In the code below g1 and g2 are the same group, where g2 is produced as a
subgroup of g1, and c is the principal character of g1. Still, when it
comes to scalar products, somehow g1 is not considered as a subgroup of
itself:
sage: g1 = SymmetricGroup(2)
: g2 = g1.conjugacy_classes_subgroups
The following code yields a Traceback for no (to me) obvious reason. The
same happens on sagecell too. It seems to be a minimal case. For instance
removing the line "P = ..." or having less deeply nested loops does not
display this problem:
for A in PrimitiveGroups(3):
for G in A.normal_sub
it is not libgap, it is pexpect GAP that is used here - something we should
get rid of.
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, 23:39 'Peter Mueller' via sage-support, <
sage-support@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> The following code yields a Traceback for no (to me) obvious reason. The
> same happens on sagecell too.
