# HG changeset patch
# User Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date 1179852649 25200
# Node ID 5d423d8161906a30efe1b6837524724737303db2
# Parent 82e2148257968030ef5a6d2a5ee415aaf0927f28
implemented SR.numerical_approximation()
diff -r 82e214825796 -r 5d423d816190 sage/calculus/calculus.py
--- a/
On 5/21/07, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past, we've favored polluting the class namespace over lack of
> clarity. For example, simplify_trig = trig_simplify, simplify_rational =
> rational_simplify, etc. Would it be so bad to have, something like:
>
> def numerical_approximat
On 5/21/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/21/07, Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On May 21, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Brian Harris wrote:
> > > Fair enough. A previous discussion led me to believe the goal was for
> > > more transparent rings. Have you considered supporting
On May 21, 7:24 pm, Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 21, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Brian Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> > Fair enough. A previous discussion led me to believe the goal was for
> > more transparent rings. Have you considered supporting something like
> > the following?
>
> > cos(3).tor
On 5/21/07, Yi Qiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 21, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Brian Harris wrote:
> > Fair enough. A previous discussion led me to believe the goal was for
> > more transparent rings. Have you considered supporting something like
> > the following?
> >
> > cos(3).toreal()
> I wo
On May 21, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Brian Harris wrote:
>
> Fair enough. A previous discussion led me to believe the goal was for
> more transparent rings. Have you considered supporting something like
> the following?
>
> cos(3).toreal()
I would second this suggestion. I was also confused as how to
Fair enough. A previous discussion led me to believe the goal was for
more transparent rings. Have you considered supporting something like
the following?
cos(3).toreal()
On May 21, 9:12 pm, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Harris wrote:
> > How can I get sage to print the numer
Brian Harris wrote:
> How can I get sage to print the numeric value of an expression such
> as, cos(3)?
sage: cos(3)
cos(3)
sage: RR(cos(3))
-0.989992496600445
>
> Also is there a way to switch between 'radian' and 'degree' modes like
> in some calculators?
Everything is in radians. To com
