[sage-support] Re: Umlauts in Notebook cells do not work (encoding problem)

On Apr 12, 1:24 pm, Lars Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Hi Lars, > after reading Use Sage, not PowerPoint by Hector Villafuerte I created > a worksheet onwww.sagenb.org > with title TheUmlautProblem and published it. > > It shows what happens and it happens also on sagenb. So I th

[sage-support] Re: Expired security certificate, < https://www.sagenb.org/ >

On Apr 14, 10:20 pm, "dean moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The site at has done this awhile: the site's > security certificate expired on February 19, > 2008 at 10:22 PM (see image). > > Just FYI. > > Dean Hi Dean, this is #2351 and a blocker. I think William did

[sage-support] Re: Can I still get binaries for version 2.10.4?

On Apr 16, 3:27 pm, terry-s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [2nd attempt] > Thanls for your reply. > > On Apr 16, 1:19 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On Wed, Apr > 16, 2008 at 5:02 AM, terry-s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >  Now that 2.11 has been released, are the older linux

[sage-support] Re: Can I still get binaries for version 2.10.4?

On Apr 16, 9:01 pm, terry-s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 16, 6:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM, terry-s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >  ok, I've tried out the instructions. > > > >  [1] On the desktop, the binary file downloaded

[sage-support] Re: Posets or others

On Apr 17, 6:22 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >  Dear Group, > > >  What support is there for posets and/or totally ordered sets in Sage? > >  It doesn't seem to be in the Reference manual.  Nor is it in th

[sage-support] Re: Dokchitser's L-functions Calculator

On Apr 18, 10:20 am, Kirill Vankov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a lot!  I am sure it is the interface problem, but I am still > too new in python to understand all the details. > > Overall SAGE works great and it is so easy to use.  I wish there will > be Sage Days Europe soon ;) > > ~Kir

[sage-support] Re: bug in DirichletGroup?

On Apr 19, 11:28 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, this is definitely a bug. Definitely report it to trac. > > Done:http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2959 > I set the milestone as 3.0.1 since I thought Michael said no more > new tickets in 3.0. Well, I said no mo

[sage-support] Re: Newbie: jmol black screen

On Apr 21, 1:59 am, gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Gary, > I've installed sage 2.11 on Kubuntu 7.10, and I'm   poking around. > > In the tutorial, sec 2.9.2 (?) there are 3D graphics examples using > jmol.  When I run these (adding show(P) to the scripts) jmol reports > that it is starting

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 23, 12:18 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi Osman, > I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch > Linux. It works without any problem. > However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3,  I am getting > the following errors when I run the sage aft

[sage-support] Sage 3.0 released

[Note: If you are interested in announcements only please subscribe to sage-announce. It is limited to roughly one email every ten days.] Hello folks, Sage 3.0 has been released on April 21st, 2008. It is available at http://sagemath.org/download.html * About Sage (http://www.sagema

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 23, 7:02 pm, "Andrzej Giniewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > >  > I have installed sage-3.0 from pre-compiled binary version in Arch > >  > Linux. It works without any problem. > >  > However, if I compile it from source code using gcc-4.3,  I am getting > >  > the following erro

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 23, 11:12 pm, "Andrzej Giniewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi Andrzej, > >  > interesting, I built sage successfully and don't have those errors - > >  > using Arch and no SAGE_ANYTHING environment variables... I noticed I > >  > have other release data - was you trying 3.0 (later

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 24, 10:30 am, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, Hi Osman, > > I doubt compilation finished successfully in your case. You need to > > set SAGE_FORTAN to the system fortran since the g95 we ship is broken > > on Arch. We didn't automate that so far and we have been discussing o

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 24, 6:48 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > - Hide quoted text - > Hi Osman, > > Since I am relatively clueless about Arch can you poke around and tell me > > what version of gdbm you have installed? > > gdbm-1.8.3-5 and this is the version used in Arch linux since > 19.11.

