On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, paul beard wrote:
> I am really close to getting my scanner to work with NetBSD/macppc
> but now I seem to be tripping over some math functions. I had
> errors on "pow" being undefined, so we swapped them out for "log"
> functions. And I get the same result.
>
> /usr/pkg/lib
Hi,
This new backend supports the Panasonic KV-SS25 scanner. It should also
support the following scanners with some customization:
KV-SS50, KV-SS55, KV-SS50EX, KV-SS55EX, KV-SS850 and KV-SS855.
It is probable that more Panasonic scanners can be supported.
The backend is the alpha stage, but usab
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 01:09:56PM +0100, Mario Giammarco wrote:
> Hello, I have just seen my genius hr6 usb scanner supported in latest
> version of sane.
> I was so happy but I then discovered that scanimage -L gives me no
> positive answer.
>
> I then discovered that my scanner has a produ
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:54:07PM -0600, Frank Zago wrote:
> New diff is:
> http://www.geocities.com/harikus2000/sane/sanecvs-sceptre-20020220-2.diff.gz
It's in CVS now.
Bye,
Henning
Hello, I have just seen my genius hr6 usb scanner supported in latest
version of sane.
I was so happy but I then discovered that scanimage -L gives me no
positive answer.
I then discovered that my scanner has a product id of 2004 and not 2007
as in sane plustek driver.
So I tried to modify plust
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:16:32AM -0800, Art Fore wrote:
> Rene Rebe I think has done a fantastic job on the avision driver for
> the HP5300C, I don't doubt that for a minute, but why does it have to
> have the avision name?
Rene will probably comment this...
Generally spoken there are some
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:59:50AM -0600, Tyler Akins wrote:
> After trying for a *very* long day, I still can't get the sm3600 backend to
> work as expected. I've searched the web and I can't find anyone else that is
> having any problems with their scanner.
>
> Compiling is not a problem.
Hi,
concerning your "/usr/local/bin is not in $PATH" problem: How do you start
your root shell? On my system (which is pretty plain SuSE 7.3 when it comes
to .profile, login scripts etc), /usr/local/bin is included in the path if I
log in as root (i.e. start a shell on a login prompt).
There i
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 02:05:18PM -0800, Art Fore wrote:
> > Documentation for all of this is spread all over and some of it is flat out
> > wrong, especially for these versions.
>
> Please explain in detail which SANE documentation is wrong and which
>
> Hi Henning
> ..cut
> >
> > Maybe I got something wrong here but this is the story how I see it:
> >
> > * You want to use a scanner made by a manufacturer who
> doesn't provide
> > drivers for your operating system
> > * the standard drivers that (most likely) come with your os
> don't supp
You should read the following thread:
http://www.mostang.com/pipermail/sane-devel/2002-February/002410.html
If you can find a contact at Primax, please let me know.
Frank.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Jacek Pliszka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Has somebody go Visioneer OneTouch 8100 working?
>
> If not, how should
I am really close to getting my scanner to work with NetBSD/macppc
but now I seem to be tripping over some math functions. I had
errors on "pow" being undefined, so we swapped them out for "log"
functions. And I get the same result.
/usr/pkg/lib/sane/libsane-umax.so.1: Undefined PLT symbol "l
Hello, I have just seen my genius hr6 usb scanner supported in latest
version of sane.
I was so happy but I then discovered that scanimage -L gives me no
positive answer.
I then discovered that my scanner has a product id of 2004 and not 2007
as in sane plustek driver.
So I tried to modify plust
1. I agree. Well said. I am usually on the "user" end rather than the
"developer" end, but I do understand the issue very well. Though even I
can sometimes ask a dumb question when in haste.
2. Sometimes I am kind of on the "developer" side, too. Scanners are a bit
above my abilities (yet?) but che
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 09:40:07AM -0800, Joe Hudson wrote:
>>I'd like to use SANE to work with a Panasonic KV-S2025 but I don't
>> see any support for any Panasonic scanners at all.
>> Does anybody know if they're available under another name or such?
>
>If it's a SCSI or USB scanner, what d
After trying for a *very* long day, I still can't get the sm3600 backend to
work as expected. I've searched the web and I can't find anyone else that is
having any problems with their scanner.
Compiling is not a problem. Downloading and installing packages is not a
problem either.
I can't get t
Hi Henning
I did not mean to start a flame war going, but I was expressing an opinion.
I did mention also the manufacturers should get their act together as
without their support, the Linux community cannot so their job properly. I
do appreciate the help that I have gotten from the mail list. Rene
Hi Henning
..cut
>
> Maybe I got something wrong here but this is the story how I see it:
>
> * You want to use a scanner made by a manufacturer who doesn't provide
> drivers for your operating system
> * the standard drivers that (most likely) come with your os don't support your
> scanner (
On Thursday 21 February 2002 02:03 am, Thomas Niesel wrote:
>Hi Henning
>..cut
>
>> Maybe I got something wrong here but this is the story how I
>> see it:
>>
>> * You want to use a scanner made by a manufacturer who doesn't
>> provide drivers for your operating system
>> * the standard drivers tha
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:10:23PM -0600, Frank Zago wrote:
> Can somebody review my sceptre backend and integrate it to the cvs tree
> if it's correct?
I'm impressed. You even patched AUTHORS and DISTFILES in Makefile.in :-)
Ok, looking at sceptre.c:
* better use #include "../include/sane/
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 02:05:18PM -0800, Art Fore wrote:
> Documentation for all of this is spread all over and some of it is flat out
> wrong, especially for these versions.
Please explain in detail which SANE documentation is wrong and which
one is at a wrong place. I promise I will fix it
Hi,
I'm currently using a 1640SU with the USB interface. Everything seems
to work fine.
-Ryan
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, [iso-8859-1] Michael Schön wrote:
> Hi!
> I bought this scanner one year ago, i scanned lots of pictures and I
> didn't experience any problems. I connected the scanner via SCSI t
22 matches
Mail list logo
