[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 vs RedHat 7.2: not seen?

2002-01-24 Thread Pierre Sarrazin
Dixit Karl Heinz Kremer (2002-01-24 21:36): > The scanner should show up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' even > when no scanner driver is loaded. I suspect that something is > wrong with your cable. You write that you tried both ports, > can you also try a different cable? I am ashamed to say t

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 on FreeBSD

2002-01-24 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--mojUlQ0s9EVzWg2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0800, JJ Behrens wrote: > I'm not able to get scanimage to scan an image on my Epson Perfection 1650 > under FreeBSD. I get the

[sane-devel] beginning a backend

2002-01-24 Thread Marcio Luis Teixeira
nathan rutman wrote: > Right now, I've got a standalone scan utility that talks directly to the > usb device through the kernel usb scanner driver. > [ open("/dev/usb/scanner0", O_RDWR), read, write, and > ioctl(fd, SCANNER_IOCTL_CTRLMSG, &cmsg) ] You're exactly in the same situation as I was whe

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-beta1

2002-01-24 Thread Tim Waugh
--WulRBKvtygI9tSt8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:17:25PM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote: > I read somewhere that ++bit would give faster code than bit =3D bit + 1. > Now my question (as a

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 vs RedHat 7.2: not seen?

2002-01-24 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The scanner should show up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' even=20 when no scanner driver is loaded. I suspect that something is wrong with your cable. You write tha

[sane-devel] Film holder control

2002-01-24 Thread Deiters
Whch scanner model/option are you using? Ulrich Deiters

[sane-devel] Film holder control (and adf)

2002-01-24 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:05:50AM +, Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida wrote: > I have been looking at the "best way" to control film holder movement. As far > as I could tell in 1.0.6 no backend was supporting this (at least the > coolscan and the canon fs didn't). > > Today I had a loo

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-beta1

2002-01-24 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote: > I'll split > bit = ++bit % 8; > in the two lines > bit = ++bit; > bit %= 8; > > in microtek2.c > > Henning, could you do this for me in CVS? I don't thin that this makes any difference. ++bit; bit %= 8; should work.

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-beta1

2002-01-24 Thread Karsten Festag
Tim Waugh wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote: > > > in the two lines > > bit = ++bit; > > This will give the same warning of course! > o.k, got it. > > > bit %= 8; > > Why not just use bit = (bit + 1) % 8, which appears to be the intent? > I read somewhere

[sane-devel] Canon FS4000US film scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Deiters
Congratulations! The recent Canon backend (version 1.09) checks the scanner version to find out which options to activate. Can tell us this version code? It appears, e.g., in the response to the command ioscan and should we something like "IX-06035E" (which is the code of the FS2710). We can then

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 vs RedHat 7.2: not seen?

2002-01-24 Thread JJ Behrens
> I am ashamed to say that I simply forgot that the USB function > was disabled in the BIOS settings... After I enabled it, the > scanner showed up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' and the command > > modprobe scanner vendor=0x04b8 product=0x0110 > > succeeded. I was then able to scan an imag

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 vs RedHat 7.2: not seen?

2002-01-24 Thread JJ Behrens
Karl, Thanks for your response. > The scanner should show up in 'cat /proc/bus/usb/devices' even > when no scanner driver is loaded. Hmm, you can't do that in FreeBSD 4.4 :) > I suspect that something is > wrong with your cable. You write that you tried both ports, > can you also try a diffe

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 on FreeBSD

2002-01-24 Thread Stephen Torri
Just out of curiosity you have your dev links as /dev/uscanner0 Do you have a USB scanner? Do you want: /dev/usbscanner or /dev/usbscanner0? Do these links exist? Sounds silly but I did it once. Stephen -- Stephen Torri Washington University Department of Computer Science Email: sto...@cs.wu

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 vs RedHat 7.2: not seen?

2002-01-24 Thread Pierre Sarrazin
I have just connected my new Epson Perfection 1650 scanner to my RedHat 7.2 system (linux 2.4.7), but it does not seem like the scanner is detected. I have added these lines to /etc/modules.conf: alias usb-controller usb-uhci The "usbcore" and "usb-uhci" modules are loaded according to lsmod

[sane-devel] xscanimage - advanced Options.

2002-01-24 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
mh writes: > I don't know, whether this is what you are looking for, but maybe you want to > try the attached patch. It places the advanced options to the right side of > the standard options (and to the left of the gamma widget, if available). > The dialogs width should stay smaller than 1024

[sane-devel] xscanimage - advanced Options.

2002-01-24 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Erik Inge Bolsø writes: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: >>I'm new here and scanning under Unix is new for me. > > Welcome! :) > >>I like xscanimage more than xsane, where xsane makes a core dump when I >>make a preview scan for transparent media. But I like also the look fr

[sane-devel] xscanimage - advanced Options.

2002-01-24 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Erik Inge Bolsø writes: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote: >>I'm new here and scanning under Unix is new for me. > > Welcome! :) > >>I like xscanimage more than xsane, where xsane makes a core dump when I >>make a preview scan for transparent media. But I like also the look fr

[sane-devel] XScanimage: Gamma function bugs

2002-01-24 Thread Oliver Rauch
Andre Herms wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > If you select a gamma value < 1 in xscanimage, you get an inverted output. > White <-> Black. > Maybe is because the output values get negative. If I correct the function by > hand - it works. > > I don't know, w

[sane-devel] beginning a backend

2002-01-24 Thread nathan rutman
Hey gang, some general questions. Since I'm still unemployed, I figured I'd go ahead and do a SANE backend for my scanner (Canon CanonScan fb630u, USB). I was kind of hoping I could take an existing SANE USB backend and modify it for my purposes. Right now, I've got a standalone scan utility t

[sane-devel] xscanimage - advanced Options.

