>Did you install Sane 1.0.9 manually (and in addition to the Sane
>installation that came with RH 8.0)? If so, the correct config files
>are in /usr/local/etc/sane.d. But: You should not have more than one
>Sane installation on your system, so please remove the old installation
>by runnning "rpm -e
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 05 January 2003 15:13, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 02:48:18PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Trying out the bt848 option, it captured a blank, 18% grey
> >> screen. (theres no ante
Hi,
Henning Meier-Geinitz schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:11:47AM +0100, Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
>
>>HP is just for the manufacturer. Because on the listing nearly noone
>>else uses the manufacturer name in the models list, I would agree to
>>name all just "ScanJet ...".
>
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 02:48:18PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Trying out the bt848 option, it captured a blank, 18% grey screen.
> (theres no antenna feed to the card at the moment so it should have
> been snow, but what do I know, I'm just a broadcast tv engineer).
Usually it's necessary
Hi,
This is the current TODO list for SANE 1.0.10. If anything is
wrong/already fixed/missing, please change in CVS or contact me.
I don't think there is anything really realese-critical, but some
minor issues should be fixed.
Bye,
Henning
TODO (2003-01-05)
todo
backends
Hi,
Backend freeze for SANE 1.0.10 is active now. So no new backends are
allowed to go into the distribution until 1.0.10 is released.
The timetable looks like this:
2003-01-11: Feature freeze
2003-01-25: Code freeze
2003-02-01: Release
Feature freeze means that only bug fixes and documentation
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:33:46PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:05:00PM +0100, Pierre SOUCHAY wrote:
> > I use sane 1.0.7 for a while with a canscan 300.
> [...]
> > ~$ scanimage -d canon:/dev/sg0 2> scanimage.log
> > Segmentation fault
>
> I'm not sure if
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 01:54:41AM +0100, Andrea Suatoni wrote:
> I have packaged the SANE 1.0.9 backends / frontends for IRIX, using the SGI
> MIPSpro C compiler. The packages should upgrade the 1.0.8 versions currently
> available on http://freeware.sgi.com/
Thanks.
> In order to compile p
Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, A E Lawrence wrote:
>
>
>> > I made this change and ran
>>
>> > $ make modules
>> > # make modules_install
>>
>> > and rebooted. Didn't seem to make any difference for my situation. The
>> > timeout messages still happen -- and about the same rate.
On Sunday 05 January 2003 18:00, Per Aalrust wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Henning you were right! I had the Kowa software installed for test
>and the sane backend was replaced.
>
>> The epson backend maintainer may understand that better, but my
>> impression is that xscanimage sets the resolution to 301 but it
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:11:47AM +0100, Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
> HP is just for the manufacturer. Because on the listing nearly noone
> else uses the manufacturer name in the models list, I would agree to
> name all just "ScanJet ...".
Ok. So you will change hp.desc in CVS?
> There ar
hi,
i did't load the sane frontend.
i unloaded and loaded the module, but it is
still the same response. i wasn't using the
xterm, but nothing changes if i use it or not.
my kernel version is 2.4.18-19.7.x
and sane-backends 1.0.9
the sane-find-scanner output is:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x0
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:05:00PM +0100, Pierre SOUCHAY wrote:
> I use sane 1.0.7 for a while with a canscan 300.
[...]
> ~$ scanimage -d canon:/dev/sg0 2> scanimage.log
> Segmentation fault
I'm not sure if it's the same problem, but there is the following
entry in the ChangeLog:
2002-11-13
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:39:16PM +0200, Görkem Güngör wrote:
> i did't load the sane frontend.
Something is using the scanner when scanimage is trying to open it.
Either it's the backend itsself (this would be a bug in the plustek
backend, but that should be more widely known).
Or some ot
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:22:00PM +0100, Per Aalrust wrote:
> I've produced output with SANE_DEBUG_EPSON=255 It's just
> the part after xscanimage has started and I have clicked the
> resolution slider once for the first error message, but xscanimage
> was still alive. After a second click i
--Boundary-00=_CG39UJWOU1X2LRFGFDR0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi,
I use sane 1.0.7 for a while with a canscan 300.
Unfortunatly, my old PC running this version of sane with saned died a few
days ago.
So I tried to make this scanner
Hi,
I've produced output with SANE_DEBUG_EPSON=255 It's just
the part after xscanimage has started and I have clicked the
resolution slider once for the first error message, but xscanimage
was still alive. After a second click in the slider it died with a
segmentation fault. See below:
[epson]
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:16:50PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
[ ... ]
> Are you sure you are using the epson backend from SANE 1.0.9 and not
> the Epson so
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 06:16:50PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:22:00PM +0100, Per Aalrust wrote:
> > I've produced o
On Sunday 05 January 2003 15:13, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 02:48:18PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Trying out the bt848 option, it captured a blank, 18% grey
>> screen. (theres no antenna feed to the card at the moment so it
>> should have been snow, but what do
Hi all;
The artifact is still there, but I have a more pressing problem,
I've forgotten the location of the focus variable, at 600 dpi, I'm
seriously out of registration.
