[sane-devel] HP C5101A Photosmart S20 USB scanner

2002-01-01 Thread Brian
I can't seem to get mine working using sane version 1.0.6. sane-find-scanner sees it, but scanimage and xsane don't see it. Anyone have any suggestions on how to configure this and/or what modules should be used with it? -- Brian - brian...@brimac.com My Home Page: http://www.brimac.com/~brianma

[sane-devel] Need help: Checking in new backend

2002-01-01 Thread Marcio Luis Teixeira
I would like to incorporate the new UMAX 1220U backend for the 1.0.7 release of SANE. How do I go about doing this? Do I need to get CVS access myself, or should I have someone else check the changes in for me? I have available a patch file against the 1.0.6 release that includes my backend, the

[sane-devel] VueScan and SANE

2002-01-01 Thread abel deuring
Maurice Hilarius wrote: > To make a long story short, I tried VueScan, and it failed miserably with > my Microtek X12USL scanner. > I was finally able to get this scanner working to a fairly good degree with > SANE. > > During my attempts to make this work I contacted the author, (and > apparentl

[sane-devel] how do i connect using net interface

2002-01-01 Thread jerry white
Have been trying to connect a user to the scanner through the saned net interface and all i can get is io error msg. using latest sane package and 2.4-16 kernel under mandrake kde2 I have read saned man and set as described syntax i'm using "xsane net:localhost:mustek_pp" what am I doing wrong?

[sane-devel] VueScan and SANE

2002-01-01 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 02:43:40PM -0700, Maurice Hilarius wrote: [...] > In looking at what he provides I believe that he is likely breaking the GPL > already.. [...] > And his blatant admission that he is using SANE code in his product really > seals it for me, at least: > "I use the same

[sane-devel] an [off-topic?] question: Acer ScanWit 2720S

2002-01-01 Thread Steve Underwood
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:58:24PM +0300, Max Ushakov wrote: > >or this is ``reverse engineering'' and so unlawful, or >what? > Most countries still define reverse engineering for the purposes of compatible interworking as a specifically lawful thing to do. Without such a thing much of indus