[sane-devel] [dev] net backend and timing problems? (pretty weird)

2001-09-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 02:54:32PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:54:49AM +0200, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > > The problem here is, my net backend just doesn't crash, no matter what i > > do :( > > CVS-versions of net.c and sanei_wire.c: > > Tested with scanima

[sane-devel] [dev] net backend and timing problems? (pretty weird)

2001-09-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:34:19PM +0200, mh wrote: > when I try to scan over saned (localhost) using the net/plustek backend, the > frontend crashes with a bt like this: One problem found: pnm doesn't follow the SANE standard in case of EOF. It just returns SANE_STATUS_EOF without setting *l

[sane-devel] --gamma-table: totally baffled

2001-09-09 Thread Ferenc
Hi, First, thank you all for coding this great piece of software. It allows me to build a web-interface to my Mustek 12000SP scanner. This brings me to my problem: dark scans. It would seem a gamma- correction of about 2 would solve this. I wish to do this in the scanimage commandline options,

[sane-devel] Acer 640BU :-(

2001-09-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0400, Desmond Rivet wrote: > This is apparently a developers mailing list. Ummm...I'm I'm in the > wrong place, could you kindly point wher I should look? You are at the right place. However, I don't know your scanner. > T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 C

[sane-devel] Acer 640BU :-(

2001-09-09 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, > This is apparently a developers mailing list. Ummm...I'm I'm in the > wrong place, could you kindly point wher I should look? There's only this one list, so that's the place to ask questions. > ... > As you can see, I have a device listed as "Vendor=04a5 ProdID=207e Rev= > 1.00". I checked

[sane-devel] [ANN] SnapScan: new backend version 20010909

2001-09-09 Thread Oliver Schwartz
Hi, I've released a new version of the Snapscan backend. The most important changes are: - Merged with Sane-1.0.5 - Merged changes from Acer - Automatic firmware upload for USB scanners - Support for Prisa3300, Prisa4300, and Prisa5300 - Better calculation of remaining bytes in

[sane-devel] Acer 640BU :-(

2001-09-09 Thread Desmond Rivet
Hi again, > > This is apparently a developers mailing list. Ummm...I'm I'm in the > > wrong place, could you kindly point wher I should look? > > You are at the right place. However, I don't know your scanner. I have the Acer 640BU :) > > T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12

[sane-devel] Problems with Epson 636U

2001-09-09 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable James, unfortunately I am not familiar with Sane and any flavour of BSD systems. A core dump does not help, there is an easier way of getting more informati= on: Y

[sane-devel] no devices available

2001-09-09 Thread Karl Heinz Kremer
--H1spWtNR+x+ondvy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: [ ... ] >=20 > > T: Bus=3D01 Lev=3D01 Prnt=3D01 Port=3D01 Cnt=3D01 Dev#=3D 2 Spd=3D12 = Mx

[sane-devel] Epson 1640US and Sane 1.0.5

2001-09-09 Thread Roy Murphy
'Twas brillig when Karl Heinz Kremer scrobe: > do you have an USB adapter in your computer? If so, could you try > it with USB so that we can rule out a problem with the backend (which > is very unlikely because others have reported success with this > device). I've finally gotten the scanner co

[sane-devel] Problems with Epson 636U

2001-09-09 Thread James O'Test
I just got myself a Epson636u Scanner and am having a bit of a problem with it. I am new to scanning in general, so as I will try to give all the info that one might need to help me on this, feel free to hit me with the clue stick if I leave something out. This is on a FreeBSD 4.4RC machine. Sc

[sane-devel] Epson GT5000 parallel port scanner - yet again

2001-09-09 Thread Tony Lindop
Karl, Many thanks for your help! The information on Christian's web site was just what I was looking for. The scanner worked first time on following his instructions. I will be sending him some information on my hardware, which differs from his site. All I need to do now is get xscanimage recogn

[sane-devel] Acer 640BU :-(

2001-09-09 Thread Desmond Rivet
Hi all, This is apparently a developers mailing list. Ummm...I'm I'm in the wrong place, could you kindly point wher I should look? I have an Acer 640BU scanner that doesn't appear to be working. I run RedHat7.1 linux. My USB system is apparently working, and my scanner is recognized at that leve

[sane-devel] no devices available

2001-09-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 03:45:12PM +0200, jochen georges wrote: > sorry for the newbie question on an devel-list, but i did not find the help i > need. As this is the only list for SANE, it's ok to ask all SANE-related questions here. > i try to get my epson perfection640u (usb) scanner run

[sane-devel] no devices available

2001-09-09 Thread jochen georges
hello sorry for the newbie question on an devel-list, but i did not find the help i need. i try to get my epson perfection640u (usb) scanner running with sane and xsane. but xsane always says "no devices available". i know it should work, the scanner is supported. i found a mini howto in the

[sane-devel] [dev] net backend and timing problems? (pretty weird)

2001-09-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:54:49AM +0200, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > The problem here is, my net backend just doesn't crash, no matter what i > do :( CVS-versions of net.c and sanei_wire.c: Tested with scanimage -T, pnm over localhost. Small files: no problem. Big files (15 MB in this case):

[sane-devel] Re: Possible Kodak DC-240 backend?

2001-09-09 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi, On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:45:03AM -0500, Peter Fales wrote: > I've attached my proposed changes for acinclude.m4 and configure.in Do you really need this check? Shouldn't it be enough to check at run-time in the gphoto2.c? If I remember correctly, as6e does it similarly. The check doesn't w

[sane-devel] Re: Possible Kodak DC-240 backend?

2001-09-09 Thread Peter Fales
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 02:10:23PM +0200, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:45:03AM -0500, Peter Fales wrote: > > I've attached my proposed changes for acinclude.m4 and configure.in >