[sage-support] Re: Errors upgrading to SAGE 3.0 on Macbook with OSX 10.4.11 (Intel)

On Apr 26, 12:31 am, Cotati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Sage binary was  sage-3.0-osx10.5-Intel-i386-Darwin.dmg  dated > April 22nd, 6:19pm which I downloaded this afternoon from the Sage > website downloads page for Mac binaries. > My machine is a Macbook (laptop) running OSX 10.4.11, Darwin

[sage-support] Re: Errors upgrading to SAGE 3.0 on Macbook with OSX 10.4.11 (Intel)

On Apr 26, 12:41 am, Cotati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 25, 3:31 pm, Cotati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Sage binary was  sage-3.0-osx10.5-Intel-i386-Darwin.dmg  dated > > April 22nd, 6:19pm which I downloaded this afternoon from the Sage > > website downloads page for Mac binari

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 25, 10:21 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sound pretty much like it could be. Can you take vanilla python 2.5.2 > > on your box, build from source and then check if the gdbm extension > > compiles [I think it won't]. Can you then build gdbm from source and > > use that version to

[sage-support] Re: sage -i question

On Apr 26, 3:14 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi: > > I'm wondering why is it that > rm -rf "$SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/$GAP/pkg/" > mkdir "$SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/$GAP/pkg/" > occurs in the spkg-install script for gap_packages*? > Is there a reason why the old packages are deleted? Hi

[sage-support] Re: what are the optional packages?

On Apr 26, 11:47 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi John, > What are the optional packages? Right now if I type 'sage -optional', > I get a list like this: > > NOT INSTALLED: > biopython-1.44 > database_sloane_oeis-2005-12 > > (etc.) > > It would be very helpful if I got something

[sage-support] Re: ubuntu 8.04

On Apr 26, 10:50 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:26 PM, teck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >  I have installed new ubuntu 8.04 hardy heron and downloaded sage but > >  when I run it, firefox only displays this warning: > > >  Secure Connection Failed >

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 26, 5:54 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > I would suspect you need to do the following thing: > > a) cd into $SAGE_ROOT > > b) source local/bin/sage/env > > c) patch the python.spkg, then run ./spkg-install from its base > > directory > > d) cd into $SAGE_ROOT again

[sage-support] Re: Sage-3.0 run-time errors in Arch linux

On Apr 25, 10:21 pm, ugus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sound pretty much like it could be. Can you take vanilla python 2.5.2 > > on your box, build from source and then check if the gdbm extension > > compiles [I think it won't]. Can you then build gdbm from source and > > use that version to

[sage-support] Re: ubuntu 8.04

On Apr 27, 11:54 pm, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 26, 11:59 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > dortmund.de> wrote: Hi, > > but jmol, i.e. 3D plotting, is currently broken with FF3B5. > > It's not really, this is the icetea java plugin

[sage-support] Re: ubuntu 8.04

On Apr 28, 12:39 pm, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 28, 4:43 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > dortmund.de> wrote: Hi Harald, > > Arrg, iced tea is *still* broken with jmol? Maybe somebody ought to > > poke the jmol people if there i

[sage-support] Re: bug: unix commands do not like backslashes and numbers

sts.  There are also > >  errors when cd-ing to a directory that contains a number in its name. > > >  sage: cd sage-3.0/ > >  [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'sage-RealNumber(3.0)/' > >  /opt The likely issue here is that the preparser gets a hold of 3.0 and

[sage-support] Re: bug: unix commands do not like backslashes and numbers

On Apr 29, 5:40 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 28, 2008, at 11:32 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > The file system underneath Sage is for now a Unix file system which > > uses "space" as a separator. It is generally a bad idea to use > > a

[sage-support] Re: bug: unix commands do not like backslashes and numbers

On Apr 29, 5:57 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:52 AM, mabshoff > >  b) The preparser, i.e. 3.0->RealNumber(3.0): This is a more general > >  issue, i.e. people get bitten by it when using numpy/scipy regularly. &

[sage-support] Re: Fwd: Must SELinux be disabled to run sage?

On Apr 29, 9:53 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I'm running Sage on a RedHat EL box with SELinux turned on (and >  enforcing).   Getting Sage to work with SELinux is not the problem, it is more knowing which roles are available and how to convince the OS to set them. It is l

[sage-support] Re: Cannot plot in SAGE 3.0 for MAC OS 10.4

On Apr 30, 2:08 am, JoelS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I found the same problem using SAGE 3.0 on a MacBook running OS X. > 4.11. Same behavior in both command line and notebook. > > Here's the error report that resulted from trying to plot from command > line: > > * > > sage: plot(sin(x

[sage-support] Re: XDroplets for SAGE integration to Mac OS X

On Apr 30, 3:06 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > The README file for SAGE's Mac OS X version mentions that easier > environment integration would be in order, were a Mac OS X developer > to help. I don't need it myself – I actually prefer to call SAGE > manually after o

