Dixit Karl Heinz Kremer (2002-01-24 21:36):
> The scanner should show up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' even
> when no scanner driver is loaded. I suspect that something is
> wrong with your cable. You write that you tried both ports,
> can you also try a different cable?
I am ashamed to say t
--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0800, JJ Behrens wrote:
> I'm not able to get scanimage to scan an image on my Epson Perfection 1650
> under FreeBSD. I get the
nathan rutman wrote:
> Right now, I've got a standalone scan utility that talks directly to the
> usb device through the kernel usb scanner driver.
> [ open("/dev/usb/scanner0", O_RDWR), read, write, and
> ioctl(fd, SCANNER_IOCTL_CTRLMSG, &cmsg) ]
You're exactly in the same situation as I was whe
--WulRBKvtygI9tSt8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:17:25PM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote:
> I read somewhere that ++bit would give faster code than bit =3D bit + 1.
> Now my question (as a
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The scanner should show up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' even=20
when no scanner driver is loaded. I suspect that something is
wrong with your cable. You write tha
Whch scanner model/option are you using?
Ulrich Deiters
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:05:50AM +, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote:
> I have been looking at the "best way" to control film holder movement. As far
> as I could tell in 1.0.6 no backend was supporting this (at least the
> coolscan and the canon fs didn't).
>
> Today I had a loo
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote:
> I'll split
> bit = ++bit % 8;
> in the two lines
> bit = ++bit;
> bit %= 8;
>
> in microtek2.c
>
> Henning, could you do this for me in CVS?
I don't thin that this makes any difference.
++bit;
bit %= 8;
should work.
Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote:
>
> > in the two lines
> > bit = ++bit;
>
> This will give the same warning of course!
>
o.k, got it.
>
> > bit %= 8;
>
> Why not just use bit = (bit + 1) % 8, which appears to be the intent?
>
I read somewhere
Congratulations!
The recent Canon backend (version 1.09) checks the scanner version
to find out which options to activate. Can tell us this version
code? It appears, e.g., in the response to the command ioscan
and should we something like "IX-06035E" (which is the code of the
FS2710). We can then
> I am ashamed to say that I simply forgot that the USB function
> was disabled in the BIOS settings... After I enabled it, the
> scanner showed up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' and the command
>
> modprobe scanner vendor=0x04b8 product=0x0110
>
> succeeded. I was then able to scan an imag
Karl,
Thanks for your response.
> The scanner should show up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' even
> when no scanner driver is loaded.
Hmm, you can't do that in FreeBSD 4.4 :)
> I suspect that something is
> wrong with your cable. You write that you tried both ports,
> can you also try a diffe
Just out of curiosity you have your dev links as
/dev/uscanner0
Do you have a USB scanner? Do you want:
/dev/usbscanner or /dev/usbscanner0?
Do these links exist? Sounds silly but I did it once.
Stephen
--
Stephen Torri
Washington University
Department of Computer Science
Email: sto...@cs.wu
I have just connected my new Epson Perfection 1650 scanner to my
RedHat 7.2 system (linux 2.4.7), but it does not seem like the
scanner is detected.
I have added these lines to /etc/modules.conf:
alias usb-controller usb-uhci
The "usbcore" and "usb-uhci" modules are loaded according to lsmod
mh writes:
> I don't know, whether this is what you are looking for, but maybe you want to
> try the attached patch. It places the advanced options to the right side of
> the standard options (and to the left of the gamma widget, if available).
> The dialogs width should stay smaller than 1024
Erik Inge Bolsø writes:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote:
>>I'm new here and scanning under Unix is new for me.
>
> Welcome! :)
>
>>I like xscanimage more than xsane, where xsane makes a core dump when I
>>make a preview scan for transparent media. But I like also the look
fr
Erik Inge Bolsø writes:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote:
>>I'm new here and scanning under Unix is new for me.
>
> Welcome! :)
>
>>I like xscanimage more than xsane, where xsane makes a core dump when I
>>make a preview scan for transparent media. But I like also the look
fr
Andre Herms wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> If you select a gamma value < 1 in xscanimage, you get an inverted output.
> White <-> Black.
> Maybe is because the output values get negative. If I correct the function by
> hand - it works.
>
> I don't know, w
Hey gang, some general questions.
Since I'm still unemployed, I figured I'd go ahead and do a SANE backend
for my scanner (Canon CanonScan fb630u, USB). I was kind of hoping I
could take an existing SANE USB backend and modify it for my purposes.
