On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > Hi, > > On Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 10:51, scott fagg wrote: > [SNIPSNAP] > > plustek + hp2200c works ok for random resolutions for me. Is it a function > > of how much is scanned or how much data needs to be transfered ? > > Yes - in general all scanners support various fixed resolutions, which > can be set by settings some sorts of dividers, i.e. a 600dpi scanner in > general supports 100dpi (/6), 150dpi (/4), 300dpi (/2)... > The Plustek backend uses the next higher resolution to scan and then > scales down the picture to the user set resolution, i.e. 125dpi... > That's all. > > There were some bugs in the scaling for the CIS based devices (LiDE30 etc.) > which should have been fixed so far. > > > > > has trouble controlling lamp though. some previews come out solid black > > because xsane doesn't turn the lamp on, and often leaves the bulb on after > > xsane is closed. > > Did I already asked for the SANE-version you're using? There have been > some trouble in the lamp setting code, but that should be history...
No, i don't recall that. I'm using : sane-frontends-1.0.8-4 xsane-0.84-8 sane-backends-devel-1.0.8-5 sane-backends-1.0.8-5 .. as shipped with redhat8.0 + up2date. > > Gerhard > _______________________________________________ > Sane-devel mailing list > sane-de...@www.mostang.com > http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > -- -- sco...@bigpond.net.au
