Hi, On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:05:17AM -0600, Frank Zago wrote: > I've derived scanimage into a test for backend. > Currently it does not much: > - options check (get/set, consistent type/range, ...) > - 2 scans per scan mode (read byte per byte, read random size) > > It is not (yet) a replacement for scanimage -T. > > Comments?
Works fine here and has discovered three bugs in the mustek_usb backend that I hadn't noticed yet. Bye, Henning
