On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:32:54PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
> Hello people.
>
> This is not strictly a scanner problem, but I believe scanner hardware is
> relatively similar to the webcams - at least the bus interface.
>
> I'm playing with a parallel port webcam (weeCam), and hope to get it
>
All I can say for sure is that is is (and will not be) supported by the
EPSON backend. The scanner may be supported by the snapscan
backend, but I don't think anybody has tried this yet. There was a
thread
on this mailing list a few days ago titled "Epson Perfection 1670 photo
USB",
check the arc
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:28:22AM +0200, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Any other comments? I mean we can also decide to skip this pthread stuff
> completely!
I think it's good to have it, at least for MacOS X. The ideal way
would be to have not #ifdefs in the backends for threads/forks at all.
We
Hello people.
This is not strictly a scanner problem, but I believe scanner hardware is
relatively similar to the webcams - at least the bus interface.
I'm playing with a parallel port webcam (weeCam), and hope to get it
working for an experiment with a microprocessor (at the university).
Once i
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:38:56PM +, gerard klaver wrote:
> Forward from comp.periphs.scanners for Epson 1670 owners/dev. who don't
> follow this newsgroup.
> -
>
> Subject: VueScan and Epson 1670
> From: "Ed
On Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2003 23:54, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Jaeger, Gerhard wrote:
> > I've currently added pthread support to the sanei_thread lib and chan=
ged
> > the Plustek backend, so that it will use threading instead of forking=
on
>
Hi,
First of all, thanks to Karl Heinz and Henning for the quick replys,
and I'm sorry for the confusion: uk is the SCSI user-level (pass-thru,
generic) driver on NetBSD, I should have said this.
Henning Meier-Geinitz writes:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 07:15:26PM +0200, Michael Piotrowski wrote:
