeing under linux 2.4 on a slow ARM box is
EAGAIN, which probably should be converted into
SANE_STATUS_DEVICE_BUSY?
allan
--
"The
On Dec 19, 2007 9:41 AM, Colin Hogben wrote:
> m. allan noah wrote:
> > agreed- it seems that we have had so much trouble getting started on
> > sane2 because it is so large and may have incompatibilites with sane1,
> > making it hard to test. my idea was to move forward in smaller steps,
> > tryi
> > how does this sound:
> >
> > sane 1.0.19- release in Feb, last of the standard 1.0 versions, remove
> > SANE_FRAME_JPEG.
> >
> > sane 1.1.0- release in May?, first of the standard 1.1 versions, no
> > new function calls, only more well-known options and frame types, old
> > backends need no cha
On Dec 19, 2007 11:11 AM, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:36:09 -0500
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
>
> > > > if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be
> > > > done to
> > > > handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that
> > >
no problem. come back to the list if you have questions or get stuck-
but be prepared to spend hundreds of hours on the project if the
machine uses an undocumented command set.
allan
On Dec 19, 2007 11:01 AM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> Ok, thanks guys. I will take a look and see if this is someth
Those who are on the sane-commit list have already seen this, but for
everyone else-
I've add a new backend to sane cvs called epjitsu. It supports
Epson-based Fujitsu-branded scanners (hence the name). Currently this
includes the fi-60F A6 flatbed, and the ScanSnap S300 legal ADF
scanners.
These
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:57:27 +0100
stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be done
> to
> handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that we
> move incrementally toward SANE2.
I don't think so, because that
On 12/19/07, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:57:27 +0100
> stef wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > if a branch is created, to support new data formats, could it be done
> > to
> > handle them the way (or a subset of) SANE2 is planned to do it? So that we
> > move incrementa
Le Tuesday 18 December 2007 21:01:50 Gerhard Jaeger, vous avez ?crit?:
> Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 15:03:59 schrieb Alessandro Zummo:
> > I would like, in the interest of the SANE community of users and
> > developers, to kindly ask the permission to add some much required frame
> > types to
Le Monday 17 December 2007 22:28:19 gottox at s01.de, vous avez ?crit?:
> Hi!
>
> I got a problem with a Lexmark X1180. The scanner starts making weird
> noises when I scan.
>
> There's a similiar Bug report:
> http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?group_id=30186&atid=410366&func=detail&ai
>d=303960
m. allan noah wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 12:37 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 08:40 -0500, m. allan noah wrote:
>>> On 12/18/07, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il giorno mar, 18/12/2007 alle 12.00 +, Jonathan Buzzard ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 12:13 +0100, Giusepp
34 matches
Mail list logo