Humm, might have found it, the comment says "sensor distance" & 16
is way too high for my scanner, so I'm rebuilding it at
On Sunday 05 January 2003 14:48, Gene Heskett wrote:
>Hi everybody;
>
>I just rebuilt the sane-backends-1.0.9 with the plustek-45-TEST5
>patches, something I hadn't done in several versions now.
>
>On deleting config.cache and config.status & re-running
> ./configure, configure made me aware that t
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, A E Lawrence wrote:
> Ok. That looks ok. There are some other timeouts in usb.c. It might be
> worth experimenting with those values. Just search on the strings `timeout'
> and `TIMEOUT'. But at a quick glance, there seems to be only one place that
> the "usb_control/bulk_ms
Hi everybody;
I just rebuilt the sane-backends-1.0.9 with the plustek-45-TEST5
patches, something I hadn't done in several versions now.
On deleting config.cache and config.status & re-running ./configure,
configure made me aware that there was sane stuff in /usr, but that
the instant install
Henning Meier-Geinitz, Sonntag, 5. Januar 2003 12:25:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:50:45PM -0800, Rob Tanner wrote:
...
> > Based on the ouput of "scanimage -L" I am indeed running hpoj. Is the
> > lineart issue a backend issue?
>
> Most probably, yes. At least I haven't heard of similar issues wi
Hi,
to my knowledge, the LiDE 30 is only a new name for the N1240U. The latter
has vid=0x04a9 and pid=0x220e and works quite well with the plustek backend
from www.gjaeger.de (0.45TEST4).
Johann
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:33:49PM +0300, aae wrote:
> > Would anybody tell how to operat
Is is possible to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 under
linux? I didn't see an article witch explains it's
possible to use it.
Who hnows how to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 with
SANE ?
David
___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:50:45PM -0800, Rob Tanner wrote:
> >I'm not sure if this was the case for sane-backends 1.0.7 but
> >nowerdays the HP multi-function devices are supported by the "hpoj"
> >backend which is not part of the SANE distribution. Have a look at
> >http://hpoj.sourceforge.n
Hi,
HP is just for the manufacturer. Because on the listing nearly noone
else uses the manufacturer name in the models list, I would agree to
name all just "ScanJet ...". There are also some scanner listed as HP
7450. They should also be checked if they have to be named ScanJet 7450.
--Peter
Hi,
abel deuring schrieb:
> Moritz Angermann wrote:
>
>> o.k. i changed the scsi kernel driver from aic7xxx to aic7xxx_old
>> and did 2 'trys' the first one sane.log.bz2 is with the still active
>> dumb-read option, the secound one withought.
>
in both cases it failed during receiving image dat
> I made this change and ran
> $ make modules
> # make modules_install
> and rebooted. Didn't seem to make any difference for my situation. The
> timeout messages still happen -- and about the same rate.
Sorry not to reply in the same thread: I had deleted everything before
realizing
I disabled it for christmas so I didnt see the info :/
> As mentioned earlier on sane-devel, anoncvs doesn't work currently. I
> supect that hungry.com currently uses the computer that was
> anoncvs.hungry.com as cvs.hungry.com. In fact, the names resolve to
> the
> same IP adresses currently. So C
It may work with the Plustek backend.
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:31:54PM +0100, tcp-isim tcp-isim wrote:
> Is is possible to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 under
> linux? I didn't see an article witch explains it's
> possible to use it.
> Who hnows how to use the EPSON PERFECTION 660 with
> SANE ?=2
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, A E Lawrence wrote:
> > I made this change and ran
>
> > $ make modules
> > # make modules_install
>
> > and rebooted. Didn't seem to make any difference for my situation. The
> > timeout messages still happen -- and about the same rate.
>
> Sorry not to reply in
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 08:56:30PM +0100, Michel Janssens wrote:
> * - sane-backends and kernel version?
>
> Sane BackEnds: 1.0.9
> Kernel version : 2.4.18
Ok.
> * - output of scanimage -L
>
> [root@gateway root]# scanimage -L
> device `test:0' is a Noname frontend-tester virtual device
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:07:58PM -0300, John Coppens wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 15:46:00 +0100
> Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> >
> > For me it really looks like the old race condition bug in saned.
> >
>
> Just went to the Foundation's offices to do a few tests, but things were
> ra
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:37:37AM +0100, Per Aalrust wrote:
> here is the output from gdb and the bt:
Thanks but at least I don't see what's going wrong. Looks like
xscanimage can't handle the resolution list given by the epson backend
for some reason.
> Hope it helps to find the reason for
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 08:40:22PM +0100, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> Trying to update my sane cvs repository actually fails.
> cvs update -APd 2>&1 |tee cvslog
> + cvs update -APd
> + tee cvslog
> cvs update: authorization failed: server anoncvs.hungry.com rejected
> access to /cvsroot for use
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:19:03PM -0800, Rob Tanner wrote:
> The scanner is in HP3300MFP printer/scanner. I'm afraid my
> understanding of all the pieces is limited. The driver is ptal-mlcd.
> Is that a generic name, or is that the info you're asking for? The
> sane backends version is
Hi,
here is the output from gdb and the bt:
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/xscanimage
Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkobject.c: line 1163 (gtk_object_ref): assertion
`object->ref_count > 0' failed.
Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkobject.c: line 1173 (gtk_object_unref): assertion
`object->ref_count > 0'
40 matches
Mail list logo
