On Sep 21, 10:34 pm, Nasser Abbasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me rewrite what I wrote in last post again, since it did not
> format well.
>
I think it is still not clear, so I wrote it in latex via SW, here it
is again as screen image and PDF file
http://12000.org/tmp/092108/eq.gif
http
Hi all,
this is a reminder that Sage Days 10 (SD10) is fast approaching! It is still
possible to register until October 3. See http://wiki.sagemath.org/days10,
where you can see the scientific program, with the titles and abstracts of the
invited and contributed talks.
After SD6 in Bristo
(2) Thanks that sounds good. I'm not sure how to use #auto though,
where do I put this option?
Cheers,
Maike
On Sep 5, 6:12 pm, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a wiki page for notebook suggestions, but I don't think its
> been used much lately:http://wiki.sagemath.
Hi Maike,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (2) Thanks that sounds good. I'm not sure how to use #auto though,
> where do I put this option?
You put %auto as the first line of the cell that you want to auto-evaluate.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~--
It doesn't converge because in your first post you said
assume(f>0)
Its convergence is the same as
integral( cos(2 * pi * f * t), t , 0 , Infinity)
(think about area under a curve...). By the way, sage gives:
sage: t = var("t")
sage: x = var("x")
sage: assume(x>0)
sage: integral( cos(2 * pi
On Sep 22, 12:14 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sage: integral( cos(2 * pi * x * t), t , 0 , Infinity)
> ind
>
> What is "ind"?
my guess: indefinite (NaN in python-speak)
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support
you can indirectly get
> ./sage
---
| SAGE Version 3.1.1 ...
| Type notebook() ...
--
sage: var('a b t x')
(a, b, t, x)
sage: assume(b<0)
sage: expr(x)=integral(exp(-2*I*pi*(a+I*b)*t),t,0,x)
sage: factor(limit(expr(x),x=infinity))
(where is my my last post ?)
you can indirectly get :
>./sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.1 ...
| Type notebook()
--
sage: var('a b t x')
(a, b, t, x)
sage: assume(b<0)
sage: expr(x)=integral(exp(-2*I*pi*(a+I*b)*t),t,0,x)
sage: factor(limit(expr
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:03 AM, kkwweett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (where is my my last post ?)
All 1st posts must be moderated due to the large amount of spam sent to
the list.
>
> you can indirectly get :
>
>>./sage
> --
> | SAGE Version 3.1.1 ...
> | Type noteb
Hmmm, I get "NameError: name 'auto' is not defined". I'm using version
3.1.1, should that support %auto?
Thanks! Maike
On Sep 22, 12:06 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Maike,
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (2) Thanks that sounds good
L.S.,
When updating to Sage 3.1.2 I run into the following problem:
Am using a Mac G4 dual core, OSX 10.4.11.
Used a previous version of Sage without apparent problems. Updating to
3.1.2 however was not without hickups: copying Sage with the finder
resulted in error messages that duplicate names
Hi,
I would guess this might be related to ticket #1870. If I try to run
sage -wiki or wiki() I get an error.
$ sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.2, Release Date: 2008-09-16 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and li
David Joyner wrote:
> sage: assume(x>0)
> sage: integral( cos(2 * pi * x * t), t , 0 , Infinity)
> ind
>
> What is "ind"?
I guess this is coming from Maxima, where ind = indeterminate.
Btw und = undefined if ever you run across that, and don't forget
inf = positive real infinity, minf = negati
On Sep 22, 5:38 am, arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> L.S.
Hi,
> When updating to Sage 3.1.2 I run into the following problem:
>
> Am using a Mac G4 dual core, OSX 10.4.11.
> Used a previous version of Sage without apparent problems. Updating to
> 3.1.2 however was not without hickups: copyi
On 9/22/08, Maike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I get "NameError: name 'auto' is not defined". I'm using version
> 3.1.1, should that support %auto?
Use #auto, not %auto
>
> Thanks! Maike
>
> On Sep 22, 12:06 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Maike,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22,
On Sep 22, 6:59 am, Adam Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Adam,
> I would guess this might be related to ticket #1870. If I try to run
> sage -wiki or wiki() I get an error.
>
> $ sage
> --
> | SAGE Version 3.1.2, Rele
>
> It works for me:
>
> sage: wiki()
> **
> * *
> * Open your web browser tohttp://localhost:9000*
> * *
> ***
I want to produce a worksheet tutorial for SAGE usage on our campus
and was wondering how I could add static text around the notebook
cells like is done in the live tutorial . Do I just edit as plain text
and add formatting there?
