This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_000B_01C5446D.759FD420
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_001_000C_01C5446D.759FD420"
--=_NextPart_001_000C_01C5446D.759FD420
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Tran
Hi Stef,
Thank you for answering my question. I cannot imagine that endpoint 0x82
isn't a bulk write endpoint on GL841. There is a successful bulk write
in my trace using endpoint 0x82. It is after genesys_create_slope_table:
[genesys] genesys_bulk_write_register (size = 162)
[sanei_usb] sanei_us
No idea?
Le samedi 09 avril 2005 =C3=A0 01:54 +0200, NM Lists a =C3=A9crit :
> Hi all,
>=20
> When I scan through sane+xsane, the images on my Canon Lide20 show a
> calibration problem; the left side of the image is much clearer than th=
e
> right side. However, with the Canon drivers on Windows,
I've upgraded to FC 3. Xsane reports no scanner found, but if I unplug
and plug the USB cable, it works. I know, its problaly not a SANE
problem, but does anybody know a fix ??
I've already tried the FC 2 trick with
chmod 0666 "$DEVICE
at the end of "/etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner", but it dos
i only know fujitsu models, so i am sure there are others, but the
fi-4120C2 is pretty fast, and the sane support is ok for binary and
grayscale. scsi support is better than usb, but both work. it would be
better if it had a flat adf instead of the vertical one, it does jam
occasionally. the us
Thomas Frayne writes:
> I am running FC3 with kernel 2.6.10-1.241_FC3 and sane-backends
> 1.0.15-1.4. I downloaded iscan-1.14.0-3.i386.rpm from
> http://www.avasys.jp/english/linux_e/dl_scan.html, and installed it with
> the rpm command.
>
> I had no trouble doing scans with the Epson Perfecti
I have been using the Fujitsu M3091DC for about 2.5
years. I would like to upgrade to a scanner higher
quality faster document scanner, preferrably one that
can handle odd sized pages ( smaller than 8.5" by 11"
) and would not require that I darken a document by
fotocopying it first. Above all th