[sane-devel] First version of the new test backend released

Henning Meier-Geinitz, Freitag, 29. März 2002 18:21: > Hi, > > the first version (1.0.1) of the test backend is finished and can be > downloaded at http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/test-backend/ . > > It's in a very early stage so don't expect too much. Scanning is > possible but not much more. Yo

[sane-devel] Scanning speed slower, or is it just me?

I finally had a chance to test this, and sure enough, using the usb-uhci driver rather than the "alternate"/"JE" uhci driver sped things up considerably. The scanner head now moves at what is, as far as I can tell, full speed. Thanks for the suggestion! Cheers, Jeremy On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 13:27

[sane-devel] Compiling the Plustek backend on OS/2

Hi Franz, AFAIR you had a problem with the Plustek backend on OS/2, can you please send me the workaround so I'm able to include that to our CVS here? Thanks Gerhard

[sane-devel] First version of the new test backend released

Hi, the first version (1.0.1) of the test backend is finished and can be downloaded at http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/test-backend/ . It's in a very early stage so don't expect too much. Scanning is possible but not much more. The idea is to supersede the pnm backend as a hardware-independent

[sane-devel] Strange behaviour Xsane as GIMP-plugin; device selection

Hi, I recently upgraded my Linux Distribution to RH 7.2. I installed GIMP 1.2.3 from a TAR-bal, downloaded a new SANE (1.0.7) and Xsane (0.79). Compiling went OK, all scanning works on both scanners (Nikon LS200 and UMAX 1200S). But I noticed something strange under Gimp's File->Acquire. In the

[sane-devel] HELP! "Error during read: Error during device I/O" - HP 6250C over USB

Hi, Can someone please help? I'm getting frequent instances of: "Error during read: Error during device I/O" on Xsane. My specs: CPU:AMD Athlon Thunderbird 750 Motherboard:Gigabyte GA-7IXE4 Chipset:AMD 750 RAM:640MB DISK: heaps OS: debia

[sane-devel] Umax Astra 200P Bug-Report OS/2

On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:09:01PM +0100, Franz Bakan wrote: > Hi, > > Today an OS/2 user sent me the following output from stderr: > ( for 1.0.7 scanimage -L in ecp-mode) > > ... > [umax_pp_low] WriteSlow(0x8,0x40) passed... (umax_pp_low.c:4513) > [umax_pp_low] WriteSlow(0x8,0x60) passed...