On 2013-01-20 16:38, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> This looks like
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13672
This was due to a bad call to PARI (a ring object was passed as variable
name where PARI expects a string).
Needs review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13672
--
You receive
This looks like
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13672
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support+unsub
On 2013-01-20 16:25, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2013-01-20 15:56, Kannappan Sampath wrote:
>> In Sage 5.5 and the 5.6.5c1, I get 4 as the output.
> ...which is still wrong, the correct result would be 0. So we replaced
> a wrong answer by a different wrong answer, progress!
I meant to say, the di
On 2013-01-20 15:56, Kannappan Sampath wrote:
> In Sage 5.5 and the 5.6.5c1, I get 4 as the output.
...which is still wrong, the correct result would be 0. So we replaced
a wrong answer by a different wrong answer, progress!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
Sorry, I meant to say Sage version 5.4.1.
In Sage 5.5 and the 5.6.5c1, I get 4 as the output. May be upgrade Sage? :)
>
I just updated to 5.5, with the same result as you. So the OLD bug was
replaced by a NEW bug, because the discriminant of f-t must have the root
0, so it cannot be a nonzero c
Hello,
sage: version()
'Sage Version 5.5, Release Date: 2012-12-22'
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Peter Mueller wrote:
> I believe the following Sage code (version 4.5.1) exhibits a bug:
>
> sage: K.=GF(5)[]
> sage: R.=K[]
> sage: S.=GF(5)[]
> sage: f=x^10+2*x^6+2*x^5+x+2
> sage:
> sage: S(f)
I believe the following Sage code (version 4.5.1) exhibits a bug:
sage: K.=GF(5)[]
sage: R.=K[]
sage: S.=GF(5)[]
sage: f=x^10+2*x^6+2*x^5+x+2
sage:
sage: S(f).factor()
(y + 3)^6 * (y^4 + 2*y^3 + 4*y^2 + 3*y + 3)
The code and its up to here correct results show that f is inseparable, so
0 should
