[sane-devel] What am I missing?

2003-03-07 Thread David Wilson
Hello, I hate to admit defeat, but I have not been able to get my USB HP 6200C scanner to show up when I try the sane-find-scanner program. cat /proc/bus/usb/devices shows nothing. I am running A PCCHIPS 830 motherboard (SIS 735 chipset I believe) Redhat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.21-pre5 with usb-ohci (tried

[sane-devel] Problems with clients and "missing" Epson 1650

2003-03-07 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 07:12:32AM -0800, Michael Carland wrote: > I don't know what I did to cause the different conf > file to be used. I must have messed with my path or > something and been getting a different xsane binary. I don't think it's related to xsane. If you install sane-backends

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread abel deuring
Frank Zago wrote: > > abel deuring wrote: > > Frank Zago wrote: > > > >>>[fujitsu] set_window_param > >>>[fujitsu] Window set > >>>[fujitsu] 000: 00 00 01 2c 01 2c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > >>>[fujitsu] 016: 03 b0 00 00 05 89 00 00 00 02 08 00 00 00 00 00 > >>>[fujitsu] 032: 00 00 00 00 00 0

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Oliver Schirrmeister
Am Fre, 2003-03-07 um 17.12 schrieb Frank Zago: > abel deuring wrote: > > Frank Zago wrote: > > > >>>[fujitsu] set_window_param > >>>[fujitsu] Window set > >>>[fujitsu] 000: 00 00 01 2c 01 2c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > >>>[fujitsu] 016: 03 b0 00 00 05 89 00 00 00 02 08 00 00 00 00 00 > >>>[fu

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Oliver Schirrmeister
Am Fre, 2003-03-07 um 17.12 schrieb Frank Zago: > abel deuring wrote: > > Frank Zago wrote: > > > >>>[fujitsu] set_window_param > >>>[fujitsu] Window set > >>>[fujitsu] 000: 00 00 01 2c 01 2c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > >>>[fujitsu] 016: 03 b0 00 00 05 89 00 00 00 02 08 00 00 00 00 00 > >>>[fu

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Oliver Schirrmeister
Hi, the window parameter block looks ok. You are scanning with 300 dpi (ok), the width and height of your scanarea is 30x20mm (a small area but as far as I know it's allowed. You can try to set a larger area for example -y 297 -x 210). You are scanning grayscale. I have a M3097G with an old ROM-ve

FW: [sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Dirk Petersen
Thanks all for your great help up to now. Here is the next Debug Output, it seems to be the same. Oliver, how would I be able to check the firmware ? This scanner is basically a big piece of iron, I might have to take it apart. And would I be able to get another firmware for a scanner from 1994 fo

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Dirk Petersen
Abel, I would be happy to do some testing but unfortunately my coding skills do not go beyond python, C is rather like klingonian for me. In the latest sane backend sources (Top of the changelog below) I could not find the header file sg.h . I would need something like in file www/xxx replace yyy

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Dirk Petersen
David, can you give me a hint or link where to find those patches and may be code lines to look for Thanks Dirk > -Original Message- > From: sane-devel-ad...@www.mostang.com > [mailto:sane-devel-ad...@www.mostang.com] On Behalf Of David Anders > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:20 PM

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Dirk Petersen
Abel, I would be happy to do some testing but unfortunately my coding skills do not go beyond python, C is rather like klingonian for me. In the latest sane backend sources (Top of the changelog below) I could not find the header file sg.h . I would need something like in file www/xxx replace yyy

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Dirk Petersen
Thanks all for your great help up to now. Here is the next Debug Output, it seems to be the same. Oliver, how would I be able to check the firmware ? This scanner is basically a big piece of iron, I might have to take it apart. And would I be able to get another firmware for a scanner from 1994 fo

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread abel deuring
Frank Zago wrote: > > > [fujitsu] set_window_param > > [fujitsu] Window set > > [fujitsu] 000: 00 00 01 2c 01 2c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > > [fujitsu] 016: 03 b0 00 00 05 89 00 00 00 02 08 00 00 00 00 00 > > [fujitsu] 032: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 > > [fujitsu] 048: 20

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread David Anders
Dirk, this is the same issue i had when working with the fi-4220 and fi-4120. aparently fujitsu changes some of the window bits on different models. some models don't like have 00 values in certain registers even if the register isn't used. have a look at roncemers fi-4120/4220 patches. thank

[sane-devel] does order of options for scanimage matter?

2003-03-07 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 12:25:05AM +0100, Franz Bakan wrote: > Hi, > > a user reported that > > SCANIMAGE.EXE -d hp --mode Color --resolution 150 > --brightness 20 --contrast 40 -l15 -t35 -x60 -y105 > tst.pnm > > scans the correct section, but > > scanimage.exe -d hp -l 15 -t 35 -x 60 -y

[sane-devel] Problems with clients and "missing" Epson 1650

2003-03-07 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:41:09PM -0800, Michael Carland wrote: > I been using my Epson 1650 for weeks without problems, > but am now unable to get it to work. I've rebooted > since I last had it working, but don't remember doing > anything special since the reboot before that to make > it wo

[sane-devel] does order of options for scanimage matter?

2003-03-07 Thread Major A
> > SCANIMAGE.EXE -d hp --mode Color --resolution 150 > > --brightness 20 --contrast 40 -l15 -t35 -x60 -y105 > tst.pnm > > > > scans the correct section, but > > > > scanimage.exe -d hp -l 15 -t 35 -x 60 -y 105 --mode > > Color --resolution 150 --contrast 40 --brightness 20 > tst1.pnm > > > > d

[sane-devel] lost with FUJITSU scanner M3096G

2003-03-07 Thread Frank Zago
abel deuring wrote: > Frank Zago wrote: > >>>[fujitsu] set_window_param >>>[fujitsu] Window set >>>[fujitsu] 000: 00 00 01 2c 01 2c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >>>[fujitsu] 016: 03 b0 00 00 05 89 00 00 00 02 08 00 00 00 00 00 >>>[fujitsu] 032: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 >>>[

[sane-devel] Problems with clients and "missing" Epson 1650

2003-03-07 Thread Michael Carland
--- Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:41:09PM -0800, Michael > Carland wrote: > > I been using my Epson 1650 for weeks without > problems, > > but am now unable to get it to work. I've rebooted > > since I last had it working, but don't remember > doing > > anythin

[sane-devel] does order of options for scanimage matter?

2003-03-07 Thread
Hi, a user reported that SCANIMAGE.EXE -d hp --mode Color --resolution 150 --brightness 20 --contrast 40 -l15 -t35 -x60 -y105 > tst.pnm scans the correct section, but scanimage.exe -d hp -l 15 -t 35 -x 60 -y 105 --mode Color --resolution 150 --contrast 40 --brightness 20 > tst1.pnm does not.