Hi,
CVS-Code of Sane does not compile on OS/2 because of:
plustek-usbhw.c:932: storage size of `interval' isn't known.
there is no typedef for itimerval here.
Bye,
Franz
Please remove me as a subscriber.
Thank You,
David Mays
maasm...@yahoo.com
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/
From: mh
> At the moment, it's tstbackend that needs some bug fixes/improvements :-)
Indeed.
When I wrote it, I read the docs and I had to check how various
backends were working. Some assert are obviously incorrect as some of you
noticed. So do not modify your backend if you think the error is
i
Hi,
> > [snapscan] add_device: Is vendor "LITE-ON" model "LTR-12101B" a supported
> > scanner?
> > [snapscan] add_device: "LITE-ON LTR-12101B" is not one of AGFA SnapScan
> > 300, 310, 600, 1212, 1236, e20, e25, e26, e40, e42, e50, e52 or e60
> > Acer 300, 310, 610, 610+, 620, 620+, 640, 1240, 330
Henning Meier-Geinitz, Samstag, 16. März 2002 14:09:
...
> Then tstbackend doesn't like that pnm doesn't return SANE_STATUS_INVAL
> when sane_control_option is called for an inactive option. I'm not
> sure if this is a violation of the standard. Should I change this in
> the pnm backend? The same i
Dear Henning,
Many thanks!
I had done everything you suggested already, including:
modprobe scanner vendor=0x04b8 product=0x0110
(which is suggested by various authors, guidance notes, etc), but I had not
done:
rmmod scanner
modprobe scanner vendor=0x04b8 product
Hello Henning
I had DNS-Problems, the saned couldn't resolve the name or so, but the
source of the problem was myself... the /etc/hosts and /etc/resolv.conf
was false :(
But now runs all..xsane, scanimage, I'm absolut happy :)
--
Gruss Michael
+--+
| register
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:05:17AM -0600, Frank Zago wrote:
> I've derived scanimage into a test for backend.
> Currently it does not much:
> - options check (get/set, consistent type/range, ...)
> - 2 scans per scan mode (read byte per byte, read random size)
While testing the pnm backen
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:57:33PM +0100, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> Grrr... i've solved the problem...
>
> sorry for the unneeded mails...
Can you please explain what the problem was and how you solved it?
This may help others.
Bye,
Henning
Hello
Grrr... i've solved the problem...
sorry for the unneeded mails...
--
Gruss Michael
+--+
| registered fli4l-user 0212 |
+--+
|There's no Linux 95 or 98 |
|because Linux is forever!!|
+
Hello
I've a big problem with saned. I want to scan over the network, so i've
configured all. Now if I connect to the "scanserver" with
# scanimage -d net:192.168.1.10:scanner
then the saned, started with
# saned -d128
will return the following:
[saned] main: starting debug mode (level 128)
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 07:46:23AM +, Michael Chapman wrote:
>
> returns
> [epson] sane_start: /dev/usbscanner open (USB) failed: No such device
/dev/usbscanner exists has correct permissions? Is the scanner found
by the kernel? -> try sane-find-scanner and cat /proc/bus/usb/devic
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 08:58:15AM +0100, mh wrote:
> IMHO, it's not sufficient to have a single testbackend, e.g. if you want to
> simulate the scan area options with different units (SANE_UNIT_MM,
> SANE_UNIT_PIXEL) you'll probably need two testbackends.
Maybe we can use compile-time opt
Frank Zago wrote:
> I've derived scanimage into a test for backend.
> Currently it does not much:
> - options check (get/set, consistent type/range, ...)
> - 2 scans per scan mode (read byte per byte, read random size)
>
> It is not (yet) a replacement for scanimage -T.
>
> Comments?
I found
Jason McCarty wrote:
> > 3)
> > The reason why I enforce the accept license dialog after each update or new
> > installation
> > of xsane is not the license itself, it is the part:
> >
> > This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
> > ==> WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; wi
"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" wrote:
>
> For Debian's specific case, I think it would be wise to consult debian-legal
> about this matter. Personally, I think on Debian it would be safe to remove
> the dialog, since the default Debian installation comes with an /etc/motd
> which states the following:
On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 05:20, Oliver Rauch wrote:
>> I think the dialog should probably not show the whole GPL (because
>> all the sections about modifying and re-distributing code don't
>> apply when you just want to scan a picture)
> That is not allowed. That would be a modification of the GPL w
Henning Meier-Geinitz, Freitag, 15. März 2002 23:04:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:54:51AM +, Nick Lamb wrote:
> > One of my background tasks (for some months/ years now) has been to
> > create a test backend that does everything the SANE standard says it
> > should, or could, or might.
Have a Epson Perfection 1650 (USB).
works nicely
returns
[epson] sane_start: /dev/usbscanner open (USB) failed: No such device
after modprobe etc. etc.
then /var/log/messages has "Unable to access minor data" for scanner.c
-
Apologies this would seem to be more a USB proble
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:54:09AM +0100, Bertrik Sikken wrote:
> Frank Zago wrote:
> > I've derived scanimage into a test for backend.
..
> > Comments?
>
> I found at least one bug in the niash backend (experimental backend
> for hp3300c) your program, thanks.
..
> The backend that I tested does
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:05:17AM -0600, Frank Zago wrote:
> I've derived scanimage into a test for backend.
> Currently it does not much:
> - options check (get/set, consistent type/range, ...)
> - 2 scans per scan mode (read byte per byte, read random size)
>
> It is not (yet) a replac
21 matches
Mail list logo