[sage-support] Re: XDroplets for SAGE integration to Mac OS X

On Apr 30, 6:57 am, "Greg Landweber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Greg, > You don't need any fancy droplets or applets. You can just use the > following AppleScript to activate Sage (take this script and save it > as an AppleScript application, then put it in the same directory as > the "sage

[sage-support] Re: newbie question

On Apr 30, 11:29 am, shyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Hi, > Just got started with sage vmware in windows Welcome to the club ;) > My question is that I am unable to see the plot diagrams generated by > the plot command or other matplotlib commands on the vmware console. > Nor do I see a

[sage-support] Re: Bug: Cayley Graph

On Apr 30, 11:34 am, "M. Fix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello- Hi, > I input the following: > > sage: s1 = SymmetricGroup(1) > sage: s = s1.cayley_graph() > sage: s.vertices() > [] > > Shouldn't the set of vertices have one element in it for the > identity?  s1 reports this element, but as

[sage-support] Re: Question about calling Cython code

On May 1, 7:03 am, "Stephen Hartke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Stephen, > Thanks for the information!  Using "Integer=int" has fixed most of my > problems.  Turning off the preparser prevents "load cfuncs.spyx" from > working, so I haven't been using that. > > The main problem in my code, I d

[sage-support] Re: Bug: Cayley Graph

Hi, I have made this http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3070 and assigned it to boothy, so he will get an email about it ;) Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[sage-support] Re: sage-3.0-linux_ubuntu-athlon-i686-Linux.tar.gz does not work

On May 2, 9:38 pm, Lars Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Hi, > today I tried to install sage 3.0 from > sage-3.0-linux_ubuntu-athlon-i686-Linux.tar.gz > (By the way, why is this file 80 megs smaller than the others?) It is a binary compiled by a third party and we can't test it dir

[sage-support] Re: rpy version mismatch

On May 4, 11:35 pm, Art <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am unsuccessful at using rpy through the sage notebook. A Traceback > is appended. I am assuming this is the sage interface to R (through > 'from rpy import r'). I have spent the last few hours learning the > rudiments of sage, python, R, an

[sage-support] Re: rpy version mismatch

On May 5, 9:27 am, Art <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Art, > Thanks for the pointer to the default R interface. I had read about it > somewhere in your docs but couldn't find it again. > > Not sure how I missed #3011. I solved the original problem by > installing debian package python-rpy (1.0.1

[sage-support] Sage 3.0.1 released

Hello folks, Sage 3.0.1 has been released on May 4th, 2008. It is available at http://sagemath.org/download.html * About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org) Sage is developed by volunteers and combines 71 open source packages. It is available for download from sagemath.org and its mirror

[sage-support] Re: build problem for 3.0.1 on ubuntu 7.10amd64

On May 7, 12:29 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi David, > Replying to my own email again, I built 3.0.1 from for the 3rd time and, > even, though the build goes fine apparently, at starting sage from the > command line, I get the same import error, even for the "uncorrupted" > d

[sage-support] Re: build problem for 3.0.1 on ubuntu 7.10amd64

On May 7, 1:10 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:41 AM, mabshoff Hi David, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >  On May 7, 12:29 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >  Hi David, &

[sage-support] Re: build problem for 3.0.1 on Open Suse 10.2

On May 7, 3:59 pm, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there > > I tried to build 3.0.1 on Open Suse 10.2 and received an error message > > " > error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 > sage: There was an error installing modified sage library code. > " > > I am unsure if this is a Sus

[sage-support] Re: build problem for 3.0.1 on Open Suse 10.2

On May 7, 4:06 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: Hi Robert, > > I tried to build 3.0.1 on Open Suse 10.2 and received an error message I poked around in your log file a little more and it seem to indicate that you use OpenSuSE 10.1 and not 10.2. That is indicate

[sage-support] Re: bug in trac's diff?

On May 9, 9:42 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > That's what it shows for a new file added to the repository, so the > diff it shows is the diff between the new file and nothing, i.e. > /dev/null.  I think! That is correct. I still consider this odd, but you can always downloa

[sage-support] Re: md5sums of source code tarballs on download page?

