Hi, On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 03:45:23PM +0100, abel deuring wrote: [...] > Considering all this, it might be better to define and implement a new > interface for sanei_scsi, which avoids these problems, and to write > wrapper functions for the current interface. This would result too in a > "more common" behaviour of the current interface across different > platforms, while the backend authors have also the choice to use a > cleaner interface.
Sounds promising but I'm not sure if it's worth it considering that most new scanners are USB. I will update the TODO list. Bye, Henning
