On 31 Jan 2003, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> I got an HP 2200C and it works fine with 1.0.9 but when i tried
> ,1.0.10pre2 but it works bad... it doesnt "boot" my scanner anyway .
> I dont know why but , i just wanted to say ...Thanks for all ...
I just went from 1.0.8 to 1.0.10pre3 , and my
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >
> > has trouble controlling lamp though. some previews come out solid black
> > because xsane doesn't turn the lamp on, and often leaves the bulb on after
> > xsane is closed.
>
> Did I already asked for the SANE-version you're using? Th
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 10:51, scott fagg wrote:
> [SNIPSNAP]
> > plustek + hp2200c works ok for random resolutions for me. Is it a function
> > of how much is scanned or how much data needs to be transfered ?
>
> Yes - in general all
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 10:51, scott fagg wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003 12:53, David Faure wrote:
> > > > * the only bug I'm seeing is that if I scan in a random resolution, say
> > > > 400
>
When I'm trying scanimage I have the folowing error message:
$ scanimage --device avision:/dev/scanner >toto.pnm
scanimage: sane_start: Out of memory
My config:
-> HP Scanjet 5370C USB
-> Linux RedHat kernel 2.4.7
-> 256 Mo RAM
-> sane-1.0.10-pre3
(same problem with sane-1.0.9)
I saw in the ar
Could the delay be due to the Slammer worm ?
If the mailing server has a Microsoft SQL/Server it could be the case.
I think of it because it began by the same date.
Le Vendredi 31 Janvier 2003 09:21, Gerhard Jaeger a =E9crit :
> Hi,
>
> > On Thursday 23 January 2003 11:22, Henning Meier-Geinitz w
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:21:45 +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Thursday 23 January 2003 11:22, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is everyone noticing a delay in sane-devel email arriving or is
> > > it just me? Mails send to the list arrive at mostang.com pretty
> > >
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:21:45AM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
[slow sane-devel]
> in the meantime yes! Any explanations?
No. I've asked David Mosberger-Tang about the delays but haven't
gotten an answer.
Bye,
Henning
Gerhard Jaeger wrote:
> some historical stuff ;-)
> I started the Plustek backend two years ago after receiving a parallelport
> scanner (OpticPro 9636T). As SANE is rather plattform independent,
> I only checked in the backend ocde , and not the kernel-mode driver
> ( as this one is only for vario
I got an HP 2200C and it works fine with 1.0.9 but when i tried
,1.0.10pre2 but it works bad... it doesnt "boot" my scanner anyway .
I dont know why but , i just wanted to say ...Thanks for all ...
Hi,
> On Thursday 23 January 2003 11:22, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is everyone noticing a delay in sane-devel email arriving or is it
> >just me? Mails send to the list arrive at mostang.com pretty quick
> >(seconds to minutes) and show up in the archive. But they take up
> > to 1
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 10:51, scott fagg wrote:
[SNIPSNAP]
> plustek + hp2200c works ok for random resolutions for me. Is it a funct=
ion
> of how much is scanned or how much data needs to be transfered ?=20
Yes - in general all scanners support various fixed resolutions, which
can be
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 22:17, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> David Faure wrote:
> > The most annoying thing for end users is that the /dev devices don't
> > exist (on a Mandrake 9.0), I had to mknod for /dev/pt_drv and
> > /dev/usbscanner... But really: great job. I was not expecting the usb
13 matches
Mail list logo