2002-01-24 Thread mh
--Boundary-00=_6QAG2NBOWVO2FHDMEA7K Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Martin Klaffenboeck, Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2002 15:35: ... > But to scan from the transparency unit I have to change the Button in > the advanced Options from xscanimag

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 on FreeBSD

2002-01-24 Thread JJ Behrens
> Just out of curiosity you have your dev links as > > /dev/uscanner0 > > Do you have a USB scanner? Do you want: > > /dev/usbscanner or /dev/usbscanner0? > > Do these links exist? Sounds silly but I did it once. Stephen, Thanks for your reply. When I plug in the scanner, it gets assigned to

[sane-devel] XScanimage: Gamma function bugs

2002-01-24 Thread Andre Herms
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, If you select a gamma value < 1 in xscanimage, you get an inverted output. White <-> Black. Maybe is because the output values get negative. If I correct the function by hand - it works. I don't know, who's responsible for this, so I use the S

[sane-devel] Dunord interface and/or Improvision scanner?

2002-01-24 Thread Dave Close
Has anyone looked at developing a SANE backend for the Improvision scanner or any scanner connected through a Dunord interface? If so, please contact me so we can share information and help each other. Dave CloseDreamworks SKG, Animation Technology +1 818 695 6962

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection 1650 on FreeBSD

2002-01-24 Thread JJ Behrens
I'm not able to get scanimage to scan an image on my Epson Perfection 1650 under FreeBSD. I get the following error message: tcp# scanimage -d "epson:/dev/uscanner0" scanimage: open of device epson:/dev/uscanner0 failed: Invalid argument I know that the device is recognized successfully, because

[sane-devel] xscanimage - advanced Options.

2002-01-24 Thread Martin Klaffenboeck
Hello! I'm new here and scanning under Unix is new for me. There is my Epson Perfection 1650 Photo working under FreeBSD now (I had to insert some lines into the kernel sources). But I have one Question. I like xscanimage more than xsane, where xsane makes a core dump when I make a preview scan

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-b

2002-01-24 Thread Ingo Wilken
> i do no understand this discussion about the code fragment > bit =3D ++bit % 8; > 1. Since 20 years, C is my favorite programming language > 2. Since some years, I give classes in C > 3. The code line "bit =3D ++bit % 8", is fully correct. No. 'bit' is modified twice between sequence po

[sane-devel] Nikon Super CoolScan 4000 ED?

2002-01-24 Thread Major A
> > http://coolscan2.sourceforge.net/ > > I like that: > > >Now that I have the specifications for LS-40/4000/8000 from Nikon (a big > >thank-you goes to Nikon Europe for supporting free software this way), > > Definitely good policy from Nikon. If only their scanner was not THAT > expensive..

[sane-devel] Canon FS4000US film scanner

2002-01-24 Thread Hubert Figuiere
According to R.O. Blättner : > Hi ! > > I just ordered a Canon FS 4000 US film scanner. :-) Hmm... > I couldn't find'em as supported on sane web page. :-( Thank you Canon. > Of course, I looked BEFORE ordering, but my considerations to buy > a film scanner (with reasonable resolution and a

[sane-devel] Trouble with Artec AM12S

2002-01-24 Thread abel deuring
Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > > Hi, > > If I remeber correct, a SCSI device must be powered on > when the computer boots to be recognized, isn't it ? No, that's not strictly necessary. The operating system of course must know, which devices are attached to a SCSI bus, and during boot / driver init

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-b

2002-01-24 Thread Tim Waugh
--RacQGezy2Y99S6cT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:49:56AM +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > 1. Since 20 years, C is my favorite programming language C has become defined better in recent years. Take a read of C99, for instance. >

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-beta1

2002-01-24 Thread Tim Waugh
--sdOeJE8sLwpQaOMV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote: > in the two lines > bit = ++bit; This will give the same warning of course! > bit %= 8; Why not just use bit = (bit + 1) % 8, which appea

[sane-devel] Film holder control (and adf)

2002-01-24 Thread Jose Paulo Moitinho de Almeida
Hello I have been looking at the "best way" to control film holder movement. As far as I could tell in 1.0.6 no backend was supporting this (at least the coolscan and the canon fs didn't). Today I had a look at the coolscan2 project. It allows an option -frame as in: scanimage -frame 3 My pr

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-b

2002-01-24 Thread Joachim Backes
Hi, guys, i do no understand this discussion about the code fragment bit = ++bit % 8; 1. Since 20 years, C is my favorite programming language 2. Since some years, I give classes in C 3. The code line "bit = ++bit % 8", is fully correct. Reason: a) ++ has higher priority than %

[sane-devel] C undefined operations in sane-backends-1.0.7-beta1

2002-01-24 Thread Karsten Festag
Hi, I'll split bit = ++bit % 8; in the two lines bit = ++bit; bit %= 8; in microtek2.c Henning, could you do this for me in CVS? Thanks Karsten Tim Waugh schrieb: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:43:35PM +0100, Henning > Meier-Geinitz wrote: > > > This is with gcc-3.x? I don't get them with

[sane-devel] Canon FS4000US film scanner

2002-01-24 Thread R.O. Bl�ttner
Hi ! I just ordered a Canon FS 4000 US film scanner. :-) I couldn't find'em as supported on sane web page. :-( Of course, I looked BEFORE ordering, but my considerations to buy a film scanner (with reasonable resolution and a fair price) are going on for 2 years now and I could'nt wait longer.

[sane-devel] Trouble with Artec AM12S

2002-01-24 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
Hi, If I remeber correct, a SCSI device must be powered on when the computer boots to be recognized, isn't it ? > > After the machine had been locked for 10 minutes, I > powered > off the scanner. The computer came back (I could > type commands) > but the scanner was no longer