I'll look into using a pipe, that's a good suggestion and might be easier than the embedded interpreter.
On Jan 10, 2018 23:54, "Jori Mäntysalo" <jori.mantys...@uta.fi> wrote: On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, Berkeley Churchill wrote: (@Jori: unfortunately starting one process and doing all the computations > at once won't work for us because we need to dynamically generate the n+1st > computation based on the output of the nth computation. We could > theoretically port all that logic to python/sage, but we don't really think > that's worth it right now) > Maybe you should then use pipe? First mkfifo thepipe ./sage -q < thepipe > thepipe and on the another window I tested with jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ echo 1+2 > thepipe jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ read result < thepipe jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ echo $result sage: 3 jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ tmp=$(echo $result | cut -f 2 -d ' ') jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ echo $tmp+3 > thepipe jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ read anotherresult < thepipe jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ echo $anotherresult sage: 6 jm58660@j-op7010:~/sage$ echo quit > thepipe Or maybe use Sage as controller part, i.e. call C++-program from Sage instead of calling Sage from C++-program? -- Jori Mäntysalo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
