Tim Waugh wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 08:12:53AM +0100, Karsten Festag wrote: > > > in the two lines > > bit = ++bit; > > This will give the same warning of course! >
o.k, got it. > > > bit %= 8; > > Why not just use bit = (bit + 1) % 8, which appears to be the intent? > I read somewhere that ++bit would give faster code than bit = bit + 1. Now my question (as a non-expierienced programmer) is if ++bit; bit %= 8; is faster than your suggestion or do you think it makes no difference? Regards Karsten
