Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 03:45:23PM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
[...]
> Considering all this, it might be better to define and implement a new
> interface for sanei_scsi, which avoids these problems, and to write
> wrapper functions for the current interface. This would result too in a
> "more c
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 04:08:35PM +0100, Franz Bakan wrote:
> 1. one */ too much on line 34 of sanei_thread.h after the last changes
>breaks compiling on OS/2
Oops. Fixed in CVS.
> 2. translations work here with Xsane, mustek and epson backends,
Cool.
>but I have to create the .m
Hi,
> When scanning the scanner's complete area (such as in preview), the
> scanning light returns to its original position, but when scanning a
> constrained area, it just sits where it was when it finished scanning.
Can you please send me a debug log of such a scan? Run "export
SANE_DEBUG_SNAP
Hello,
I have an Agfa Snapscan 600 attached to a Adapted 2940AU SCSI controller
using vanilla kernel 2.4.17 and sane 1.0.6.
Sane - no matter which frontend I use - scans fine, the preview picture
appearing correctly resp. the "receiving RGB data" bar filling up.
However, at the end of the scan, th
Hi,
two minor problems
1. one */ too much on line 34 of sanei_thread.h after the last changes
breaks compiling on OS/2
2. translations work here with Xsane, mustek and epson backends,
but I have to create the .mo files manually,
make in sane-backends/po says 'nothing to do'
even if I
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:47:45PM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
> > Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> >
> > > sanei
> > > -
> > > * sanei_scsi: Check return values of req_wait and cmd in case of
> > > SCSI DEVICE BUSY. Better specification of the beha
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 08:23:11AM +, jim.geo...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> I took a chance and installed the CIS version and it worked fine.
>
> What I don't understand is why the CIS version hasn't been officially
> brought into the sane fold...i.e. why do I need to download it separately
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:47:45PM +0100, abel deuring wrote:
> Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>
> > sanei
> > -
> > * sanei_scsi: Check return values of req_wait and cmd in case of
> > SCSI DEVICE BUSY. Better specification of the behaviour of sanei_scsi
> > functions (e.g. retur
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> sanei
> -
> * sanei_scsi: Check return values of req_wait and cmd in case of
> SCSI DEVICE BUSY. Better specification of the behaviour of sanei_scsi
> functions (e.g. return values, timeout 10 min versus 1 min)?
Henning,
what do you mean with "check r