Right now, I've got a standalone scan utility t
--Boundary-00=_6QAG2NBOWVO2FHDMEA7K
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Martin Klaffenboeck, Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2002 15:35:
...
> But to scan from the transparency unit I have to change the Button in
> the advanced Options from xscanimag
> Just out of curiosity you have your dev links as
>
> /dev/uscanner0
>
> Do you have a USB scanner? Do you want:
>
> /dev/usbscanner or /dev/usbscanner0?
>
> Do these links exist? Sounds silly but I did it once.
Stephen,
Thanks for your reply. When I plug in the scanner, it gets assigned to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
If you select a gamma value < 1 in xscanimage, you get an inverted output.
White <-> Black.
Maybe is because the output values get negative. If I correct the function by
hand - it works.
I don't know, who's responsible for this, so I use the S
Has anyone looked at developing a SANE backend for the Improvision
scanner or any scanner connected through a Dunord interface? If so,
please contact me so we can share information and help each other.
Dave CloseDreamworks SKG, Animation Technology
+1 818 695 6962
I'm not able to get scanimage to scan an image on my Epson Perfection 1650
under FreeBSD. I get the following error message:
tcp# scanimage -d "epson:/dev/uscanner0"
scanimage: open of device epson:/dev/uscanner0 failed: Invalid argument
I know that the device is recognized successfully, because
Hello!
I'm new here and scanning under Unix is new for me.
There is my Epson Perfection 1650 Photo working under FreeBSD now (I
had to insert some lines into the kernel sources).
But I have one Question.
I like xscanimage more than xsane, where xsane makes a core dump when I
make a preview scan
> i do no understand this discussion about the code fragment
> bit =3D ++bit % 8;
> 1. Since 20 years, C is my favorite programming language
> 2. Since some years, I give classes in C
> 3. The code line "bit =3D ++bit % 8", is fully correct.
No. 'bit' is modified twice between sequence po
> > http://coolscan2.sourceforge.net/
>
> I like that:
>
> >Now that I have the specifications for LS-40/4000/8000 from Nikon (a big
> >thank-you goes to Nikon Europe for supporting free software this way),
>
> Definitely good policy from Nikon. If only their scanner was not THAT
> expensive..
According to R.O. Blättner :
> Hi !
>
> I just ordered a Canon FS 4000 US film scanner. :-)
Hmm...
> I couldn't find'em as supported on sane web page. :-(
Thank you Canon.
> Of course, I looked BEFORE ordering, but my considerations to buy
> a film scanner (with reasonable resolution and a
Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If I remeber correct, a SCSI device must be powered on
> when the computer boots to be recognized, isn't it ?
No, that's not strictly necessary. The operating system of course must
know, which devices are attached to a SCSI bus, and during boot / driver
init
--RacQGezy2Y99S6cT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:49:56AM +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> 1. Since 20 years, C is my favorite programming language
C has become defined better in recent years. Take a read of C99, for
instance.
>
--sdOeJE8sLwpQaOMV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote:
> in the two lines
> bit = ++bit;
This will give the same warning of course!
> bit %= 8;
Why not just use bit = (bit + 1) % 8, which appea
Hello
I have been looking at the "best way" to control film holder movement. As far
as I could tell in 1.0.6 no backend was supporting this (at least the
coolscan and the canon fs didn't).
Today I had a look at the coolscan2 project. It allows an option -frame as in:
scanimage -frame 3
My pr
Hi, guys,
i do no understand this discussion about the code fragment
bit = ++bit % 8;
1. Since 20 years, C is my favorite programming language
2. Since some years, I give classes in C
3. The code line "bit = ++bit % 8", is fully correct.
Reason:
a) ++ has higher priority than %
Hi,
I'll split
bit = ++bit % 8;
in the two lines
bit = ++bit;
bit %= 8;
in microtek2.c
Henning, could you do this for me in CVS?
Thanks
Karsten
Tim Waugh schrieb:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:43:35PM +0100, Henning
> Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> > This is with gcc-3.x? I don't get them with
Hi !
I just ordered a Canon FS 4000 US film scanner. :-)
I couldn't find'em as supported on sane web page. :-(
Of course, I looked BEFORE ordering, but my considerations to buy
a film scanner (with reasonable resolution and a fair price) are
going on for 2 years now and I could'nt wait longer.
Hi,
If I remeber correct, a SCSI device must be powered on
when the computer boots to be recognized, isn't it ?
>
> After the machine had been locked for 10 minutes, I
> powered
> off the scanner. The computer came back (I could
> type commands)
> but the scanner was no longer
36 matches
Mail list logo