As part of a research project we're using sage as a subroutine for some
matrix computations over rings. We have hundreds or thousands of these
computations, but each computation is fairly quick. Right now, for each
computation we write python code into a .sage file, and then start a new
proce
.is_prime()\n");
>Py_Finalize();
>return 0;
> }
> }}}
>
> 2. Then to compile you need to do
>
> $ sage -sh
> $ gcc $(python2-config --cflags) $(python2-config --ldflags) test.c
>
> 3. Run the program (still in the sage-sh shell)
>
> $ .
I'll look into using a pipe, that's a good suggestion and might be easier
than the embedded interpreter.
On Jan 10, 2018 23:54, "Jori Mäntysalo" wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, Berkeley Churchill wrote:
(@Jori: unfortunately starting one process and doing all the computat