On May 9, 8:46 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the download page for the source code [1] it would be useful if, next > to each link, there was a link to an md5sum (or sha1sum, etc) of the > tarball. I know we've seen some corrupted downloads, and if an md5sum > link is easy to find

[sage-support] Re: Fwd: problem upgrading sage

On May 9, 11:45 am, "Eduardo Ocampo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi! Hi Eduardo, > Sage does not work anymore after upgrading, and i dont have any idea what > could be the problem...could you please tell me what should I do? You do not have m4 installed. Did you compile the original Sage fro

[sage-support] Re: Will Sage run on a 4GB Asus Eee PC?

On May 9, 9:27 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi David, > It turns out that next year it is very possible that all USNA freshamn will > have > an asus eee. The debate seems to be about the amount of ram it should have. > I can borrow one next week. It has xandros linux 500M ram,

[sage-support] Re: Will Sage run on a 4GB Asus Eee PC?

On May 9, 10:35 pm, "Glenn H Tarbox, PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Glen, > I have an asus eee sitting around... I put eeexbuntu on it so its not > running the original os (btw, I recommend this... but there must be > downsides) I wouldn't stick with Xandros either ;) > I could easily nail

[sage-support] Re: Jmol black screen in Notebook

On May 11, 2:55 pm, "walter neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Walter, > No, It is a Dell Latitude D410, 2G memory and 1.73Ghz processor. Are you sure Firefox uses the Sun Java plugin? Just because the demo at the jmol website works doesn't mean that it will work in Sage. You certainly seem

[sage-support] Re: batch controller

On May 14, 11:56 am, Royc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Roy, > I have catch controller v1, installed first in 1999. > It now needs re-installing on my server, sage will not give me > activation key, because its too old and unsupported, has anyone any > ideas how to activate it, without phoning s

[sage-support] Re: batch controller

On May 14, 12:41 pm, Royc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Roy, > Although the software I am using says its Promis Batch Controller, its > is now owned by sage, and called Sage Batch Controller We have *zero* to do with the accounting software Sage, i.e. this is about Computer Algebra which is

[sage-support] Re: installation on Windows XP using cygwin rather than VMware player?

On May 14, 3:15 pm, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, > Dear All, has anyone been able to succesfully install Sage 3.0.1 on a > Windows XP using cygwin pc rather than using the VMware player? If so, > could you please let me know how to go about doing this? Thank you. Support for bui

[sage-support] Re: installation on Windows XP using cygwin rather than VMware player?

On May 14, 5:13 pm, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, > Dear Michael, I would be happy to wait a few weeks for the Cygwin port > to work and then give it a try. How would I know that the Cygwin port > is working and how I should go about usung it? Thanks. Robert I am pretty sure we w

[sage-support] Re: Problem in Programming Guide Cython example

On May 19, 7:18 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I thought this was fixed in the latest release. Until then, I guess,   > you can install the spkg athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ > robertwb/cython/ > > Download cython-0.9.6.14.p1.spkg and type "sage -i   > cython-0.9.

[sage-support] Re: SAGE 3.0.1

On May 19, 8:00 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Lon Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the prompt reply! One more question: the screenshot on the SAGE > > website shows Sage running in the X11 environment, is having X11 installe

[sage-support] Re: Problem in Programming Guide Cython example

On May 19, 7:39 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 19, 2008, at 10:28 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > there hasn't been an official release with the fixed Cython yet, just > > 3.0.2.alpha0 and alpha1. It is now likely that 3.0.2 will be out in 48 > >

[sage-support] Re: Anybody have a SPEC file to build a Fedora RPM or configure script for Debian for SAGE 3.0.1

PJ wrote: Hi PJ, > Today in the Fedora Linux list, a person asked if there was a Fedora > project to build & distribute SAGE. He spoke with such enthusiasm > about SAGE that I became interested to see what it does and I'm > compiling it right now (I figure there's no point in trying to package

[sage-support] Re: simple way to link libraries to .pyx in sage?

On May 22, 2:04 am, tkeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Thomas, > You were correct, it doesn't try to rebuild everything, just modules > that have changed.  However, I am now getting the following error > message: > running build_ext > building 'pyrna' extension > error: unknown file type '.py

[sage-support] Re: SAGE, Maxima and idle don't work well together

On Apr 26, 7:39 am, freq_fraq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello. > > recently I've installed SAGE 3.0 on my computer (ubuntu 7.10). > everything works great when I'm working from the sage shell, or from > the notebook. > > However it's very difficult to get real work done from the shell, so > I

[sage-support] Sage 3.0.2 released

Hello folks, Sage 3.0.2 has been released on May 24th, 2008. It is available at http://sagemath.org/download.html * About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org) Sage is developed by volunteers and combines 71 open source packages. It is available for download from sagemath.org and its mirro

[sage-support] Re: installation on Windows XP using cygwin rather than VMware player?