D. Monarres
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--~--~-~--~~--
Is server 2 currently down? I have troubles in running sage there this
morning.
my username there is pong
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For mo
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:05 AM, D. Monarres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to produce a worksheet tutorial for SAGE usage on our campus
> and was wondering how I could add static text around the notebook
> cells like is done in the live tutorial . Do I just edit as plain text
> and add fo
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:36 AM, pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is server 2 currently down? I have troubles in running sage there this
> morning.
Thanks for letting me know. The server directory is suddenly out of disk
space, so the server can't work. So I've deleted a bunch of files, s
William,
Thanks for the reply. And I understand that could happen. Well, it
looks like the content of one of my worksheets is gone. In my case,
that's really no big deal. But I hope other people who have more
substantial worksheets in that server won't encounter the same
problem.
On Sep 22,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:01 PM, pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William,
>
>Thanks for the reply. And I understand that could happen. Well, it
> looks like the content of one of my worksheets is gone. In my case,
> that's really no big deal. But I hope other people who have more
> substa
I had the content earlier this morning. But couldn't run sage on it. I
might accidentally click the "discard and quit" button. But if I'm not
mistaken, usually the old content will still be there.
I think (and hope) this is an isolated case.
On Sep 22, 12:02 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sep 15, 10:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday 15 September 2008, phil wrote:
>
> > I've been pushing the limits of determinant calculation over
> > multivariate polynomial rings. I can calculate determinants of
> > matrices up to 9x9 of the form [[x_0_0, x_0_1],[
On Sep 22, 4:23 pm, phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 10:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'll try to reproduce the crash and see what I can do about it. You could
> > help
> > by running sage -gdb (if you have gdb installed) and send me the backtrace
> > of
Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the solutions (s)
in a list; e.g.:
sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
q = slst[j]
j=q[0]; k=(q[1]); s=(q[2])
(q,j,k,s)
:
([52, 30, 2081203288L], 52, 30, 2081203288L)
([53, 53, 17903198518682712L], 53, 53, 17903198518682712L)
No
I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor around in
the text is one character at a time using the left and right arrow keys
and the back
Bob Wonderly wrote:
> Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the solutions (s)
> in a list; e.g.:
>
> sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
> q = slst[j]
> j=q[0]; k=(q[1]); s=(q[2])
> (q,j,k,s)
> .:
> ([52, 30, 2081203288L], 52, 30, 2081203288L)
> ([53, 53, 17903198518
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Bob Wonderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor around in
> the t
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bob Wonderly wrote:
>> Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the solutions (s)
>> in a list; e.g.:
>>
>> sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
>> q = slst[j]
>> j=q[0]; k=(q[1]); s=(q[2])
>> (q,j,k,s
Bob Wonderly wrote:
> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor around in
> the text is one character at a time using the left and ri
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>> Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the
>>> solutions (s)
>>> in a list; e.g.:
>>>
>>> sage: for j in range(52,54,1):
>>
On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>
> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor
> around in
> the text is one characte
William Stein wrote:
> Regarding your "long" question in the other thread, you might
> try typing
>
> SR(s)
>
> to explicitly coerce s from a long to a "symbolic ring element".
>
That doesn't work, which might be a bug:
sage: SR(long(2))
-
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bob Wonderly wrote:
Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put
On Sep 22, 6:17 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> >> This is a bug, so I've added it to trac:
>
> >>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4171
>
> > ... just after I added the ticket here:http://trac.sagemath.org/
> > sage_
David Philp wrote:
>
> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>
>> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
>> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very tedious
>> in that the only way I have figured out how to move the cursor
>> around in
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Bob Wonderly wrote:
Using Sage I solved a long list of equations and put the
solutions (s)
in a list; e.g.:
sag
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:17 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bob Wonderly w
On 23/09/2008, at 11:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> David Philp wrote:
>>
>> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>
>>> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
>>> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very
>>> tedious
>>> in that the on
David Philp wrote:
>
> On 23/09/2008, at 11:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> David Philp wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>>
I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very
William Stein wrote:
>
> What's the rule about whose is a dupe then? I posted on sage-support
> first, but you hit "new ticket" first.I'll let you have the ticket; please
> mark mine a dupe.
Hehe...I believe it's the "Code talks" rule. Robert has a patch up
already :).
