> I encourage you to read the source code of this @parallel stuff --
> it's only about 2 pages of actual code,
> which I wrote at some Sage days as my project back in maybe 2008.
Will do, thanks again!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" g
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Christian Stump
wrote:
> Thanks, William!
>
>> It absolutely will use two additional *processes*, as you might see by
>> watching with htop, top, or using ps.
>
> Is it right that the master process is creating all the subprocesses?
> I'd suspect I don't quite see t
Thanks, William!
> It absolutely will use two additional *processes*, as you might see by
> watching with htop, top, or using ps.
Is it right that the master process is creating all the subprocesses?
I'd suspect I don't quite see the other processes in action simply
because they are there only fo
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Christian Stump
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I wonder how to parallelize the following scenario.
>
> I have a method that initiates a (not very simple) data strucure and then
> runs a for-loop (of, say, length 1,000-20,000) to populate that data
> structure with data. The
Hi there,
I wonder how to parallelize the following scenario.
I have a method that initiates a (not very simple) data strucure and then
runs a for-loop (of, say, length 1,000-20,000) to populate that data
structure with data. The computations in each loop is not trivial, but
fairly optimized u