On May 26, 4:12 pm, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, > Dear Michael, Is it worth me trying to "port" sage-3.0.2 to cygwin? Up until the 2.5.0 release of Sage we did support building Sage on Cygwin, but then support was dropped due to numerous small problems as well as libSingular no

[sage-support] Re: 'R not built with PNG support' , also jpeg fails in ubuntu binary

On May 31, 3:55 pm, tkeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Thomas, > I got all the dependencies needed to build R using sudo apt-get build- > dep r-base, and now everything works great.  Unfortunately I can't > point out exactly what dependencies were needed as that command > installed about 100

[sage-support] Re: sage gives me an error after installing some optional pkgs

On May 31, 6:01 pm, niner_night <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm NOT sure which pkg. I installed the gcc4.2.1, biopython-1.45, > kash3_linux-2006, mpi4py-0.3.1, openmpi-1.1.4, openssl-0.9.8d.p1, > pyopenssl-0.6, > pyx-0.10, and all the database ones. > Iam running Kubuntu Linux 8.04 x86_64. Do *n

[sage-support] Re: Running a sage script from command line caused a run away pocess

Hi, I *think* the problem is in the sage-cleaner, specifically the following code: def kill_spawned_jobs(file, parent_pid): #print "killing %s's spawned jobs"%parent_pid killed_them_all = True for L in open(file).readlines(): #print L i = L.find(' ') pid = L[:

[sage-support] Re: latex

On May 31, 9:47 pm, Alyson Deines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Aly, > I'm running sage version 3.0.2 on kubuntu. > I'm having trouble using Latex in notebook (and I've check and I do > have pdflatex installed) > ! LaTeX Error: File `fullpage.sty' not found. According to http://ubuntuforums

[sage-support] Re: Sage does not work after build.

On Jun 1, 2:32 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/1 David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I think John was referring to /home/mozork/.sage/ (which is where some > > SAGE stuff is > > saved). I think he suggested deleting it and then starting SAGE. > > Yes, that is what

[sage-support] Re: Sage does not work after build.

On Jun 1, 7:03 pm, Mozork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Mozork, > Ok, I've downloaded the latest version (3.0.2) and compiled it > elsewhere than my home directory and it seems to work. Ok, that is good to know. > Thanks for the help. Sure, please let us know if you run into any more trouble.

[sage-support] Re: coercion problem?

On Jun 3, 3:49 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Thanks. I reported this ashttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3353 prun indicates that we are calling GAP in z.next() somewhere, so due to pexpect overhead this also should suck. "prun z.next()" took *35* CPU seconds on s

[sage-support] Re: SAGE on CentOS

On Jun 3, 1:59 pm, Melissa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi- Hi Melissa, > I'm sort of new to compiling things from source [and new to CentOS]. I > followed the instructions detailed in the .pdf for compiling from > source, including making sure I had the necessary repos. However, I > know it d

[sage-support] Re: How to run a server remotely?

On Jun 3, 6:16 pm, Mats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Mats, > Hey it happens sometimes; at least you guys help users with a > quickfix. =) Thank you. ;) > One might prevent such future problems by adding this to unit tests > (if it doesn't exist already) and checking before release. We have

[sage-support] Re: SAGE online notebook registration problem

On Jun 3, 11:40 pm, Runde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Runde, > I tried to register twice on the online notebook > athttps://sage.math.washington.edu:8102, > and after the registration page it says that my user name is taken (as > expected). But, it still sends me a confirmation email. I click

[sage-support] Re: SAGE online notebook registration problem

On Jun 4, 5:27 am, "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, Hi Timothy, > I confirmed earlier what was reported. When one tries to sign up with > a username already taken the new user is still sent a confirmation > e-mail. Yep, I completely missed the point of this email, sorry f

[sage-support] Re: set membership and element equality

On Jun 4, 12:28 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:13:25 -0700 (PDT) > > > > Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I want to add elements of the fraction field of QQ[x,y] to a set, > > i.e., make sure there are no repeats.  However, set.add()ing an > > element tha