Jason
--~--~--
On Sep 22, 2008, at 18:19 , Jason Grout wrote:
>
> David Philp wrote:
>>
>> On 23/09/2008, at 11:00 AM, Bob Wonderly wrote:
>>
>>> I run Sage on my Mac rather than on the web. I often bring up the
>>> previous command and edit it then rerun it. The editor is very
>>> tedious
>>> in that the on
Oops. Forgot one thing...
On Sep 22, 2008, at 20:18 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 18:19 , Jason Grout wrote:
[snip]
>> What is the "meta" key in OS X? For me, pressing escape (my meta
>> key)
>> and then b takes me back a word. Does option-b take you back?
>
> "Get Info" on
On Sep 21, 2008, at 23:35 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Sep 21, 11:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the same crap issue you hit when building 3.1.2.rc-something,
> i.e. emacs is linked against Apple's libnpng while launching it from
> hg causes it to pick up "out" linpng.
On Sep 22, 8:41 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2008, at 23:35 , mabshoff wrote:
Hi Justin,
> > On Sep 21, 11:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is the same crap issue you hit when building 3.1.2.rc-something,
> > i.e. emacs is linked a
On Sep 22, 2008, at 21:33 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Sep 22, 8:41 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sep 21, 2008, at 23:35 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> I'll guess that it's a difference between versions (1.2.22 vs.
>> 1.2.24), but I can't find old source on the libpng site, an
On Sep 22, 10:16 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 21:33 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
Hi Justin,
> > I am playing with libpng-1.2.32 since that is the latest release and
> > also has a boatload of security updates since the lowly 1.2.22 that we
> > ship. Hopef
Hi,
Thanks a lot, that solves it.
arnold
On Sep 22, 6:27 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 5:38 am, arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > L.S.
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> > When updating to Sage 3.1.2 I run into the following problem:
>
> > Am using a Mac G4 dual core, OS
> > ^^^ This is some sort of permission error. Are you running SELinux or
> > something like that?
>
Just to confirm. SELinux was added to the computer. I am now
'negotiating' with IT. :-)
cheers,
Adam
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sa
If I do:
sage: MS = MatrixSpace(IntegerModRing(9), 5,5)
sage: G = MS([[5, 0, 0, 0, 4],[4, 5, 0, 0, 0],[0, 4, 5, 0, 0],[0, 0,4,
5, 0], [0, 0, 0, 4, 5]])
sage: G.base_ring()
Ring of integers modulo 9
is there a way to get the base ring as an integer?, i.e. I want to
know the base ring to work with
I start sage and I type notebook and firefox is open to the following
address:
http://localhost:8000/?startup_token=1af26f2b14cac678ab97c121c9cca7c5
which is not found, so I have to cut it just to http://localhost:8000,
is there a way to solve this problem?
--~--~-~--~~~-
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:34 PM, cesarnda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I do:
>
> sage: MS = MatrixSpace(IntegerModRing(9), 5,5)
> sage: G = MS([[5, 0, 0, 0, 4],[4, 5, 0, 0, 0],[0, 4, 5, 0, 0],[0, 0,4,
> 5, 0], [0, 0, 0, 4, 5]])
> sage: G.base_ring()
> Ring of integers modulo 9
>
> is
On Sep 22, 2008, at 22:24 , mabshoff wrote:
> Nope, none of those fixes is in alpha0, but I hope that at least some
> of them will make it into alpha1, due out late tomorrow. I still don't
> see how parallel make impacts numpy, so if you could send me the
> portion of the blown up numpy build wi
On Sep 22, 11:32 pm, Adam Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ^^^ This is some sort of permission error. Are you running SELinux or
> > > something like that?
Hi Adam,
> Just to confirm. SELinux was added to the computer. I am now
> 'negotiating' with IT. :-)
good luck negotiating :). You c
On Sep 22, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:34 PM, cesarnda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If I do:
>>
>> sage: MS = MatrixSpace(IntegerModRing(9), 5,5)
>> sage: G = MS([[5, 0, 0, 0, 4],[4, 5, 0, 0, 0],[0, 4, 5, 0, 0],[0,
>> 0,4,
>> 5, 0], [0, 0, 0
On Sep 22, 11:39 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2008, at 22:24 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Nope, none of those fixes is in alpha0, but I hope that at least some
> > of them will make it into alpha1, due out late tomorrow. I still don't
> > see how parallel make impact
58 matches
Mail list logo