[sage-support] Re: BLAS routines required by linbox are not installed

On Jun 4, 4:37 pm, "Eduardo Ocampo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, Hi Eduardo, > this is my second call for help! When did you report this problem previously? I did not see it or maybe I just don't remember. > does anybody know how to solve this > problem??? this problem have ocurre

[sage-support] Re: error compiling sage: pari and libgmp mismatch - fixed

On Jun 9, 8:57 am, lciti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi Luca, > I just installed sage in the main node of a cluster. I got an error > while it was building pari. > The error was > "skipping incompatible /home/lciti/opt/sage-3.0.2/local/lib/libgmp.so > when searching for -lgmp" > I discovere

[sage-support] www.sagenb.com's SSL certificate updated

Hello folks, I *just* replaced the current SSL certificate of www.sagenb.com that was only valid for another couple weeks with one that expires five years from now. So your browser will likely complain about the new certificate, but that is expected If you are using a FireFox 3 based browser you

[sage-support] Re: Sage + Eclipse + PyDev

On Jun 10, 9:49 am, Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone. Hi Emerson, > I'm trying to set up sage to work with pydev on Eclipse. So far, I've > managed to set the interpreter properly (it does seem to work > properly). The problem is that when I try to do this... > > from sage.a

[sage-support] Re: error compiling sage: pari and libgmp mismatch - fixed

On Jun 10, 7:55 am, lciti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, Hi Luca, > thank you for your reply. No problem. > I think it is something related to gmp. It is the only one that falls > in this error. > After the fix it gets configured for a x86_64 machine and not for a > core duo > (and a

[sage-support] Re: simplifying exponents

On Jun 10, 10:44 am, polo0691 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Thanks for creating sage! I can really see how useful sage could be > for engineering purposes. I've been playing around with sage for a > couple of days and I have had trouble with the following: > >   1) simplifying equations with

[sage-support] Re: error compiling sage: pari and libgmp mismatch - fixed

Hi Luca, the problem you are having is discussed at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel/t/c31f89ed1683d383 You might want to come over and give some feedback since it cuts mw out of the loop and will hopefully result in a quicker resolution. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~-

[sage-support] Re: Can't build SAGE on RHEL4 64bit

On Jun 17, 8:01 am, just_a_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, Hi Hans, > I've tried to build sage 2.11 and 3.0.2 on a linux cluster, Opteron > 2212 and 8212 chips (rev F) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.11]# uname -a > Linux abacus.bw01.math.umass.edu 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Mon Sep 25 >

[sage-support] Re: Can't build SAGE on RHEL4 64bit

On Jun 17, 10:50 am, just_a_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, Hi, I didn't have much time yesterday, but I took a look an it is ATLAS/ Lapack related. >    Thanks for the reply!  I've put a zipped version of install.log on > my webpage, last link > on the left: > >            www.

[sage-support] Re: Can't build SAGE on RHEL4 64bit

On Jun 18, 11:06 am, just_a_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, Hi Hans, >    I tried to build 3.0.2 again, which failed.  The new zipped log > file is posted on my webpage:  www.math.umass.edu/~johnston > > Just to let you know, for this build I MOVED my g77, g95, and gfortran > to

[sage-support] Re: gmp build fail on fedora 9

On Jun 21, 7:35 pm, dbk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, Hi Don, > I'm getting a strange configure problem building 3.02 on fedora 9 > running on X86_64 system; The problem is not FC9 specific, see below for more info. > First I get; >

[sage-support] Re: ABI Selection Error for GMP in Sage3.0.3 on x86_64 System

On Jun 22, 4:44 pm, JohnBussoletti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi John, > I tried to build sage-3.0.3 on my work system, a 64 bit dual core, > dual Xeon system running RHEL 4, I believe (output of cat /proc/ > version shows: > > Linux version 2.6.9-67.0.1.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED] > bc1-14.build.r

[sage-support] Re: ABI Selection Error for GMP in Sage3.0.3 on x86_64 System

On Jun 23, 11:08 pm, JohnBussoletti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you post the output for at least one CPU from /proc/cpuinfo? Hi John, > Okay, here's the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo: > > processor       : 0 > vendor_id       : GenuineIntel > cpu family      : 15 > model           : 6 > mod

[sage-support] Re: Sage doesnt complete my more "challanging" tasks

On Jun 24, 1:31 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not a feature of Sage as such but of Groebner basis > computations generally.  They go very quickly from easy to impossible > when, for example, you increase the number of variables. > > I have not tried it but I would not b

[sage-support] Re: ABI Selection Error for GMP in Sage3.0.3 on x86_64 System

On Jun 24, 6:59 pm, JohnBussoletti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, Hi John, > I interrupted the sage build during the construction of gmp, went to > the spkg/build/gmp-4.2.2/src directory and diff-ed the configure file > against the configure file that I obtained from a direct download o

[sage-support] Re: SAGE on 64-bit SuSE Enterprise Server 10 SP2?

On Jun 25, 1:03 am, Miron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Hi Miron, > I have successfully built SAGE on a number of systems but I am having > problems with > building it on DELL Precision-5400 running new 64-bit SLES 10 SP2. > > Unpacking "sage-3.0.3-suse-linux64bit-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz"  a

[sage-support] Re: sage and linux powerpc

On Jun 25, 1:09 pm, Bin Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi Bin, > I want to know what is the status of support for Linux powerpc. It usually works, due to access to fast hardware (I also have a G4 iBook) I rarely build it. But any problem should be reported and fixed. > Linux powerpc

[sage-support] Re: sage and linux powerpc

On Jun 27, 7:28 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - "Bin Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Hi Bin, > Maybe I advanced a little in this problem. I found that your patch > ATLAS-3.8.1-ppc-g4-7447-detect-fix.patch is not applied in sage. After > applying this patch, it can detect architect

[sage-support] Re: Update SAGE: sws files lost!

On Jun 29, 12:52 pm, Rolandb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > A huge dissatisfier for the third time .. > > I update VMARE (to version 2.04) and thereafter SAGE (from 3.0 to > 3.0.3). > > This is the third time I lost all my notebook files (sws) ... > > How can this be avoided!! Please help, bec

[sage-support] Re: Performance problem in sage-3.0.2 and sage-3.0.3

On Jul 2, 4:11 pm, Daryl Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Daryl, > I recently did a clean install of Fedora 9 (formerly running Fedora 8) > and then > installed sage-3.0.3 from source (formerly running sage-3.0).  After > running > "sage -testall" I ran a couple of my own programs. > > I wa

[sage-support] Re: Performance problem in sage-3.0.2 and sage-3.0.3

On Jul 2, 7:09 pm, "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Daryl Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Alec, > > SAGE Version 3.0, Release Date: 2008-04-23 > > array size:       1000 > > number of primes: 664580 > > Elapsed seconds:  70.93 > > That seems to be quite slow anyway. It

[sage-support] Re: Performance problem in sage-3.0.2 and sage-3.0.3

On Jul 3, 3:30 pm, Daryl Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Daryl, > David, I have both install logs available.  I have edited them "down" > to about 3,600 lines and 280 KB each.  I hesitate to post that much > data here. you should not send the logs themselves to the list, but if possible p

[sage-support] Re: graphviz installation problem

On Jul 5, 3:54 am, iSAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Sorry, a little correction: > I issued the command sage -i graphviz-2.16.1.p0 which gave errors, but > nauty could be installed without trouble. Yep, I would only install one spkg at a time. > On Jul 5, 11:33 am, iSAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[sage-support] Re: C/ Fortran/ .... code generation ?

On Jul 5, 3:02 am, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 5, 9:16 am, Thierry Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >   Hello, > > > My question is: is there / will there  be some tool for code generation > > in Sage ? It has been discussed of doing something like that recently at S

[sage-support] Re: RuntimeError: no available port

On Jul 9, 7:58 am, kex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also tried: > ./sage > notebook(port=8101) > tried also some other numbers 9000 7999 8500...80 50.. still the > same error Hi, you should check your firewall settings. It looks like you are blocking all traffic, so moving the port is un

[sage-support] Re: problem installing polymake.

On Jul 10, 4:51 am, Thierry Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Hi Thierry, > I'm trying to install polymake in Sage (3.0.3), on 2 systems: > -Ubuntu server 8.03 (source locally compiled version) > -Debian Etch (binary package), > > and I do not succeed to install polymake: > > this a pro

[sage-support] Re: SAGE-3.0.4 Did NOT Build!

On Jul 10, 10:46 am, joseph1110 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Dr. Stein, et al.: Hi, >   SAGE-3.0.4 did NOT build from source! >   I have attached the file named "install.log" to Dr. Stein. There is no log attached. You should *not* attach some huge installlog since this email goes to 600

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >